Diamond Knight (5e Creature)

Diamond Knight

Medium construct, unaligned

Armor Class 16 (Card Plate Armor)
Hit Points 35 (5d10+7)
Speed 25

STR	DEX	CON	INT	WIS	CHA
16 (+3)	9 (-1)	18 (+4)	3 (-4)	6 (-2)	8 (-1)

Damage Vulnerabilities Fire
Damage Resistances Piercing
Condition Immunities Frightened, Charmed
Senses passive Perception 12
Languages —
Challenge 1 (200 XP)

Antimagic Susceptibility. Diamond knights are incapacitated while in the area of an antimagic field. If targeted by dispel magic, it must succeed on a Constitution saving throw against the caster's spell save DC or fall unconscious for 1 minute.

ACTIONS

Diamond Spear. Melee Weapon Attack: +3 to hit, reach 5 ft., one target. Hit: 7/9 (1d8/1d10 + 3) Slashing damage.

Spear Gore. (Recharge 1d6+2 Turns) Melee Weapon Attack: +3 to hit, reach 20 ft. Line, one target. Hit: 7/9 (1d10 + 3) Piercing damage.

Diamond knights are one of the four suit related creatures, the others being heart clerics, club bashers, and spade rogues. They exist as minions to the people that summon them and take on traits that their masters have. If a diamond knight's summoner is killed or the summoner relinquishes their control over them, they wander the lands in search of new meaning. Sadly, since they are made out of a very flammable, dissolvable, and all-around destroyable substance, it is borderline impossible to find a diamond knight being hospitalized or finding one in the wilds. When they wish to, they can summon a weapon made out of playing cards made of the suit of that creature. In particular, diamond knights can summon a diamond spear, a long, tri-tip spear that can gore enemies.

Back to Main Page → 5e Homebrew → 5e Creatures

gollark: I do think it would be good for cities to be split out into somewhat smaller cities with better land prices/traffic/etc, though.

gollark: Entirely anecdotally, I live in [RURAL AREA REDACTED] and don't like it because there is *nothing to do here*. Generally speaking, cities being less city-y would probably reduce productivity a lot which would be bad.

gollark: Hmm, so we need better treatments for age-related mental issues, you mean.

gollark: I mean, if you end up in horrible health in the later bits, yes, but otherwise it seems pretty great.

gollark: ... *seriously*?

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.