Scientific conference

A scientific conference is a meeting of scientists of a certain research field, intended to bring them together to learn about recent developments, present new data to each other and discuss it critically, and to socialize and get to know new colleagues. These meetings do go by multiple names depending on their size and scope.[1] Regular participation in conferences is considered vital for a career scientist, and being an invited speaker at meetings is an important recognition of the influence of one's work. A fairly famous example is the Solvay Conference, where the nature of physics has been hammered out over the course of the 20th Century.

The poetry of reality
Science
We must know.
We will know.
A view from the
shoulders of giants.
v - t - e

An important advantage of presenting data at a conference in comparison to publishing them in a journal paper is that feedback and critical evaluation can be given immediately. Most conferences result in the publication of a book of conference proceedings listing the abstracts (summaries) of the research projects that were presented, some even in the publication of a special volume of a scientific journal in which full original papers with relevance to the conference topic are collected.

Nevertheless, all important results are later published in paper form and formally refereed and reviewed in journal articles as conference proceedings can be preliminary. The media can often mis-report scientific conclusions based on conference proceedings due to the lack of review in what scientists say. This was the case with the MMR vaccine controversy where Andrew Wakefield's (later retracted) Lancet paper gained no traction with the press, but his more open statement on the vaccine causing autism at a conference two years later sent the story global.

Organization of scientific conferences

Many conferences are yearly meetings of scientific societies, even though non-members from the same research area will also participate. The technical organization usually lies in the hands of the host institute which will change from year to year. In some cases, interested researchers may also be invited to a one-off conference on a very specific, current topic. These meetings or symposia are usually much smaller in scope. Funding for conferences is raised from research funding agencies, from the host institute's university, through sponsoring especially from companies hoping to advertise for lab equipment or textbooks, and through membership and conference participation fees.

Standard structure of a conference

Talks and presentations

Researchers present their results in two different ways. The first is a talk of variously 10-25 minutes followed by 2-5 minutes of open questions from the audience and discussion. Invited keynote speakers may give talks of up to 45 minutes followed by 15 minutes of discussion, usually one per subtopic. Today, PowerPoint presentations are the standard for talks.

Prospective participants submit their suggestions for contributions several weeks or even months in advance. The best talks are then selected by the organizing committee.

Posters

The best general advice I can give a first-time poster constructor is to describe the circumstances in which a poster will eventually be viewed: a hot, congested room filled with people who are there primarily to socialize, not to look at posters. Because poster sessions are often concurrent with the "wine and beer" mixer, chaos is further increased by hundreds of uninhibited graduate students staggering around hitting on each other. It's not a pretty sight.
—Colin Purrington on poster sessions[2]

The second possibility to contribute to a scientific meeting is by presenting a poster, often measuring ca. 119 x 84 cm (A0). The format and style is pretty well established, but some do have a bit more effort put in.

If a submission is rejected, would-be presenters often have the option of presenting their results as a poster instead. The number of posters is usually much less limited, but it is possible that only one contribution per first author is allowed. Conferences provide time slots for poster sessions, in which participants stand around near their posters and may be approached for questions.

Schedule

Conferences last between two days and a week. They often start with an informal reception evening. The next day, some addresses of welcome are given, and the rest of the time consists entirely of talks interrupted only by coffee or lunch breaks and poster sessions. Very large meetings may have multiple parallel symposia, so that participants have to decide which talks they find more relevant or interesting. In some areas of research, especially organismal biology or geography, they can be coupled with an optional conference trip or excursion at the end, dealing with an aspect of the host institute's surroundings. Nearly all meetings include an optional conference dinner sometime in the middle which is specifically meant for socializing.

Piss up

Almost without doubt, the the conference will end with a good old fashioned piss up in the hotel bar and function room. Wealthy attendees from industry (as opposed to their skint academic counterparts) may even charge all this on account. Meanwhile postgraduate students attending a conference for the first time, stuck in a foreign country and paying for drinks in a currency they're not too familiar with, can be found passed out in the lobby around 3 am. Any conference or lecture can be guaranteed to have its attendance doubled or tripled with addition of the words "free wine reception". Scientists are human, after all.

Taking socialization to the next stage

An approximate equivalent of "beer goggles" is a fairly common phenomenon at conferences, as midnight approaches and the boring people are still discussing X-ray crystallography. Women may find themselves invited to continue the erudite discussion in somebody else's room, which they are of course free to accept or decline. See Elevatorgate.

gollark: That is... an odd way to abbreviate my name.
gollark: It doesn't seem like it would actually work that way. It seems like it'll just be "investing in memes the moderators like".
gollark: Yes, that would be good.
gollark: It seems like the alternative to "people invest in memes from their firms" would just be to have people blindly invest in anything you flag as "going to be popular" here, which... doesn't seem better? And would actually be quite like the old days of MemeBot.
gollark: ↑

References

  1. PhD Comics - What To Call Your Academic Event (no, really, this is absolutely how it works)
  2. Purrington, C.B. 2009. Advice on designing scientific posters. Link
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.