SRD:Shuriken
This material is published under the OGL |
| |||||||||||
Size | Cost1 | Damage | Weight1 | hp1 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fine | * | — | * | * | |||||||
Diminutive | * | — | * | * | |||||||
Tiny | * | — | * | * | |||||||
Small | 1 gp | 1 | 1/4 lb. | * | |||||||
Medium | 1 gp | 1d2 | 1/2 lb. | * | |||||||
Large | 2 gp | 1d3 | 1 lb. | * | |||||||
Huge | * | 1d4 | * | * | |||||||
Gargantuan | * | 1d6 | * | * | |||||||
Colossal | * | 1d8 | * | * | |||||||
|
Description
A shuriken is a special monk weapon. This designation gives a monk wielding shuriken special options. A shuriken can’t be used as a melee weapon.
Although they are thrown weapons, shuriken are treated as ammunition for the purposes of drawing them, crafting masterwork or otherwise special versions of them and what happens to them after they are thrown.
Prices and weights are for five shuriken.
Enhancements
Material | Average | Masterwork1 | Hardness | hp2 | Special |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steel | 1 gp | 31 gp | 10 | * | — |
Adamantine | — | 301 gp | 20 | * | Bypass hardness less than 20 |
Deep Crystal | — | 101 gp | 10 | * | Psionic |
Mundane Crystal | — | 31 gp | 8 | * | No rusting, not metal |
Darkwood | — | n/a | n/a | n/a | — |
Iron, Cold | 2 gp | 32 gp | 10 | * | Magical enchantments cost an additional 200 gp. |
Mithral | — | 251 gp | 15 | * | 1/2 weight |
Silver, Alchemical | 11 gp | 41 gp | 8 | * | −1 damage |
|
Bonus Value | Additional Cost1 | Hardness Increase2 | Additional hp2 |
---|---|---|---|
+1 | +200 gp | +2 | +10 |
+2 | +800 gp | +4 | +20 |
+3 | +1,800 gp | +6 | +30 |
+4 | +3,200 gp | +8 | +40 |
+5 | +5,000 gp | +10 | +50 |
+6 | +7,200 gp3 | +12 | +60 |
+7 | +9,800 gp3 | +14 | +70 |
+8 | +12,800 gp3 | +16 | +80 |
+9 | +16,200 gp3 | +18 | +90 |
+10 | +20,000 gp3 | +20 | +100 |
+11 or more | + bonus squared × 2,000 gp | + enhancement bonus × 2 | + enhancement bonus × 10 |
|
See Also
Back to Main Page → 3.5e Open Game Content → System Reference Document→ Weapons
gollark: Also, I don't think stuff is *generally* regulated based on summing up long term expected happiness change or something? Perhaps it should be, but it's very hard to calculate and runs into problems, and (in my opinion as a libertarian-leaning person) leads to stuff which is "out of scope" of government actions.
gollark: You're stereotyping in some vaguely rude way with ~0 empirical data to back it up.
gollark: I suspect you're ridiculously overgeneralizing and/or, er, what's the word, patronising? a bunch of people.
gollark: "Benefit to society" is vague and seems to mostly just work as a bludgeon to complain about things which don't have some obvious and Morally Pure™ justification to exist.
gollark: I'm speaking (typing) in general, I mean.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.