2017 Dow Tennis Classic – Doubles
Catherine Bellis and Ingrid Neel were the defending champions, but both players chose not to participate.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 Dow Tennis Classic | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6(7–1), 6–3 |
Ashley Weinhold and Caitlin Whoriskey won the title, defeating Kayla Day and Caroline Dolehide in the final, 7–6(7–1), 6–3.
Seeds
Madison Brengle / Tatjana Maria (First round) Ashley Weinhold / Caitlin Whoriskey (Champions) Naomi Broady / Irina Falconi (Semifinals) Verónica Cepede Royg / Montserrat González (Quarterfinals; retired)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | WC | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 63 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [2] | |||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [2]r | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 1r | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [3] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 61 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 1 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 0 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: Of course. Informal Toki Pona is too personalized.
gollark: I TOTALLY have no other ways to infer identity from text style.
gollark: Okay.
gollark: Are you attempting to deanonymize someone, beeeseaseeesese?
gollark: If I say something like "bees you, LITERAL apioform (this word is derived from the Latin "apis" and "forme". It is widely used on esolangs) utterly. This is due to bee" where does it split?!
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.