Hong Kong Palace Museum

The Hong Kong Palace Museum was a planned museum exhibiting artifacts of Beijing's Palace Museum in Hong Kong's West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD). Construction was planned to begin in 2017, with the museum scheduled for completion by 2022.[1]

Hong Kong Palace Museum
香港故宮文化博物館
The Palace Museum under construction in 2020.
Location within Hong Kong
LocationWest Kowloon Cultural District, West Kowloon, Hong Kong
Coordinates22.3021°N 114.1556°E / 22.3021; 114.1556
TypeArt and history museum
CollectionsArtifacts from the Palace Museum
ArchitectRocco Design Architects
Public transit accessKowloon Station
Hong Kong Palace Museum
Traditional Chinese香港故宮文化博物館
Simplified Chinese香港故宫文化博物馆

The decision to construct the museum, however, had generated much controversy and criticism from civil society, largely due to the Hong Kong government's failure to conduct a public consultation exercise beforehand.[2][3] The government subsequently launched a six-week consultation process where, instead of collecting views on whether the museum should be constructed, the public was merely invited to provide views on the museum's design and operation with a short questionnaire.[4]

Description
The model of the Planned Museum

The 328,000 square feet (30,500 m2) building will be designed by Hong Kong architecture firm Rocco Design Architects, who was directly appointed.[5] It will comprise two exhibition halls, activity rooms, a 400-seat theatre, a gift shop and a restaurant.[6] It will be built on the site of the West Kowloon Nursery Park.[5]

The museum will display artifacts borrowed from the Palace Museum in Beijing, some of which have never been displayed previously.[7]

Conception

Then Chief Secretary Carrie Lam stated that the idea of the museum was conceived during an event in Beijing in September 2015. She said that she asked the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust about funding the $3.5 billion project in December 2015, and that the request was approved by their board of directors in October 2016.[8]

Absence of consultation

Under the WKCDA Ordinance, Section 20, the Board established the Consultation Panel to gather public opinions on matters related to the functions of the Authority and to relate the views of the public. [9]

Deviation from previous practices

Despite the existence of this panel, the WKCDA failed to notify the Consultation Panel before announcing that it was going to build the Hong Kong Palace Museum. This deviated from previous practices which has previously involved conducting a public consultation on major land use and overall planning. Consultation Panel Member Ada Wong Ying-Kay announced that she only found out about the decision when the WKCDA announced it publicly. In late December, Chief Secretary Carrie Lam publicly announced that the Hong Kong government had agreed with Beijing's Palace Museum to build the Hong Kong Palace Museum at WKCD.[10]

In reaction, a group of activists started a petition which was signed by 14 civil groups and over 3,500 individuals, demanding a public consultation for the Palace Museum. Chief Secretary Carrie Lam failed to respond to the petition. The group of activist lodged a legal challenge against the government, stating that the government had violated Section 19 of the WKCDA Ordinance.[11] According to the Ordinance, the Authority is required to consult the public during the preparation of a development plan. Section 19 states the following:

Without prejudice to Section 21(3)(a), the Authority shall, in relation to matters concerning the development or operation of arts and cultural facilities, related facilities, ancillary facilities and any other matters as the Authority considers fit, consult the public at such time and in such manner as it considers appropriate.[12]

Section 21(30)(a), WKCDA Ordinance mentions the following:

In preparing a development plan, the Authority shall

(a) Consult the public at such manner as it considers appropriate; and

(b) Consult the Secretary for Home Affairs

The government decided to launch a six-week public consultation about the design and operation of the museum.[13] One hour before the consultation was scheduled to start, it was postponed. The Authority announced that it wanted to consolidate the responses to public concerns on various issues prior to the consultation.

William Waung Sik-ying, a retired High Court judge, commented on the Authority's attempt to ask for a public consultation with the following: “This is not a public consultation. Public consultation means that, if the public oppose it, the project will not go ahead. Can I choose that option? There is no such option.”[14]

Application of Section 19 of WKCD Authority Ordinance

Kan Tai-keung, Member of the WKCD Authority, mentioned that he was aware of the shortcoming of the WKCD Palace Museum project. Furthermore, he stated the following: “I understand the need for public consultation. But this is a special case that is impossible to do a public consultation on”.[15]

Ada Wong Ying-kay, Member of the Consultation Panel, said that community participation was essential: “So the project itself may not be bad, but the government has some explaining to do in how it came about and the subsequent process”. She stated that she believed the six-week consultation was not sufficient as compared to other consultation processes, which can take up to two years. She was afraid that consultation would keep drilling on the government for undisclosed details of the Palace Museum as new information was constantly being released.[16]

