Perpich v. Department of Defense

Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334 (1990), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning the Militia Clauses of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution in which the court held that Congress may authorize members of the National Guard to be ordered to active federal duty for purposes of training outside the United States without either the consent of a state governor or the declaration of a national emergency. The plaintiff was Rudy Perpich, Governor of Minnesota at the time.

Perpich v. Department of Defense
Argued March 27, 1990
Decided June 11, 1990
Full case nameRudy Perpich, Governor of Minnesota, et al. v. Department of Defense, et al.
Citations496 U.S. 334 (more)
110 S. Ct. 2418; 110 L. Ed. 2d 312; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3012
Case history
Prior666 F. Supp. 1319 (D. Minn. 1987), affirmed, 880 F.2d 11 (8th Cir. 1989); cert. granted, 493 U.S. 1017 (1990).
Holding
Article I's plain language, read as a whole, establishes that Congress may authorize members of the National Guard of the United States to be ordered to active federal duty for purposes of training outside the United States without either the consent of a state governor or the declaration of a national emergency.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Case opinion
MajorityStevens, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. Art. I § 8

In 1986, after governors George Deukmejian of California and Joseph E. Brennan of Maine refused to allow the deployment of their states' National Guard units to Central America for training, Congress passed the Montgomery Amendment, which prohibited state governors from withholding their consent. Massachusetts governor Michael Dukakis had also challenged the law, but had lost in U.S. District Court in Boston in 1988.[1]

References

  1. David Evans (June 12, 1990). "SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS U.S. CONTROL OVER GUARD". Chicago Tribune.

Further reading

  • Beckman, Norman (1991). "Limiting State Involvement in Foreign Policy: The Governors and the National Guard in Perpich v. Defense". Publius. 21 (3): 109–123. doi:10.2307/3330517. JSTOR 3330517.
  • Bovarnick, Jeff (1991). "Perpich v. United States Department of Defense: Who's in Charge of the National Guard?". New England Law Review. 26: 453. ISSN 0028-4823.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.