Monica Puig career statistics

This is a list of career statistics of Puerto Rican professional tennis player Monica Puig since her professional debut in September 2010. Puig has won two WTA singles titles, including the gold medal in the women's singles tournament at the 2016 Summer Olympics.

Main article: Monica Puig

Performance timelines
Key
W  F  SF QF #R RR Q# A P Z# PO G F-S SF-B NMS NH
(W) Won; (F) finalist; (SF) semifinalist; (QF) quarterfinalist; (#R) rounds 4, 3, 2, 1; (RR) round-robin stage; (Q#) qualification round; (A) absent; (P) postponed; (Z#) Davis/Fed Cup Zonal Group (with number indication) or (PO) play-off; (G) gold, (F-S) silver or (SF-B) bronze Olympic medal; a (NMS) downgraded Masters Series/1000 tournament; (NH) not held. SR=strike rate (events won/competed)
To avoid confusion and double counting, these charts are updated at the conclusion of a tournament or when the player's participation has ended.

Only main-draw results in WTA Tour, Grand Slam tournaments, Fed Cup and Olympic Games are included in Win–Loss records.

Singles

Current through the suspension of the 2020 WTA Tour.

Tournament 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 SR W–L Win %
Grand Slam tournaments[1]
Australian Open A Q2 Q1 2R 2R 3R 2R 2R 1R A 0 / 6 6–6 50%
French Open A Q3 3R 1R 1R 3R 2R A 3R 0 / 6 7–6 54%
Wimbledon A A 4R 1R 1R 1R 1R 1R 2R NH 0 / 7 4–7 36%
US Open A Q1 1R 2R 1R 1R 1R 2R 1R 0 / 7 2–7 22%
Win–Loss 0–0 0–0 5–3 2–4 1–4 4–4 2–4 2–3 3–4 0–0 0 / 26 19–26 42%
National representation
Summer Olympics NH A Not Held G Not Held 1 / 1 6–0 100%
WTA Premier Mandatory tournaments
Indian Wells Open Q2 Q2 1R 1R 2R 3R 2R 2R 2R NH 0 / 7 6–7 46%
Miami Open A A 1R 2R 1R 2R 1R 4R 1R NH 0 / 7 5–7 42%
Madrid Open A A A Q1 1R 1R 1R 2R Q1 NH 0 / 4 1–4 20%
China Open A A 1R Q2 2R 1R Q2 Q1 1R 0 / 4 1–4 25%
WTA Premier 5 tournaments
Dubai / Qatar Open A A A A 1R A 3R A A A 0 / 2 2–2 50%
Italian Open A A A 2R 1R 2R 1R Q2 Q2 NH 0 / 4 2–4 33%
Canadian Open A A A 1R 2R 1R A 2R Q2 NH 0 / 4 1–4 20%
Cincinnati Open A A 1R Q2 Q1 A 1R Q1 1R 0 / 3 0–3 0%
Pan Pacific / Wuhan Open A A 1R 1R Q1 1R 3R QF 2R 0 / 6 6–6 50%
Career statistics[2]
Tournaments 1 2 15 19 23 25 21 14 19 0 Career total: 139
Titles 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Career total: 2
Finals 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 Career total: 4
Overall Win–Loss 0–1 0–2 13–15 16–18 15–23 41–24 20–21 18–14 17–19 0–0 2 / 139 140–137 60%
Year-end ranking 228 127 55 60 92 32 58 53 80 $3,411,976

Doubles
Tournament201320142015201620172018W–L
Grand Slam tournaments[1]
Australian Open A 1R 1R A 1R 2R 1–4
French Open A 1R 1R 1R A A 0–3
Wimbledon 1R 1R A 2R A 1R 1–4
US Open 1R 1R A 1R A A 0–3
Win–loss 0–2 0–4 0–2 1–3 0–1 1–2 2–14