John Leong Chi-yan, Chair of the WKCDA Consultation Panel, said it was unfair to ask the public about the building of the Hong Kong Palace Museum during that time.[17]

Disruption to the year-long planning of the area

In his 1998 Policy Address, Tung Chee Hwa identified the need for a “performance venue on the West Kowloon reclamation” by committing to provide support to host world-class events, and as a catalyst for upgrading Hong Kong's image as Asia's entertainment capital.[18] The area where Hong Kong Palace Museum is to be built had previously been the planned site for a large performance venue, a facility called for by musicians for years. Having the museum at the expense of a performance venue received a strong reaction from the arts community in Hong Kong.

Cancellation of construction of a mega performance venue

Ng Cheuk-yin, a professional musician in the Consultation Panel of West Kowloon Cultural District, criticised the government for ignoring the year-long consensus on the construction of a large performance venue, saying “Hong Kong has never had a large professional performance venue and it was something we musicians held much hope for since it was mentioned in the original blueprint of the hub.”[19]

Ignorance of the public’s demand for a performance venue

Some lawmakers were also dissatisfied with the decision to abandon a mega performance venue. Tanya Chan, the deputy chairwoman of a Legislative Council panel on West Kowloon Cultural District, suggested that Section 19 of the WKCDA Ordinance stipulates that “the Authority shall, in relation to matters concerning the development or operation of arts and cultural facilities, related facilities, ancillary facilities and any other matters as the Authority considers fit, consult the public at such time and in such manner as it considers appropriate”[4], so bypassing public consultation to change the use of the land went against the intention of Section 19.[19]

Response from the WKCD Authority

However, the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority insisted in the Legislative Council Meeting that the decision not to proceed with a Mega Performance Venue was based on technical and business factors. Even if it was not the Hong Kong Palace Museum, something else will be planned on that site initially planned for a Mega Performance Venue. The Administration also stated that 28,000m^2 would be reserved for a multi-purpose convention and exhibition venue, as well as performances.[20]

The scrapping of a large performance venue was defended by Chris Ip Ngo-tung, a board member of the WKCD Authority, said preparation for Hong Kong Palace Museum had already been in place before the meeting in November 2016 when board members were briefed on the decision to construct the Hong Kong Palace Museum.[21]

In fact, in July 2016, then Chief Secretary Carrie Lam announced that the use of the northwestern harbour front site had been revised and a mega performance venue might have to make way for an exhibition centre, citing the need for Hong Kong to develop its exhibition industry.[22] However, this decision was criticised for overlooking the shortage of performance venues in Hong Kong. A justification of this accusation is that the Hong Kong Coliseum, which is one of the few venues that has the capacity to host large concerts, had an occupancy rate of 100% for 3 consecutive years between 2014/15 and 2016/17.[23]

Direct appointment of design consultant to HKPM

Together with the announcement of HKPM, Carrie Lam also announced the direct appointment of Rocco Yim and his firm as the design consultant in relation to the HKPM project. Lam explained that Yim was appointed due to a desire by the local architecture industry to have more local architects participate in the design of facilities in WKCD. As the HKPM did not involve the use of public funds, there was no need to engage in public consultation exercises before the appointment.

Initial response from stakeholders

However, critics doubted the legitimacy of the appointment process. Michael Lynch, former CEO of the WKCD Authority, criticised the direct appointment and noted that museums around the world rely on open tender or recruitment of designs by competition, even though they may not be state-funded.[24] Former President of the Hong Kong Institute of Architects Lam Kwong Ki said that while public organisations and government-subsidised organisations have the right to appoint architects directly, most projects involve open tenders or recruitment of designs by competition in order to ensure transparency of the process.[25] Kwan Siu-lun, convenor of concern group ArchiVision, called the appointment process “absurd” and said it removes the spirit of bottom-up planning of the WKCD.

Response from WKCDA

In response, the WKCDA issued a statement at midnight on 7 January 2017,[26] stressing the need for the project to remain confidential. It revealed that Yim was appointed to explore replacements for the original Mega Performance Venue and Exhibition Centre, including exploring options for “a multi-purpose venue for exhibition, convention, and performance purposes and a museum facility, and to come up with possible design concepts”. It further stated that it would release Yim's exploratory conceptual ideas for the HKPM in a public consultation exercise the following week.

Legislative Council hearing

In a special House Committee sitting on 6 January 2017, Carrie Lam admitted that very few people within the Hong Kong government were notified of the commencement of HKPM. When questioned on why the Authority appointed Yim directly, Lam admitted it was a “special” undertaking, and it was done because the Authority wished to meet the target to open HKPM by 2022.

