SRD Talk:Mage's Disjunction

Wording

There should perhaps be a section on the implications of the fact that this is a burst spell- IE, you can hide from it behind a nonmagical tower shield. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.209.101.58 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 25 November 2006 (MST). Please sign your posts.

This discussion page is exactly where this fact belongs. Thanks for the detail. I never knew that. --Dmilewski 20:33, 25 November 2006 (MST)

Name

This spell is actually called "Mordenkainen’s Disjunction" I have no idea where you guys got Mage's Disjunction from. --202.43.235.103 18:13, 19 September 2009 (MDT)

Wotc owns Mordenkainen’s name. so under ogl, blah blah blah... --Name Violation 01:36, 20 September 2009 (MDT)

Well that just seems silly. Just put M0rdenkainen instead if you have to. That's not Mordenkainen. Jude Paxmrosy 18:43, 17 May 2011 (MDT)

You can't. Wizards allows you free access to most of their rules so long as you abide by their terms. I'd say it's a fair tradeoff. Jazz Man 19:25, 17 May 2011 (MDT)

gollark: Although perhaps less if you compress it, hmmmm.

gollark: I bet you could transcode HTML to protobuffers/msgpack/etc and save a lot of space.

gollark: Or a binary HTML encoding or something (actually, that might be good)?

gollark: Zim also uses off-the-shelf compression (xz, zstd) - should they have developed a custom format for *that* too which might be better for their usecase somehow?

gollark: SQLite is harder to deal with if you're just asking "how do I deal with these raw bytes with no libraries æææææææææ", but this is not actually the case.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.