2002 Betty Barclay Cup – Doubles
Cara Black and Elena Likhovtseva were the defending champions, but lost in semifinals to Martina Hingis and Barbara Schett.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2002 Betty Barclay Cup | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–1, 6–1 |
Martina Hingis and Barbara Schett won the title by defeating Daniela Hantuchová and Arantxa Sánchez Vicario 6–1, 6–1 in the final.
Seeds
Cara Black / Elena Likhovtseva (Semifinals) Daniela Hantuchová / Arantxa Sánchez Vicario (Final) Jelena Dokic / Conchita Martínez (Quarterfinals, withdrew due to a right hamstring strain on Dokic) Martina Hingis / Barbara Schett (Champions)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1 | 4 | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | 6 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 7 | 6 |
gollark: I agree that writing everything in intensely horrific JS is bad. I just don't think that much application software which is currently written in C would become worse if written in something safer and higher level.
gollark: I'm quite confident that the majority of user-facing ~~ones~~ computer systems have most of the development effort invested in random applications software which doesn't need to be hyperoptimized.
gollark: The top end grows, but most applications actually aren't that.
gollark: Computers are ridiculously powerful and more than capable of running most general purpose things anyone cares about very fast, if those things are sanely implemented. We know this because they can continue sort of usably working despite JS and such.
gollark: They're already very fast. Unless you're doing some very time sensitive data processing you can afford bounds checks and such in your code.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.