Report filed to ICAC

On 9 January 2017, Legislative Council member Claudia Mo filed a case to the ICAC against Carrie Lam for misconduct in public office. The ICAC replied in March 2017 that it has set up a case to investigate the incident.[27]

Announcement

News of the museum was made public in a surprise announcement on 23 December 2016. On that day Chief Secretary Carrie Lam signed a cooperation agreement with the Palace Museum in Beijing.[28][29] The signing was witnessed by then Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying and Chinese culture minister Luo Shugang.[30] Leung commented, "This is the best and greatest gift to celebrate the 20th anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to the motherland", referring to the 2017 commemoration of the Handover.[6]

The new museum will display relics lent from the Forbidden City on a long-term basis. It will be managed by a subsidiary of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA).[6] The cost of construction is planned to be covered by a $3.5 billion donation from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.[30] The funding arrangement circumvents the need for the government to seek funding from the Legislative Council.[5]

Reaction and responses from different stakeholders

The announcement was controversial. Critics complained of the lack of public consultation. Others view the museum as an effort to increase Beijing's influence in Hong Kong and as a "political scheme" to foment patriotism.[5] This follows a year of political turmoil in Hong Kong surrounding Beijing's encroachment on the territory's rights and freedoms, including civil unrest in Mong Kok, government disqualification of certain candidates prior to the Legislative Council election, demonstrations in front of the Liaison Office in Sai Wan, and the ousting of democratically elected pro-independence legislators.[6]

Panel members

Ada Wong, who sits on the consultation panel of the WKCDA, said that the panel received no notification prior to the announcement of the new museum. She questioned the secrecy surrounding the project, asking: "If it is a good proposal, why didn’t they communicate with us sooner? [...] The government should tell us why it chose to inform Hong Kong people in this manner. It should explain why it didn’t begin the consultation process sooner, whether West Kowloon is the best site, and who will lead the project." She said she would not oppose the museum, but suggested that its content should be presented from a Hong Kong perspective.[2] Legislator James To said that the opacity of the project planning was "absolutely inappropriate" and undermined Hong Kong's autonomy.[5]

Scholars

Town planner Camille Lam criticised the direct appointment of Rocco Yim as architect without any design competition, as had been done with the M+ Museum, or open tender, as is common practice for other public buildings. She said that the public should be consulted as the government was changing the established plan for the WKCD, which was drawn up with extensive public consultation.[5]

Although exhibition was held at City Gallery to inform the public about the details of the project, it only consists of six double-sided display boards with a brief overview. It subsequently drew criticisms for not being informative enough. Civic Party lawmaker Tanya Chan said that the display boards told nothing about the size and proportion breakdown of the facilities. No helper was stationed to walk the visitors through the exhibit in person. She described the consultation process as ‘hastily thrown together’. Retired High Court judge William Waung, a Maritime Museum board member, commented that the display was “very bad” and there was no consultation practice at all. He said “This is not really a public consultation because a public consultation is [an exercise in which officials say] ‘if residents oppose it, we won’t do it’. But is there such a choice here?”[3]

Legal expert Johannes Chan point out that a legal grey area existed under the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority Ordinance. It stated that the public should be consulted on matters of the facilities, including the operation and development. He said it was questionable whether every project requires public consultation.[3]

Civil society groups

The group Articipants, which includes professionals from the drama, music and film industries, handed in more than 600 signatures to the consultation panel through an online petition in less than five days.[3]

On the other hand, a group called the Alliance in Support of Hong Kong Palace Museum was formed to support the idea. The convener, Fok kin-man, stated that the lack of consultation was so that the government could give the Hong Kong people a pleasant surprise.[1]

Responses from Carrie Lam

Regarding the direct appointment of Rocco Yim, Lam admitted that it was her “judgment and decision” to engage Yim to design the museum. But she denied having committed procedural impropriety. She claimed that “procurement policies of many governmental departments and organizations” give flexibility for direct appointment under special circumstances. The appointment of Yim as lead consultant was approved at a special board meeting and formally made by the authority's CEO Duncan Pescod. She believed Yim is knowledgeable about the West Kowloon Cultural District and has experience in building large museums.

