Tara Iyer
Tara Iyer (Telugu: తర ఆయర్, Hindi: तारा आयर, Tārā Āyara; born in Hyderabad) is a professional tennis player from India who has won four ITF singles tennis titles and one doubles title.[1]
| Country (sports) |  |
|---|---|
| Born | Hyderabad, India |
| Turned pro | 2003 |
| Plays | Right-handed, two-handed backhand |
| Singles | |
| Career record | 61–43 |
| Career titles | 4 ITF |
| Highest ranking | 350 (10 September 2007) |
| Doubles | |
| Career record | 25–21 |
| Career titles | 1 ITF |
| Highest ranking | 304 (18 February 2008) |
Personal life
Tara Iyer was born in the Indian metropolis of Hyderabad. Her mother is noted IRS officer, Indira Iyer and father is Parmeshwaran Iyer, an IAS officer.[2]
Career
2003-2010
Iyer played at the 2006 Sunfeast Open – Singles Qualifying where she won the First Round against Isha Lakhani 6–4, 6–2 before losing to Rushmi Chakravarthi 5–7, 4–6.
Iyer got a Wildcard to play at the 2007 Bangalore Open where she lost to Dominika Cibulková 0–6, 2–6 in Round 1.
Iyer also played for the Indian Fed Cup Team in the 2007 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone where she beat Sahar Al Disi of Jordan, 6–0, 6–0, but lost to Albina Khabibulina of Uzbekistan, 4–6, 6–7(3).
Iyer received a Wildcard to play at the 2007 Sunfeast Open where she lost the First Round Match against Flavia Pennetta, 3–6, 1–6.
2011
Iyer played at the 2011 Citi Open – Singles Qualifying where she was a Wildcard receiver. She played Līga Dekmeijere in the First Round and lost 6–7(4), 2–6.
Career statistics
Singles Finals: 4 (4-0)
| $100,000 tournaments |
| $75,000 tournaments |
| $50,000 tournaments |
| $25,000 tournaments |
| $10,000 tournaments |
| Outcome | No. | Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in the final | Score |
| Winner | 1. | 17 June 2007 | Montemor-o-Novo, Portugal | Hard |  |
6–4, 7–6(7–5) |
| Winner | 2. | 11 August 2007 | Wrexham, United Kingdom | Hard |  |
6–0, 6–1 |
| Winner | 3. | 25 August 2007 | Noida, India | Carpet | |
3–6, 6–4, 6–3 |
| Winner | 4. | 1 September 2007 | New Delhi, India | Hard |  |
7–5, 6–2 |
Doubles Finals: 3 (1–2)
| Outcome | No. | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partner | Opponents in the final | Score |
| Runner-up | 1. | 30 October 2006 | Ahmedabad, India | Hard | |
|
2–6, 4–6 |
| Runner-up | 2. | 10 August 2007 | Wrexham, United Kingdom | Hard |  |
|
4–6, 3–6 |
| Winner | 3. | 31 August 2007 | New Delhi, India | Hard |  |
|
6–4, 6–3 |
gollark: Left-justification:> Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in critique of social hierarchy.[1][2][3][4] Left-wing politics typically involves a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished.[1] According to emeritus professor of economics Barry Clark, left-wing supporters "claim that human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated."[5] No language (except esoteric apioforms) *truly* lacks generics. Typically, they have generics, but limited to a few "blessed" built-in data types; in C, arrays and pointers; in Go, maps, slices and channels. This of course creates vast inequality between the built-in types and the compiler writers and the average programmers with their user-defined data types, which cannot be generic. Typically, users of the language are forced to either manually monomorphise, or use type-unsafe approaches such as `void*`. Both merely perpetuate an unjust system which must be abolished.
gollark: Anyway, center-justify... centrism is about being precisely in the middle of the left and right options. I will imminently left-justify it, so centre-justification WILL follow.
gollark: Social hierarchies are literal hierarchies.
gollark: Hmm. Apparently,> Right-wing politics embraces the view that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable,[1][2][3] typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics, or tradition.[4]:693, 721[5][6][7][8][9] Hierarchy and inequality may be seen as natural results of traditional social differences[10][11] or competition in market economies.[12][13][14] The term right-wing can generally refer to "the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system".[15] Obviously, generics should exist in all programming languages ever, since they have existed for quite a while and been implemented rather frequently, and allow you to construct hierarchical data structures like trees which are able to contain any type.
gollark: Ah, I see. Please hold on while I work out how to connect those.
References
External links
Women's Tennis Association: | |
|---|---|
| |
|
Women's Tennis Association: | |
|---|---|
| |
|
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.