Significant finals

Olympic finals

Singles: 1 (1 gold medal)
Result Year Tournament Surface Opponent Score
Gold 2016 Summer Olympics Rio Hard Angelique Kerber 6–4, 4–6, 6–1

WTA career finals

Singles: 4 (2 titles, 2 runner-ups)
Winner — Legend
Grand Slam tournaments (0–0)
WTA Tour Championships (0–0)
Summer Olympics (1–0)
WTA Premier Mandatory & 5* (0–0)
WTA Premier (0–1)
International (1–1)
Finals by surface
Hard (1–2)
Clay (1–0)
Grass (0–0)
Carpet (0–0)
Result W–L    Date    Tournament Tier Surface Opponent Score
Win 1–0 May 2014 Internationaux de Strasbourg, France International Clay Sílvia Soler Espinosa 6–4, 6–3
Loss 1–1 Jan 2016 Sydney International, Australia Premier Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova 0–6, 2–6
Win 2–1 Aug 2016 Summer Olympics Rio, Brazil Olympics Hard Angelique Kerber 6–4, 4–6, 6–1
Loss 2–2 Oct 2017 Luxembourg Open, Luxembourg International Hard Carina Witthöft 3–6, 5–7

ITF finals

Singles: 10 (6 titles, 4 runner-ups)
Legend
$100,000 tournaments
$75,000 tournaments
$50,000 tournaments
$25,000 tournaments
$15,000 tournaments
$10,000 tournaments
Finals by surface
Hard (4–3)
Clay (2–1)
Grass (0–0)
Carpet (0–0)
Result W–L    Date    Tournament Tier Surface Opponent Score
Win 1–0 Apr 2010 ITF Torrent, Spain 10,000 Clay Nanuli Pipiya 3–6, 6–1, 6–2
Win 2–0 Feb 2011 ITF Surprise, United States 25,000 Hard Lenka Wienerová 6–4, 6–0
Win 3–0 May 2011 ITF Chiasso, Switzerland 25,000 Clay Andrea Hlaváčková 7–6(7–4), 7–5
Win 4–0 Aug 2011 ITF San Luis Potosí, Mexico 10,000 Hard Nika Kukharchuk 6–3, 6–0
Loss 4–1 Oct 2011 ITF Bayamón, Puerto Rico 25,000 Hard Michelle Larcher de Brito 3–6, 2–6
Loss 4–2 Mar 2012 ITF Poza Rica, Mexico 25,000 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova 1–6, 2–6
Loss 4–3 Jun 2012 ITF Périgueux, France 25,000 Clay Irina Khromacheva 3–6, 2–6
Win 5–3 Oct 2012 ITF Joué-lès-Tours, France 50,000 Hard (i) Maria João Koehler 3–6, 6–4, 6–1
Win 6–3 Oct 2012 ITF Poitiers, France 100,000 Hard (i) Elena Vesnina 7–5, 1–6, 7–5
Loss 6–4 Dec 2012 ITF Ankara, Turkey 50,000 Hard (i) Ana Savić 7–5, 3–6, 4–6

Doubles: 1 (1 runner-up)
Legend
$100,000 tournaments
$75,000 tournaments
$50,000 tournaments
$25,000 tournaments
$15,000 tournaments
$10,000 tournaments
Finals by surface
Hard (0–0)
Clay (0–1)
Grass (0–0)
Carpet (0–0)
Result W–L    Date    Tournament Tier Surface Partner Opponents Score
Loss 0–1 Jul 2012 ITF Biarritz, France 100,000 Clay Lara Arruabarrena Séverine Beltrame
Laura Thorpe		 2–6, 3–6

Regional championship medal matches

Central American and Caribbean Games

Singles: 2 (2 gold medals)
Result Year Host nation Surface Opponents Score
Gold2010 Puerto Rico Hard Adriana Pérez 6–3, 6–2
Gold2014 Mexico Hard Ana Sofía Sánchez 6–2, 6–1