She said “We conceive policy initiatives from time to time… and most of these exercises are done in a confidential manner until we are ready to disclose and announce, and then we listen to public opinion. That is the very usual way of doing government work.’[31]

Carrie Lam gave three reasons to respond to the criticisms regarding the lack of consultation. First, she said that the museum is located at West Kowloon Cultural District, which is already planned as cultural-use land. Therefore, there is no need for public consultation for the use of land. Second, West Kowloon Cultural District is managed by the statutory organization – West Kowloon Cultural District Board, but not the government. She admitted that her identity of Chief Secretary and the chief of the board would be confusing. However, she stressed that this project had gained the approval from the board according to the procedures. Third, she explained that there were many parties and stakeholders involved in the preparation process, including those form the central government, so it is hard to conduct public consultation. She said that if public consultation was started in earlier stage and one of the steps cannot gain public agreement, it will lead to an embarrassing situation. She took the example of 2007 where the China government gave two pandas to Hong Kong to illustrate that the government at that time didn't consult the public either. She believed the present case is the same situation.[32]

West Kowloon Cultural District Authority and its consultation panel

The West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCDA) is a statutory body established by the Hong Kong Government under the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority Ordinance (Cap. 601).[33] A partially commercial statutory body underwritten by government, the Authority manages its finances independently, and is dependent on government backing for capital expenditure.[34] It is governed by the 24-member Board of the authority, and is responsible for the planning, operation, development and maintenance of the facilities in the WKCD.[35]

Per Section 20(1) of the WKCDA Ordinance, a 16-member consultation panel was established and tasked to gather public views on the functions and performance of the Authority, and to perform public consultation exercises “at such time and in such manner as it considers appropriate”.[36] Section 20(3) of the Ordinance also provides the members of the Panel, including its chairman, are to be appointed directly by the Authority.[37]

The Authority’s and its Panel’s reaction and response

None of the members sitting in the Consultation Panel received prior notification of the government's decision to construct the Palace Museum.[4] Furthermore, no public consultation exercises were conducted by the government or the panel prior to the surprise announcement.[4]

In response to the apparent lack of consultation, Chairman of the Consultation panel Leong Chi-yan argued it would be “polarizing” to ask the public whether they favoured the construction of the museum, and David Pescod, CEO of the WKCDA, warned that Hong Kong might “lose a fantastic opportunity” if it decided against the museum's construction.[4][38]

This is not the first time the government failed to conduct public consultation in relation to the WKCD project. In September 2003, the government attempted to award he project to a single consortium unilaterally. This prompted strong opposition from the civil society, and eventually resulted in the government scrapping its original plan, and restart the design in February 2006.[39]

Controversies: Limitations of the Authority and its Panel

The inability of the authority and its panel in discharging their consultative functions in relation to the Palace Museum's construction can be explained by problems with their composition, statutory powers, and structure.

Biased Composition

According to the official webpage of the WKCDA, the authority and its panel comprises members representing the interests of different sectors of the community.[40] However, in practice, like many other advisory and statutory bodies, the membership of the WKCDA and its consultation panel is arguably dominated by the business and professional sectors.[41] For instance, the Chairman of the Authority, Henry Tang Ying-yen,[42] was questioned for his suitability for the role, due to his close ties with the business sector.[43] Given his business background, critics worry Tang would commercialize the WKCD project,[44] and that he might be unable to comprehend the interests and concerns of the cultural sector.[45] Also, concerns were raised as to whether the Chairman of the Consultation Panel Leong Chi-yan, who simultaneously served as the Chairman of the Hospital Authority, had sufficient time and expertise to steer the work of the Panel.[36]

Furthermore, only 2 members of the Board: Yip Wing-sie and Danny Yung, are considered “pioneers” of the cultural sector, whilst other members mainly represent the business sector, or professional sectors like legal and higher education etc.[46] Legislator Cyd Ho argued this means the Panel lacked members with expertise in arts and cultural policies, and management of arts and cultural resources.[36] This also ran counter to the government's promise that it would co-opt “anyone with ability and the commitment to serve the community” into its statutory and advisory bodies,[47] and that these bodies would foster public participation in public policy formulation.[48]

The biased composition of the WKCDA authority and panel had implications on the lack of consultation in the museum project. In the first meeting of the Consultation Panel following the government's surprise announcement, only one member in attendance, Ching Cheung-ying of the education sector,[49] explicitly and directly expressed concerns over the manner from which the proposal of developing the Palace Museum was conceived, and called for more transparency in the construction of the project.[38] Instead of raising concerns over consultation, other members mostly queried the details of the project itself, such as issues on the size of the venue, the transport of artifacts and security etc. Also, they supported the construction of the Palace Museum, and largely downplayed the lack of public consultation prior to the government's decision.[4] Therefore, steps should be taken to ensure the membership of the Authority and its Panel is balanced and representative of different sectors, so that the Panel would be more committed to civic engagement.

