2012 Aegon Nottingham Challenge – Men's Singles

Dudi Sela was the defending champion, but he lost in the quarterfinals to Grega Žemlja.
Grega Žemlja won the title defeating Karol Beck in the final 7–6(7–3), 4–6, 6–4.

Men's Singles
2012 Aegon Nottingham Challenge
Champion Grega Žemlja
Runner-up Karol Beck
Final score7–6(7–3), 4–6, 6–4
Main article: 2012 Aegon Nottingham Challenge

Seeds
  1. Dudi Sela (Quarterfinals)
  2. Karol Beck (Final)
  3. Michael Russell (Second Round)
  4. Rajeev Ram (First Round)
  5. Marsel İlhan (First Round)
  6. Grega Žemlja (Champion)
  7. Jesse Levine (Semifinals)
  8. Rik de Voest (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
6 Grega Žemlja 6 77  
7 Jesse Levine 4 63  
6 Grega Žemlja 77 4 6
2 Karol Beck 63 6 4
  Izak van der Merwe 1 6 2
2 Karol Beck 6 2 6

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 D Sela 78 6  
  E Donskoy 66 1   1 D Sela 6 6  
Q R Bloomfield 6 6   Q R Bloomfield 2 4  
Q A Bury 2 4   1 D Sela 2 3  
  J Mertl 65 77 64 6 G Žemlja 6 6  
WC E Corrie 77 64 77 WC E Corrie 6 3 65
  R Berankis 4 6 4 6 G Žemlja 4 6 77
6 G Žemlja 6 4 6 6 G Žemlja 6 77  
4 R Ram 3 64   7 J Levine 4 63  
  J Duckworth 6 77     J Duckworth 6 1 77
Q A Bossel 6 6   Q A Bossel 2 6 64
WC L Bambridge 4 2     J Duckworth 4 5  
SE R Kendrick 6 7   7 J Levine 6 7  
Q S Bohli 4 5   SE R Kendrick 3 4  
  A Menéndez 4 66   7 J Levine 6 6  
7 J Levine 6 78  

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 M İlhan 6 64 4
  A Kuznetsov 4 77 6   A Kuznetsov 3 6 4
  M Teixeira 2 4     I van der Merwe 6 2 6
  I van der Merwe 6 6     I van der Merwe 6 6  
  A Mannarino 4 6 63 Y Sugita 3 4  
  Y Sugita 6 3 77   Y Sugita 4 6 6
  J Wang 6 4 65 3 M Russell 6 3 4
3 M Russell 2 6 77   I van der Merwe 1 6 2
8 R de Voest 6 6   2 K Beck 6 2 6
  D Udomchoke 3 2   8 R de Voest 3 2  
  J Janowicz 3 6 6   J Janowicz 6 6  
  L Grigelis 6 3 3   J Janowicz 3 710 61
WC J Goodall 6 6   2 K Beck 6 68 77
WC K Edmund 2 3   WC J Goodall 3 3  
  P Torebko 5 2   2 K Beck 6 6  
2 K Beck 7 6  
gollark: *An* issue is that sentencing can vary significantly based on judges' arbitrary opinions and how they are feeling. So maybe if you averaged over multiple judges once the facts of the case were determined it would help. Although there are a lot of ways for that to go wrong (messing with the framing of those and such).
gollark: Thank you for your somewhat misspelt tautology.
gollark: I doubt there's literally no way to fix it. Decoupling sentencing and judgement of guilt somehow, maybe.
gollark: Depends on what "psychological evaluation" actually means in practice.
gollark: I would assume it would be worsened if you fed in even more politically-relevant data.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.