Mixed doubles: 1 (1 bronze medal)
Result Year Host nation Surface Partner Opponents Score
Bronze2010 Puerto Rico Hard Alex Llompart Chandra Capozzi
José Hernández-Fernández		 Tied

Pan American Games

Singles: 2 (1 silver medal, 1 bronze medal)
Result Year Host Nation Surface Opponents Score
Silver2011 Mexico Hard Irina Falconi 3–6, 2–6
Bronze2015 Toronto Hard Lauren Davis 2–6, 6–3, 6–3

Junior Grand Slam finals

Girls' Singles: 2 (2 runner-ups)
Result Year Tournament Surface Opponent Score
Loss 2011 Australian Open Hard An-Sophie Mestach 4–6, 2–6
Loss 2011 French Open Clay Ons Jabeur 6–7(8–10), 1–6

Record against top 10 players

Puig's match record against players who have been ranked in the top 10 of the WTA Singles Rankings (main draw results only, correct to 9 March 2020).

Player Record W% Hard Clay Grass Carpet Last Match
Number 1 ranked players
Naomi Osaka 2–0 100% 1–0 1–0 0–0 0–0 Won (6–3, 6–4) at 2016 Florianópolis
Angelique Kerber 3–3 50% 3–3 0–0 0–0 0–0 Won (7–6(7–5), 5–7, 6–1) at 2019 Wuhan
Caroline Wozniacki 3–3 50% 2–3 0–0 1–0 0–0 Won (7–6(12–10), 7–5) at 2018 Wuhan
Garbiñe Muguruza 1–1 50% 1–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (4–6, 0–6) at 2017 Tokyo
Victoria Azarenka 0–1 0% 0–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (2–6, 4–6) at 2016 Miami
Maria Sharapova 0–1 0% 0–0 0–1 0–0 0–0 Lost (3–6, 5–7) at 2014 Rome
Venus Williams 0–2 0% 0–1 0–1 0–0 0–0 Lost (4–6, 7–6(9–7), 3–6) at 2015 US Open
Karolína Plíšková 0–4 0% 0–2 0–0 0–2 0–0 Lost (0–6, 4–6) at 2019 Wimbledon
Number 2 ranked players
Petra Kvitová 2–1 67% 2–0 0–1 0–0 0–0 Lost (3–6, 6–7(8–10)) at 2018 Madrid
Svetlana Kuznetsova 0–2 0% 0–1 0–1 0–0 0–0 Lost (6–4, 5–7, 4–6) at 2016 Prague
Agnieszka Radwańska 0–2 0% 0–2 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (2–6, 3–6) at 2016 Tokyo
Number 3 ranked players
Nadia Petrova 1–0 100% 0–0 1–0 0–0 0–0 Won (3–6, 7–5, 6–4) at 2013 French Open
Elina Svitolina 1–2 33% 0–2 1–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (3–6, 3–6) at 2017 Brisbane
Sloane Stephens 0–1 0% 0–0 0–0 0–1 0–0 Lost (6–4, 5–7, 1–6) at 2013 Wimbledon
Number 4 ranked players
Francesca Schiavone 2–0 100% 1–0 1–0 0–0 0–0 Won (6–4, 7–6(7–4)) at 2017 Acapulco
Belinda Bencic 1–0 100% 1–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 Won (6–0 ret.) at 2016 Sydney
Caroline Garcia 2–1 67% 2–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (2–6, 6–1, 4–6) at 2018 US Open
Sofia Kenin 1–1 50% 0–0 1–0 0–0 0–1 Won (6–4, 6–4) at 2019 Charleston
Samantha Stosur 3–4 43% 3–2 0–2 0–0 0–0 Won (6–3, 6–4) at 2018 Miami