Limitations of the Panel’s role and functions

While the Consultation panel offer advises to the Authority as to its role and functions, the influence of the Panel in the policy process, just like many other statutory and advisory bodies, is not particularly significant.[41] This is because the Panel mainly assumes an advisory rather than an executive role, and the government is not obliged to respond to Panel members’ suggestions.[50] Furthermore, the Consultation Panel only hold meetings once or twice a year, further limiting the opportunities for the Panel to discharge its intended functions.[36]

The limitation of the Panel's role and functions accounted for its failure to conduct consultation exercises prior to the government's decision to construct the Palace Museum. During meetings of the Consultation Panel, the WKCDA Board repeatedly assured it would keep the public and the Panel informed of the implementation of the WKCD project.[51] However, the Panel has no authority to hold the Board accountable to its promises. Hence, the Board is free to renege on its assurance, and announce the Palace Museum project without notifying the Panel beforehand.

Statutory restrictions of the Panel

Furthermore, statutory provisions of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority Ordinance (Cap. 601) further limited the Panel's ability to discharge its consultative functions. Section 19 of the Ordinance provides the Panel should perform public consultation “at such time and in such manner as it considers appropriate”.[36][37] When lawmaker Helena Wong demanded an explanation for the Panel's failure to consult the public on the construction of the Palace Museum per Section 19 of the Ordinance, Secretary for Home Affairs Lau Kong-wah pointed out that Section 19 conferred the Panel flexibility in deciding whether a public consultation exercise is appropriate or not in the nature and circumstances of a given proposal. If the panel is required to consult the public on every single matter rigidly at a specific time and in a specific manner, the spirit of the ordinance would be undermined, and the Panel would fail to address the needs of different stakeholders.[52] As can be seen, statutory restraints produced inconsistencies in the Panel's consultative practices, and provided the Panel with an excuse not to consult the public even when decisions are likely contentious and debatable.

Lack of credibility in the appointment mechanism

According to Section 20 of the WKCDA Ordinance, members of the consultation Panel, including its chairman, are to be appointed by the Authority, whose membership is in turn appointed by the Chief Executive per Section 6(5) of the same Ordinance.[37] Also, like other statutory authorities, appointed members of the Authority and the Panel participate as individuals, and are not required to consult others in their respective sectors.[41] Taken altogether, this appointment mechanism created a possible conflict of interest, whereby the Chief Executive would be inclined to appoint members who share the government's vision on the WKCD project into the authority and the Panel. Members, on the other hand, are incentivized to show their loyalty to the government to secure an appointment. This cast doubt as to the ability of the Panel to “work independently from WKCDA, and have a free hand in steering the direction of its work”.[36]

The lack of credibility in the Panel's and Authority's appointment system influenced the Panel's failure to conduct public consultation. The government has long treated the WKCD as an infrastructural project, and has denied the development of cultural facilities required the prior stipulation of an arts and culture policy.[53] Hence, many of the government appointed Panel members likely shared similar views, and downplayed the significance of cultural facilities like the planned mega performance venue and exhibition centre which is to be replaced by the museum.[54]

Civic Engagement Process - Public Consultation Exercise on the Hong Kong Palace Museum

Timeline of the Civic Engagement process of the Hong Kong Palace Museum
Dates Events
23 December 2016 Then Chief Secretary Carrie Lam signed a cooperation agreement with the Palace Museum in Beijing under the witness of then Chief Executive CY Leung and the minister of Chinese culture Luo Shugang without prior public consultation.
9 January 2017 After receiving criticisms of the lack of consultation, the WKCDA launched a six-week public consultation regarding the design, operation and exhibition, but was postponed to 10 January 2017 due to “society is still having diverse opinions towards the proposal, and is concerned about the procedures”.[55]
11 January −
8 March 2017		 The consultation was extended for two weeks and was carried out in an exhibition format at the City Gallery in Central. The exhibition included nine design proposals, introducing to the public the ideas of the Palace Museum, as well as collecting public opinions regarding the construction, design, programs and teaching, and activities.[56]

There were two main channels in the consultation exhibition, including exhibition boards of both easy version and diagram-illustrated version, and surveys for opinion collection. An anonymous person reported to FactWire News Agency that “Dr. Rocco Yim, the designer of the Palace Museum appointed by the WKCDA and then Chief Secretary Carrie Lam, had already planned the external designs of the Museum, public consultation would therefore only be able to influence the internal arrangement of facilities.” [57]

