1961–62 Serie C
The 1961–62 Serie C was the twenty-fourth edition of Serie C, the third highest league in the Italian football league system.
Girone A
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Triestina | 34 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 46 | 24 | +22 | 47 | Promoted to Serie B |
2 | Biellese | 34 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 47 | 28 | +19 | 46 | |
3 | Mestrina | 34 | 16 | 11 | 7 | 52 | 34 | +18 | 43 | |
4 | Fanfulla | 34 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 40 | 27 | +13 | 43 | |
5 | Varese | 34 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 43 | 29 | +14 | 39 | |
6 | Savona | 34 | 12 | 15 | 7 | 37 | 26 | +11 | 39 | |
7 | Marzotto | 34 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 30 | 33 | −3 | 35 | |
8 | Vittorio Veneto | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 33 | |
9 | Sanremese | 34 | 9 | 15 | 10 | 27 | 37 | −10 | 33 | |
10 | Cremonese | 34 | 13 | 5 | 16 | 43 | 42 | +1 | 31 | |
11 | Pordenone | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 36 | 37 | −1 | 31 | |
12 | Casale | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 34 | 38 | −4 | 31 | |
13 | Treviso | 34 | 9 | 13 | 12 | 21 | 31 | −10 | 31 | |
14 | Ivrea | 34 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 24 | 33 | −9 | 30 | |
15 | Legnano | 34 | 11 | 7 | 16 | 37 | 35 | +2 | 29 | |
16 | Saronno | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 24 | 37 | −13 | 28 | |
17 | Pro Vercelli | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 46 | −11 | 28[lower-alpha 1] | Relegated to Serie D |
18 | Bolzano | 34 | 2 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 56 | −39 | 15 |
Source:
Notes:
Notes:
- Relegated after tie-breaker: Pro Vercelli-Saronno 0-1
Girone B
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cagliari | 34 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 51 | 23 | +28 | 44 | Promoted to Serie B |
2 | Anconitana | 34 | 19 | 3 | 12 | 55 | 39 | +16 | 41 | |
3 | Pisa | 34 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 52 | 37 | +15 | 41 | |
4 | Arezzo | 34 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 52 | 45 | +7 | 39 | |
5 | Sarom Ravenna | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 53 | 39 | +14 | 38 | |
6 | Cesena | 34 | 12 | 13 | 9 | 32 | 29 | +3 | 37 | |
7 | Pistoiese | 34 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 42 | 37 | +5 | 34 | |
8 | Torres | 34 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 41 | 37 | +4 | 34 | |
9 | Rimini | 34 | 9 | 15 | 10 | 34 | 32 | +2 | 33 | |
10 | Siena | 34 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 35 | 37 | −2 | 33 | |
11 | Forlì | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 29 | 43 | −14 | 33 | |
12 | Perugia | 34 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 39 | 42 | −3 | 32 | |
13 | Livorno | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 34 | 39 | −5 | 31 | |
14 | Del Duca Ascoli | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 39 | 51 | −12 | 30 | |
15 | Portocivitanovese | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 30 | 42 | −12 | 30 | |
16 | Grosseto | 34 | 7 | 14 | 13 | 30 | 39 | −9 | 28 | |
17 | Spezia | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 31 | 49 | −18 | 27 | Relegated to Serie D |
18 | Empoli | 34 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 32 | 51 | −19 | 27 |
Source:
Girone C
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Foggia | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 42 | 22 | +20 | 45 | Promoted to Serie B |
2 | Lecce | 34 | 15 | 12 | 7 | 39 | 24 | +15 | 42 | |
3 | Salernitana | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 44 | 33 | +11 | 40 | |
4 | Potenza | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 40 | 30 | +10 | 40 | |
5 | Taranto | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 33 | 25 | +8 | 40 | |
6 | Trapani | 34 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 34 | 28 | +6 | 37 | |
7 | Marsala | 34 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 28 | 25 | +3 | 35 | |
8 | Reggina | 34 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 41 | 34 | +7 | 34 | |
9 | Akragas | 34 | 14 | 5 | 15 | 36 | 39 | −3 | 33 | |
10 | Pescara | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 29 | 30 | −1 | 32 | |
11 | Siracusa | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 39 | 43 | −4 | 32 | |
12 | Tevere Roma | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 37 | 42 | −5 | 31 | |
13 | Bisceglie | 34 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 36 | 41 | −5 | 31 | |
14 | Crotone | 34 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 24 | 32 | −8 | 30 | |
15 | L'Aquila | 34 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 18 | 29 | −11 | 30 | |
16 | Chieti | 34 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 34 | 45 | −11 | 29 | |
17 | San Vito Benevento | 34 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44 | −17 | 26 | Relegated to Serie D |
18 | Barletta | 34 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 28 | 43 | −15 | 25 |
Source:
References and sources
- Almanacco Illustrato del Calcio - La Storia 1898-2004, Panini Edizioni, Modena, September 2005
gollark: Oh, you know what would be cool and is... kind of related to this? Self-replicating turtles!
gollark: And shouldn't it just do generalized "go mining", or risk going up and down a lot and wasting fuel?
gollark: But... are there really multiple ways to do necessary things to do what a player asks for?
gollark: I mean, that's kind of the opposite.
gollark: So why should some things get "priorities" or something? Shouldn't it just try and do whatever it has to do to do what the player wants in the order which minimizes cost?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.