4
0
The organ is a truly epic instrument, being enormous, capable of outputting sound volume surpassing a whole symphonic orchestra… having multiple keyboards, including pedal keyboard, and additionally a number of switches or pulls of who-knows-what purpose…
Well, I had an idea to make a similarly epic instrument, ‘epic’ in terms of size, complexity, and power, however based on a grand piano, not on pipes. Does this idea of mine of ‘pumping up the piano’ make any sense musically?
- Assuming we just make an enormous grand piano, as large as the organ, would it be capable of producing interesting sound? Or would it be impossible for such large strings to play well? What about tuning? EDIT: OK, I get it that making the strings that huge is practically unfeasible. So, what about multiplying strings instead? Instead of making one huge string producing a particular sound, make a number of strings of normal size and put them in a row.
- One obvious problem is that the hammers of such a piano would have to strike the strings with enormous force… Hopefully however this problem is solvable, and in a number of ways: • by employing another person to pull some kind of a weight to give the instrument enough kinematic energy; • by including some wind-up mechanism to store the necessary potential energy for later use while playing; • by powering the instrument with a water turbine, wind turbine, with a little more advanced technology with a steam or gasoline engine, and nowadays, of course, with electricity?
- Would it make sense to add greater complexity to such a piano? For example, borrowing the idea of organ stops, combination actions, multiple keyboards, etc.,, we could include multiple sets of strings in such a piano, with each set producing a slightly different tone; and we could have one keyboard per set of stings. Each key could be connected to a number of strings, allowing us to control the exact sound of a note or even play whole chords with one keystroke; switches would control which strings are connected to which keys while playing. Like in organs, presets could be made and remembered either mechanically or electronically, and these presets could be switched while playing.
I guess the imagination can go ad infinitum here… yet such an instrument is absent in real life. Is it absent because no one has ever seen the need for it (especially taking into account how costly it would be to manufacture it, and how difficult would designing such an instrument be), or is it maybe absent because the whole idea makes no sense?

Do you want to try asking on [music.se]? – JDługosz – 2016-09-29T21:27:35.143
Based on factors like string length and the size of the piano, perhaps the only real way to make it sound "epic" without making a cumbersome monster is to build the enclosure differently to act as a sound box or natural amplifier. Don't forget the piano itself is based on the need to make the harpsichord create enough volume to fill a larger room, so strings were struck rather than plucked. – Thucydides – 2016-09-29T22:40:24.953
@Thucydides: I thought that the motivation for the development of the "pianoforte" (literally "quiet loud") was that it allows the loudness of notes to be varied. And for the OP, imagine mechanically-activated hammers striking the supporting cables of the Golden Gate Bridge :-) – jamesqf – 2016-09-30T04:36:40.667
The ability to vary the tone was a useful side effect of changing from plucking the strings to striking them, but the initial motivation as I understand it was to move from small chambers into larger ensembles playing in halls, requiring more volume. – Thucydides – 2016-09-30T05:28:56.583