Sir Oswald Cheung's Chambers

Sir Oswald Cheung's Chambers, founded in 1965 and named after one of the co-founders, Sir Oswald Cheung, CBE, QC, SC, JP, is one of the oldest sets of barrister's chambers in Hong Kong. Cheung was largely credited with establishing the barrister's chambers system in Hong Kong, and as a result many of the leading legal minds in Cheung's era practiced out of his set of chambers.

Today, they are considered one of the leading barristers' chambers in Hong Kong, alongside others such as Temple Chambers. Sir Oswald Cheung's Chambers has a high ratio of Senior Counsel's to juniors, as well as a strong history of appointments into key judicial and government roles.[1]

History

Sir Oswald Cheung's Chambers was founded in 1965 by Cheung himself, along with Gerald de Basto QC, Charles Ching QC and Ronald Arculli.

Notable Members

Judiciary

Court of Final Appeal

High Court

  • The Honourable Madam Justice Doreen Le Pichon – Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (retired)
  • The Honourable Mr Justice Gerald Arthur de Basto – Judge of the Court of First Instance (retired)
  • The Honourable Mr Justice Wilson Chan Ka-shun – Judge of the Court of First Instance

District Court or Lower

  • Her Honour Judge Adriana Noelle Tse Ching – Judge of the District Court

Government (Legislative)

Hong Kong Bar Association Chairmen

  • Sir Oswald Victor Cheung, CBE, QC, SC, JP (1966)
  • Gerald Arthur de Basto, QC (1968–1970, 1973)
  • Charles Arthur Ching, GBM, QC (1975–1976)
  • Robert Tang Kwok-ching, GBM, SBS, QC, SC, JP (1988–1989)
  • Audrey Eu Yuet-mee, QC, SC, JP (1997–1998)
  • Edward Chan King-sang, SC, JP (2003–2004)

Independent Police Complaints Council Chairmen

  • Robert Tang Kwok-ching, GBM, SBS, QC, SC, JP (2000–2004)

Head of Chambers

  1. Sir Oswald Victor Cheung, CBE, QC, SC, JP (1965–2003)
  2. Robert Tang Kwok-ching, GBM, SBS, QC, SC, JP (2003–2004)
  3. Edward Chan King-sang, SC, JP (2004–present)

Ref

gollark: But the actual values are pretty subjective.
gollark: I mean, it *sort of* does? You can say something like "X system is good at satisfying Y values", and that is at least... objectively testable?
gollark: Which is pretty subjective, so kind of lacking the "right about everything" part.
gollark: But specifically about politics.
gollark: It is what?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.