Hill–Robertson effect

In population genetics, the Hill–Robertson effect, or Hill–Robertson interference, is a phenomenon first identified by Bill Hill and Alan Robertson in 1966.[1] It provides an explanation as to why there may be an evolutionary advantage to genetic recombination.

Explanation

In a population of finite size which is subject to natural selection, varying extents of linkage disequilibria will occur. These can be caused by genetic drift or by mutation, and they will tend to slow down the process of evolution by natural selection.[2]

This is most easily seen by considering the case of disequilibria caused by mutation: Consider a population of individuals whose genome has only two genes, a and b. If an advantageous mutant (A) of gene a arises in a given individual, that individual's genes will through natural selection become more frequent in the population over time. However, if a separate advantageous mutant (B) of gene b arises before A has gone to fixation, and happens to arise in an individual who carries A, then individuals carrying B will have reduced fixation probability. Provided there are no negative epistatic effects of carrying both, individuals of genotype AB will have a greater selective advantage than aB or Ab individuals, and AB will hence go to fixation. The reduced fixation probability of B will tend to produce an ensemble overabundance of Ab individuals -- an imbalance whose disadvantage can be ameliorated by recombination across populations or demes. [Note: This effect is often erroneously equated with "clonal interference", which happens when A and B mutations arise in different wildtype (ab) individuals and describes the ensuing competition between Ab and aB lineages.] [2]

Joe Felsenstein (1974)[3] showed this effect to be mathematically identical to the Fisher–Muller model proposed by R. A. Fisher (1930)[4] and H. J. Muller (1932),[5] although the verbal arguments were substantially different. Although the Hill-Robertson effect is usually thought of as describing a disproportionate build up of fitness-reducing (relative to fitness increasing) LD over time, these effects also have immediate consequences for mean population fitness.[6]

See also

References
  1. Hill, W. G.; Robertson, Alan (14 April 2009). "The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection". Genetical Research. 8 (3): 269–294. doi:10.1017/S0016672300010156.
  2. Hartl, D. L.; Clark, A. G. (2007). Principles of Population genetics (4th ed.). Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  3. Felsenstein, J (October 1974). "The evolutionary advantage of recombination". Genetics. 78 (2): 737–56. PMC 1213231. PMID 4448362.
  4. Fisher, R.A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  5. Muller, H. J. (March 1932). "Some Genetic Aspects of Sex". The American Naturalist. 66 (703): 118–138. doi:10.1086/280418.
  6. Crouch, Daniel J.M. (October 2017). "Statistical aspects of evolution under natural selection, with implications for the advantage of sexual reproduction". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 431: 79–86. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.021. PMID 28779948.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.