12 January 2017 A consultation session was held among members of the WKCDA. Dr. Rocco Yim was also invited to the meeting. The discussion introduced the ideas of the Palace Museum, then focused on the operation and consultation exhibition of the museum. Daniel Ho Wing-cheung and Yolanda Ng Yuen-ting suggested that “more channels of consultation to engage the public should be conducted to gain support”.[38]
23 January 2017 A consultation session was held for experts from the architecture, engineering, planning, surveying, and other professional groups. The discussion focused on the site, internal design, sustainability of the museum. Mr. Rocco Yim explained the reason of lack of consultation, “public consultation should be conducted after the completion of the design.”[58]
26 January &
16 February 2017		 Two consultation sessions for experts from Arts and Culture sector were conducted. The discussions focused on the educational and cultural elements of the museum, including how to attract audience's attention and whether such museum can enhance general public's understanding towards Chinese cultures. A lawyer from the arts sector criticized that “the consultation panel failed to conduct consultation at the suitable time and that “holding consultation session after making the decision is illegal according to Article 19 of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority Ordinance.”[59][60]
20 February 2017 The second meeting was held among members of the WKCDA. The discussion focused on the transportation network near the museum and the financial expenditure of the construction. Mr. Duncan Warren Pescod had an opinion that “A two-month public consultation is reasonable and welcomed by the public, the WKCDA had actively encouraged the public to participate.”[61]
22 February 2017 The second meeting was held for experts from the Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Surveying, and other professional groups. The discussion focused on the site, design, construction and facilities of the museum.[62]
6 March 2017 A consultation session was held for the Arts and Culture-related Committees under 18 District Councils. The discussion covered the educational and cultural elements of the museum. However, the attendance is not satisfactory. Yolanda Ng Yuen-ting commented that “the invitation is not a sincere one because the invitation period by the WKCDA is too short.”[63]

Comments on the civic engagement process of Hong Kong Palace Museum

There were 22,224 visits to the consultation exhibition; 22,640 online visits of the project; 623 surveys received and 905 online responses received. 58 written submission covering opinions from 123 individuals, associations or groups were received. 1,805 face-to-face interviews were conducted in 18 districts.[64]

The participation rate is not satisfactory as Ada Wong Ying-kay, a member of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority Consultation Panel, said that she hoped the consultation will be serious and urged the public to take part rather than to severely criticize the project.[65]

However, regarding the announcement of the Hong Kong Palace Museum, Civic Party lawmaker Tanya Chan commented on the lack of prior notice and consultation, “It’s hard to believe what Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor said about having planned for a public consultation months in advance,” she said, describing it as “hastily thrown together”.[3]

She also commented on the insufficient information on the display and the low participation of the consultation exhibition that “There’s no information whatsoever on the size and proportion breakdown of the facilities. There’s not even anyone to walk me through the exhibit in person.”[3]

The retired High Court judge William Waung Sik-ying, a Maritime Museum board member and the first visitor of the exhibition, said the display was “very bad” as it offered little information and choice. This shows that the exhibition is unable to provide the public with comprehensive information.[3]

Regarding the surveys and online surveys conducted, seven questions about the facilities and types of exhibitions and programmes people would like to see were asked, but it does not touch on whether the museum should be built at all, or if it should be located in the West Kowloon Cultural District.[3]

An HKU law student, the founder of “Judicial Review Group” requested a judicial review on the construction of the Hong Kong Palace Museum. He deemed that the lack of consultation and discussion before the decision had violated the West Kowloon Cultural District Ordinance Section 61 Article 19. He submitted 3,560 and 14 petitions from individuals and social organizations to then Chief Secretary Carrie Lam and received no reply prior to the request of judicial review. He also deemed that conducting consultation after the decision was hasty and had violated procedural justice.[66]

