3
I'm writing a story where a total nuclear WWIII occurs in the early 21st century. in a matter of minutes all of the world's nuclear powers unleashed their entire arsenals on each other in an event known as the Second Wave. Although it caused an unbelievable amount of damage in the short term (crop failure, a nuclear winter, annihilating our biggest cities, etc.), the biggest impact of it all came far after the end of the war.
After the initial nuclear blasts scattered fallout into our atmosphere, much of it fell on top of our ice caps as snow in the nuclear winter that followed. Over the course of the next 50 years, the radiation it created heated up the snow and ice; destabilizing the ice caps and accelerating sea level rise to levels that (at our current rate) we thought we wouldn't see until a few hundred years from now (most of the Earth's original coastlines are submerged, the Midwest is severely flooded by the expanded Mississippi River, the entire Florida peninsula is completely gone from the map, etc.).
Could a scenario like this really occur, and if so, how much damage could an event like this actually cause?
6You have things backwards. Nuclear winter would drop temperatures. – GrandmasterB – 2016-07-11T18:50:55.087
Some nukes could blow up at the poles due to faulty guidance maybe? – AndreiROM – 2016-07-11T18:57:20.667
I don't know if nuclear fallout produces thermal heat. If it did, I don't think you could have radioactive snow and icebergs...and nuclear winter. I think it is the actual initial blast etc that produces the heat that could vaporise ice. – EveryBitHelps – 2016-07-11T18:59:10.690
3No. Hard numbers aside, any heat produced by radioactive fallout spread over a large area is minuscule compared to threat that same amount of radiation would have to living beings. Enough fallout to produce any significant heat, would kill all life (even viruses) pretty quickly. Worse, the nuclear winter effect is many orders of magnitude greater than any heating effect, thus you'd cause an Ice Age long before you could melt any ice. – RBarryYoung – 2016-07-11T20:23:06.777
2I think you severely overestimate the radioactivity of nuclear fallout, and even more severely underestimate the energy required to melt ice. There is very little danger from the thermal effects of all the radioactive material we have available (mind you, a block of plutonium will burn you, but so will a wood fire). Don't forget that with all the radioactive matter on the whole planet, about 50 TW of heat is released (about fifth of the current estimated energy use of all of humanity). Compare to solar influx at 173 000 TW. – Luaan – 2016-07-12T08:09:40.387
maybe if you could spare some bombs to the active volcanoes and mega volcanoes like the yellow stone one. bt in the long term it will cause an ice age. – Sp0T – 2016-07-12T08:27:24.303