Dominika Cibulková 0–1 0% 0–0 0–0 0–1 0–0 Lost (2–6, 1–6) at 2016 Eastbourne
Kimiko Date-Krumm 0–2 0% 0–1 0–0 0–1 0–0 Lost (6–2, 4–6, 6–7(7–9)) at 2014 Birmingham
Johanna Konta 0–2 0% 0–0 0–0 0–2 0–0 Lost (1–6, 5–7) at 2016 Wimbledon
Number 5 ranked players
Sara Errani 4–0 100% 1–0 2–0 1–0 0–0 Won (6–0, 6–1) at 2019 Charleston
Daniela Hantuchová 1–1 50% 0–1 1–0 0–0 0–0 Won (6–0, 4–6, 6–0) at 2014 Rome
Eugenie Bouchard 0–2 0% 0–2 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (0–6, 4–6) at 2013 Tokyo
Jelena Ostapenko 0–3 0% 0–1 0–2 0–0 0–0 Lost (2–6, 6–3, 3–6) at 2017 Wuhan
Lucie Šafářová 0–3 0% 0–1 0–2 0–0 0–0 Lost (1–6, 4–6) at 2015 Dubai
Number 6 ranked players
Carla Suárez Navarro 1–5 17% 1–3 0–2 0–0 0–0 Lost (4–4 ret.) at 2018 New Haven
Flavia Pennetta 0–1 0% 0–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (3–6, 4–6) at 2014 Australian Open
Number 7 ranked players
Madison Keys 2–3 40% 0–0 2–2 0–1 0–0 Lost (4–6, 0–6) at 2019 Charleston
Roberta Vinci 1–2 33% 0–1 1–1 0–0 0–0 Won (6–3, 3–6, 6–2) at 2017 French Open
Number 8 ranked players
Ekaterina Makarova 0–1 0% 0–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 Lost (2–6, 4–6) at 2017 Washington D.C.
Number 9 ranked players
Andrea Petkovic 4–2 67% 2–1 2–1 0–0 0–0 Won (7–5, 6–2) at 2016 Charleston
Julia Görges 3–3 50% 0–2 2–0 1–1 0–0 Lost (6–1, 2–6, 3–6) at 2019 Luxembourg City
Timea Bacsinszky 1–1 50% 1–0 0–1 0–0 0–0 Won (7–5, 6–1) at 2018 New Haven
Aryna Sabalenka 1–1 50% 0–0 1–1 0–0 0–0 Lost (1–6, 6–3, 2–6) at 2019 Strasbourg
Number 10 ranked players
Daria Kasatkina 2–2 50% 1–1 1–1 0–0 0–0 Won (6–3, 6–1) at 2019 French Open
Kristina Mladenovic 1–2 33% 0–1 0–1 1–0 0–0 Won (7–6(8–6), 4–6, 6–3) at 2016 Eastbourne
Total 43–66 39% 22–37 17–19 4–9 0–1

Wins over top 10 players
# Player Rank Event Surface Rd Score MP Rank
2013
1. Sara Errani No. 5 Wimbledon, United Kingdom Grass 1R 6–3, 6–2 No. 65
2016
2. Garbiñe Muguruza No. 4 Summer Olympics, Brasil Hard 3R 6–1, 6–1 No. 34
3. Angelique Kerber No. 2 Summer Olympics, Brasil Hard F 6–4, 4–6, 6–1 No. 34
2018
4. Caroline Wozniacki No. 2 Miami Open, United States Hard 2R 0–6, 6–4, 6–4 No. 82
5. Caroline Garcia No. 6 Connecticut Open, United States Hard QF 7–5, 1–6, 6–2 No. 72
6. Caroline Wozniacki No. 2 Wuhan Open, China Hard 3R 7–6(12–10), 7–5 No. 51
2019
7. Aryna Sabalenka No. 10 Charleston Open, United States Clay 3R 6–2, 7–5 No. 63

See also

References
  1. "Grand Slam performances - Singles & Doubles".
  2. "Player & Career overview".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.