See also

References
  1. Cheung, Karen (4 January 2017). "Gov't announces HK$3.8m TVB show on Palace Museum amid Hong Kong project controversy". Hong Kong Free Press.
  2. Ng, Ellie (28 December 2016). "Decision to build HK$3.5bn Palace Museum made without consultation, adviser reveals". Hong Kong Free Press.
  3. Cheung, Tony; Chou, Oliver; Ng, Naomi (11 January 2017). "Critics of Hong Kong Palace Museum on the attack as public consultation begins". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  4. Cheng, Kris (12 January 2017). "Unfair to ask public whether to build Palace Museum at this point, says head of consultation panel". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  5. Bland, Ben (3 January 2017). "Palace Museum row highlights Hong Kong-Beijing tensions". Financial Times.
  6. Qin, Amy (27 December 2016). "Planned Hong Kong Museum Will Showcase China's Imperial Relics". The New York Times.
  7. 香港故宮文化博物館部份展品未在故宮展出 (in Chinese). 881903.com. 28 December 2016. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
  8. Cheng, Kris (6 January 2017). "Palace Museum plan came from chat with Beijing head in 2015, says Chief Sec. at LegCo grilling". Hong Kong Free Press.
  9. Consultation Panel. West Kowloon. https://www.westkowloon.hk/en/the-authority/consultation-panel Retrieved on 2 December 2017.
  10. Decision to build HK$3.5bn Palace Museum made without consultation, adviser reveals. Hong Kong Free Press. 28 December 2016. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2016/12/28/decision-build-hk3-5bn-palace-museum-made-without-consultation-adviser-reveals/ Retrieved on 2 December 2017.
  11. Group to lodge legal challenge against new Hong Kong Palace Museum in West Kowloon. Hong Kong Free Press. 5 January 2017. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/01/05/group-lodge-legal-challenge-new-hong-kong-palace-museum-west-kowloon/ Retrieved on 1 December 2017
  12. “Section 21 Preparation of development plans, etc.” of Cap. 601 WEST KOWLOON CULTURAL DISTRICT AUTHORITY ORDINANCE. Hong Kong E-Legislation. https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap601?xpid=ID_1438403514519_004 Retrieved on 1 December 2017.
  13. Public to be consulted on operations and design of controversial West Kowloon Palace Museum. Hong Kong Free Press. 5 January 2017. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/01/05/public-to-be-consulted-on-operations-and-design-of-controversial-west-kowloon-palace-museum/ Retrieved on 29 November 2017.
  14. ‘This is not a public consultation’: Retired judge slams Hong Kong Palace Museum consultation. Hong Kong Free Press. 12 January 2017. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/01/12/not-public-consultation-retired-judge-slams-hong-kong-palace-museum-consultation/ Retrieved on 2 December 2017.
  15. Hong Kong Palace Museum public consultation delayed. South China Morning Post. 9 January 2017.
  16. Public participation on Hong Kong Palace Museum needed, but undisclosed details may overshadow process, advocate warns. South China Post. 9 January 2017.
  17. Unfair to ask public whether to build Palace Museum at this point, says head of consultation panel. Hong Kong Free Press. 12 January 2017. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/01/12/unfair-ask-public-whether-build-palace-museum-point-says-head-consultation-panel/ Retrieved on 12 January 2017.
  18. ”Tourism” Policy Address 1998. The HKSAR Government. https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/pa98/english/econ2.htm Retrieved on 1 December 2017.
  19. Hong Kong musicians lament loss of mega performance venue at site of Palace Museum. South China Morning Post. 15 January 2017.
  20. Joint Subcommittee t o Monitor the Implementation of the West Kowloon Cultural District Project Meeting on 29 May 2017 Background brief on the Hong Kong Palace Museum project. Legislative Council. 29 May 2017. http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr16-17/english/panels/wkcd/papers/wkcd20170529cb1-995-2-e.pdf Retrieved on 1 December 2017.
  21. Decision to build Hong Kong Palace Museum at West Kowloon Cultural District only revealed to board last month, member claims. South China Morning Post. 26 December 2016.
  22. Mega performance venue scrapped at long-delayed Hong Kong arts hub. South China Morning Post. 20 July 2016.
  23. Statistics Report. Leisure and Cultural Service Department. http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/en/aboutlcsd/ppr/statistics/cultural.html Retrieved on 2 December 2017.
  24. 連納智感意外：應做公眾諮詢. Singtao Daily. 30 December 2016.
  25. 嚴迅奇設計博物館富經驗. Singtao Daily. 27 September 2016.
  26. Press Statement from the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. The West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. 7 January 2017. https://www.westkowloon.hk/en/newsroom/news/press-statement-from-the-west-kowloon-cultural-district-authority Retrieved on 1 December 2017.
  27. 毛孟靜 (23 March 2017). 廉署立案查林鄭故宮館. Ming Pao Daily News (in Chinese).
  28. Cheng, Kris (29 December 2016). "No-one can reject charm of former imperial palace, says Chief Sec. during second China visit in a week". Hong Kong Free Press.
  29. "Hong Kong Palace Museum" (PDF). West Kowloon Cultural District (in Chinese). West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
  30. "Palace museum set for HK". Hong Kong Government. 23 December 2016.
