Waddington v. Sarausad

Waddington v. Sarausad, 555 U.S. 179 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case that involved the conviction of Cesar Sarausad for second-degree murder due to his role as driver in a shooting regarding gang activity and high school students. Sarausad sought federal habeas corpus relief, but the act of providing relief to Sarausad was called back into judicial review by the State of Washington in a certiorari petition. The Supreme Court agreed to review the case.

Waddington v. Sarausad
Argued October 15, 2008
Decided January 21, 2009
Full case nameDoug Waddington, Superintendent, Washington Corrections center, Petitioner v. Cesar Sarausad
Citations555 U.S. 179 (more)
129 S. Ct. 823; 172 L. Ed. 2d 532; 2009 U.S. LEXIS 867; 77 U.S.L.W. 4056; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 602
Holding
Sarausad was tried with due process by the State of Washington and he should not have been granted habeas corpus relief. In doing so, the federal government overstepped its bounds.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityThomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito
DissentSouter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg

The Roberts Court held that Sarausad was tried with due process by the State of Washington, and that he should not have been granted habeas corpus relief. In doing so, the federal government overstepped its bounds.

References

  • "Waddington v. Sarausad (07-772)". Legal Information Institute. Cornell University. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
  • "Syllabus of Waddington v. Sarausad". Legal Information Institute. Cornell University. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.