Dragons as stated with the ability to fly when young and with the ability to produce flammable gas are leading a quite high-energy lifestyle, which would require a large energy input. As they are carnivores, this dictates a certain lifestyle.
Cold-blooded carnivores are ambush predators. They excel at sitting still for long periods waiting for something unwary to happen by that they can catch and eat. Since they don't generate their own body heat, their baseline metabolic requirements are quite low.
Warm blooded carnivores have a higher energy requirement simply due to the fact that they must maintain their body temperature, typically above the ambient air temperature. This means that they must be more proactive in finding food, to the point where they actively hunt for their prey.
For a creature that must expend large amounts of energy flying and generating flammable gas, it seems unlikely that a cold-blooded metabolism could provide the capability to obtain sufficient energy input for their lifestyle.
This means that dragons must be - to some degree - able to regulate their own body temperature independent of the environment so as to be able to hunt in weather conditions that would not favor a cold-blooded animal.
All animals, whether homoeothermic or poikilothermic, require more energy input per unit mass when small than when they are large, and the gradients are identical, i.e. by increasing mass a certain amount, the energy requirement per unit mass goes down proportionally, regardless of whether the creature is homoeothermic or poikilothermic.
In addition, marsupials have lower energy requirements per unit mass than placental mammals of the same mass, but not as little as a poikilothermic creature, so it is not beyond the bounds of possibility for dragons (or dinosaurs) to be homeotherms and still have a lower energy requirement than a placental mammal.
Other strategies employed by mammals to reduce energy expenditure are sleep (practiced by cats) and hibernation (practiced by bears and rodents). The ability to spend long periods sleeping or hibernation would fit well with some popular representations of dragons.
In conclusion, I would suggest that dragons are most likely to be lower-metabolism homeotherms (i.e. warm blooded) than placental mammals with a propensity to long periods of sleep and hibernation.
I do agree with @MontyWild that with knowledge in biology (in which I too have a degree), the amount of possible solutions is quite small. This question was closed when it actually was more poorly defined but should now be reopened. – Sheraff – 2014-09-30T23:04:09.747
Agreed. This can be worked through biologically to a "most likely" scenario. – James – 2014-10-06T14:16:36.603
So we reopen it? – Sheraff – 2014-10-06T14:22:46.030
lol I'd think to vague. cold blooded vs warm blooded are two vague categories that we've come up with to describe the current animal life on Earth...we've proven the dinosaurs clearly exist in neither and several creatures are kinda on the blurred lines of these categories. We've said all animals are either apples or oranges (or orange apple hybrids) and this question comes down to a debate as to weather or not a banana fits in the same category as an apple or an orange ;) – Twelfth – 2014-10-07T23:39:10.060
5While this is an interesting question is's also impossible to answer. As mythical beasts dragons could be either or something else entirely. The question needs to be much more specific. – Tim B – 2014-09-22T12:46:19.273
I believe with scientific arguments, the "most likely" case can be determined. @WayneWerner's answer is a good example: cold blooded requires less food intake and fits with the ability to produce fire. – Sheraff – 2014-09-22T12:50:58.437
General reference questions tend to get really vague answers, while good answers to specific questions give enough information that they can be generalised to other situations. Without a specific context or goal, this is basically an exercise in who can make the most convincing-sounding justification. The one answer given so far says exactly that: without a specific context for the dragon (habits, environment, behaviour, diet, etc.) we can invent any biology to justify any answer. – BESW – 2014-09-22T12:52:25.007
@BESW, Yeah I had linked to a previous question giving all this info but i guess it makes more sense to rewrite it here as well... – Sheraff – 2014-09-22T12:57:38.130
Linking to the previous question is less than helpful. Do you mean to point to the answer with the most votes, or the accepted answer? What climate are the dragons in? Do they hibernate? And so forth. – BESW – 2014-09-22T12:59:23.513
1@FlorianPellet The problem is that we are discussing hypothetical creatures in a hypothetical environment under hypothetical constraints. The result is an incredibly broad discussion with no real possible resolution. – Tim B – 2014-09-22T12:59:57.927
@FlorianPellet we're discussing this in the chat now if you want to join - http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/17213/worldbuilding
– Tim B – 2014-09-22T13:02:53.550It's impossible to answer this question, you can say whatever you want. – DonyorM – 2014-09-22T15:22:35.347
5As someone with a degree in physiology and zoology amongst other subjects, I disagree that this question is too broad. The problem is well defined, with a narrow range of scientifically plausible solutions, which I have detailed in my answer. Are there any others here prepared to claim similar real-world expertise who want to disagree with me? – Monty Wild – 2014-09-22T16:11:16.690
In addition to my personal perception that this is not primarily opinion based (due to the specifically requested scientific nature of the answers), this is also now just as well defined as this question which has not been closed.
– trichoplax – 2014-09-23T07:56:11.650