  31. Ng, Ellie (11 January 2017). "Critics should not politicise the Hong Kong Palace Museum project, Chief Sec. Carrie Lam says". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  32. 林鄭用中國送大熊貓予港府作例　以三理由反駁建故宮館需諮詢公眾 (in Chinese). 852 Post. 26 December 2016. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  33. "About". West Kowloon Cultural Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  34. Scott, Ian (2003). "Organizations in the Public Sector". Public Organization Review: A Global Journa. Kluwer Academic Publisher. 3: 247–267.
  35. "Board". West Kowloon Cultural Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  36. "Joint Subcommittee to Monitor the Implementation of the West Kowloon Cultural District Project" (PDF). Legislative Council. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  37. West Kowloon Cultural District Authority Ordinance (Cap. 601)
  38. "Minutes of the 21st Meeting of the Consultation Panel of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority" (PDF). Consultation Panel of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  39. Chan, Elaine; Chan, Joseph (June 2007). "The First Ten Years of the HKSAR: Civil Society Comes of Age". The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 29 (1): 77–99.
  40. "Consultation Panel". West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  41. Cheung, Peter (2011). "Civic Engagement in the Policy Process in Hong Kong Change and Continuity". Public Administration and Development. Wiley Online Library. 31: 113–121.
  42. "Speeches of the Honourable Henry Tang Ying-yen, Chairman of the Board; Professor Stephen Cheung Yan-leung, Chairman of the Consultation Panel; Mr Graham Sheffield, Chief Executive Officer, at the Opening Ceremony of the Stage 2 Public Engagement Exercise". West Kowloon. West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  43. 【專訪】重掌西九被質疑傾斜商界 唐英年：我有經驗無私心 (in Chinese). Apple Daily Hong Kong. 28 September 2017. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  44. Ng, Naomi (18 September 2017). "Henry Tang becomes first non-official to head West Kowloon Cultural District Authority". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  45. "Letters to the Editor, September 28, 2017". South China Morning Post. 28 September 2017. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  46. 西九董事局換班 榮念曾出走 (in Chinese). Sing Tao Daily Hong Kong. 27 May 2014. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  47. "Policy Address". The Chief Executive's 2017 Policy Address. The HKSAR Government. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  48. "Strengthening Advisory and Statutory Bodies". Policy Address 2004. The HKSAR Government. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  49. "Mr CHING Cheung-ying, MH". West Kowloon Cultural District. West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  50. "Strengthen Deliberation Rebuild Trust — Improve the Systems of Advisory Committees and Public Engagement". Recent REsearch Reports. Hong Kong Vision. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  51. "Minutes of the 19th Meeting of the Consultation Panel of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority" (PDF). Consultation Panel of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  52. "LCQ1: Hatching of the project to develop a Hong Kong Palace Museum". Press Release. The HKSAR Government. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  53. Lee, Eliza; Chan, Joseph; Chan, Elaine; Cheung, Peter; Lam, WF; Lam, WM (2013). Public Policymaking in Hong Kong: Civic Engagement and State-society Relations in a Semi-democracy. Hong Kong: Routledge. p. 65. ISBN 0415576059.
  54. Hamlett, Tim (10 January 2017). "The Hong Kong Palace Museum deal: What's that smell?". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  55. 黃雲娜 (10 January 2017). 【西九故宮】諮詢押後至今午5時啟動　林鄭、嚴迅奇出席典禮 (in Chinese). HK01. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  56. 香港故宮文化博物館──公眾諮詢及展覽 (in Chinese). West Kowloon Cultural District. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  57. 傳真社取得西九故宮博物館設計圖 詳列8層展館設施分佈 (in Chinese). FactWire. 17 January 2017. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  58. "Consultation Session (Architectural, Engineering, Landscape, Planning and Surveying)" (PDF). Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  59. "Consultation Session (Arts and Culture)" (PDF). Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  60. "Consultation Session (Arts and Culture)" (PDF). Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  61. "Minutes of the 2wnd Meeting of the Consultation Panel of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority" (PDF). Consultation Panel of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  62. "Consultation Session (Architectural, Engineering, Landscape, Planning and Surveying)" (PDF). Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  63. "Consultation Session (Arts and Culture-Related Committees under 18 District Councils – Chairmen/ Vice-Chairmen)" (PDF). Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  64. "Outcome of the Public Consultation Exercise on the Hong Kong Palace Museum Project" (PDF). Legislative Council. Legislative Council. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  65. Cheung, Karen (9 January 2017). "Hong Kong Palace Museum consultation postponed amid criticism, as adviser urges public to take part". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  66. 挑機林鄭　港大生司法覆核西九建故宮博物館 (in Chinese). Oriental Daily. 5 January 2017. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.