Carrot

The carrot is an orange (normally, although many eastern varieties are purple) root vegetable related to such others as parsley, fennel, dill and cumin. Originating in Afghanistan, it is an excellent source of Vitamin A which is metabolised from the orange pigment β-carotene which gives it its characteristic colour.

This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Carrot could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

Potentially edible!
Food woo
Fabulous food!
Delectable diets!
Bodacious bods!
v - t - e

Woo

Carrots were the subject of a very pointed (har!) and partially successful woo during WWII.

UK fighter pilot John Cunningham (Cat's Eyes) was the first person to shoot down an enemy plane with the help of radar. The existence, or at least the success, of radar was concealed by crediting a high carrot (vitamin A) diet. As there was already a German folklore myth that carrots improved night vision, the subterfuge worked. Along the same lines, British pilots were given bilberry (a herb) which purportedly improved night vision.

Although deficiency of Vitamin A causes night blindness, a surfeit does not improve it and can be toxic, as anyone who's eaten a polar bear's liver will know.[citation NOT needed]

With the stick

The carrot and stick is a popular motivational technique to subjugate horses, donkeys, and mules. The offer of a carrot to a horse (or donkey etc.) as reward is attached to a stick that makes the carrot just out of reach. Some instances has an additional stick to strike the animal to help it along. The promise of Heaven and threat of Hell in the Abrahamic religions is perhaps the ultimate example of the carrot-and-stick method.

gollark: They *could* if they control the last pick, yes, hmmm.
gollark: Generate the outcome deterministically from the hashes of the inputs or something.
gollark: Perhaps this technology could somehow be adapted to the raffle.
gollark: That would make it explicitly net negative.
gollark: There are three outcomes, roughly:- it is fair, you win: you gain the total money- it is fair, you do not win: you lose what you spent- it is biased/evil/infohazardous and you lose money: you lose what you spent

See also

This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.