Remote Video Inspection System

The Remote Video Inspection System (RVIS) was deployed by United States in the late 1990s at select low-traffic border entry points from Canada. The system allowed passport and customs inspections to be conducted remotely, so that low-risk travelers could enter the country during hours that the border station did not have on-site staff. The system was successfully deployed at a number of entry points, in six different states. RVIS was discontinued following the September 11 attacks.

RVIS in use at the Orient, Maine, port of entry in January 1997

Conception

In the early 1990s, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was interested in finding ways to enable low-risk travelers to enter the United States from Canada at small ports of entry after inspection services had ended for the day. INS commissioned its contractor EDS, as well as the Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center and its contractors Labblee Inc. and Bishop Systems to develop and deploy a system that transmitted audio, video and data to an inspector at a nearby 24-hour port of entry. The system was originally named "Remote Inspection Communicator And Remote Document Observer" (RICARDO), but the name was changed to Remote Video Inspection System (RVIS) prior to its first deployment.

Deployment

RVIS consisted of a series of pan–tilt–zoom cameras (PTZ), an amplified speakerphone, a card reader and a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD).[1] There were vehicle sensors at the Canada–United States border that initiated the system, and exit sensors that alerted operators that a drive-by had occurred. There were also area lights, a text display and a traffic signal. Some ports of entry had electronic gates for traffic management. Inspectors at the remote location could control the PTZ cameras, and conduct a verbal interview with the driver and passengers.

The first two RVIS sites were at the border crossings of Forest City and Orient in Maine in 1996.[2][3] By 2000, RVIS systems had been deployed at 18 of 22 planned locations:[4]

RVIS at the Pittsburg–Chartierville Border Crossing

U.S. state	U.S. location	Border crossing
Maine	Easton	Easton - River de Chute Border Crossing
	Forest City	Forest City Border Crossing
	Monticello	Monticello - Bloomfield Border Crossing
	Orient	Orient – Fosterville Border Crossing
Minnesota	Noyes	Noyes–Emerson East Border Crossing
	Pinecreek	Pinecreek–Piney Border Crossing
Montana	Scobey	Scobey–Coronach Border Crossing
	Whitetail	Whitetail–Big Beaver Border Crossing
	Whitlash	Whitlash-Aden Border Crossing
New Hampshire	Pittsburg	Pittsburg–Chartierville Border Crossing
North Dakota	Ambrose	Ambrose–Torquay Border Crossing
	Carbury	Carbury–Goodlands Border Crossing
	Hannah	Hannah–Snowflake Border Crossing
	Hansboro	Hansboro–Cartwright Border Crossing
	Maida	Maida–Windygates Border Crossing
	Northgate	Northgate Border Crossing
Washington	Ferry	Ferry-Midway Border Crossing
	Nighthawk	Nighthawk-Chopaka Border Crossing

Closed since 2006

Closed since 2013

RVIS was planned for the Morses Line Border Crossing in Vermont, but local residents opposed its installation.[5]

Decommission

The RVIS system never achieved its full potential because its deployment pre-dated the rollout of high speed data networking at all ports of entry, which caused the video transmission to be slow and cumbersome. Its usage was suspended following the September 11 attacks,[6] and the RVIS system was officially decommissioned on November 1, 2002.[7][8]

See also

• PORTPASS
• U.S. Customs and Border Protection

References

1. "Automated Port-of-Entry Opens in Pittsburgh, New Hampshire". INS Communiqué. Immigration and Naturalization Service. March 1999. p. 9. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via Google Books.
2. Brown, Wayne (March 17, 1996). "Border hopping simplified". Bangor Daily News. Bangor, Maine. p. 17. Retrieved July 13, 2020 – via newspapers.com.
3. Brown, Wayne (September 25, 1997). "Bill seeks to clarify murky immigration law". Bangor Daily News. Bangor, Maine. p. 12. Retrieved July 13, 2020 – via newspapers.com.
4. "Alternative Inspection Services Program" (PDF). Canada-United States Accord on Our Shared Border: Update 2000. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2000. pp. 29–31. ISBN 0-662-29359-2. Retrieved July 13, 2020 – via publicsafety.gc.ca.
5. Cowperthwait, Richard (September 17, 1997). "Residents criticize federal plans at Morses Line port". The Burlington Free Press. Burlington, Vermont. p. 13. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via newspapers.com.
6. Seghetti, Lisa M. (May 18, 2004). "Border Security: Immigration Issues in the 108th Congress" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. CRS-12. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via FAS.org.
7. "U.S. Customs Project to Enhance Security at Border Crossings" (Press release). U.S. Customs and Border Protection. November 1, 2002. Archived from the original on September 6, 2009 – via Wayback Machine.
8. Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for 2004: Titles I and II. United States Government Printing Office. 2003. p. 422. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via Google Books. That is one of the reasons that on October 31, 2002, Commissioner Bonner approved a recommendation by the Office of Field Operations to terminate the RVIS program and incorporate the existing RVIS equipment into the Northern Border Security Project.

Further reading

• "After hours, visitors go on video to cross border". Great Falls Tribune. Great Falls, Montana. February 6, 2000. p. 37. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via newspapers.com.