5
1
In my scenario, a tremendous war wipes most of the humanity. While pockets survive here and there, the biggest part lives in one city, totaling around 3000 to 5000 survivors. It is also important to mention that :
- Most buildings are in a very bad shape or crumbling, except one fortified place with a farm capable to feed thousands easily.
- There is a source of virtually unlimited power.
- The technology is basically 1990s, with an excellent medical and military knowledges that surpasses easily our own.
- There is no nuclear winter, radiation, or anything preventing people from living on the surface, but the flora is very prolific.
In such scenario, would the group be able to recreate a society and survive for more than a thousand of years, and develop space-related technologies? (i.e. being able to launch a station in space)
Thank you a lot for reading this and helping me out! :-)
1
I'm pretty sure we've had some questions relating to this before. For example, What is the minimum human population necessary for a sustainable colony? could be considered a duplicate of this. Or try searching the site for "population size" and similar terms. I can't find an outright duplicate of this right now, but that might allow you to better focus the question so that it isn't a duplicate of any existing question.
– a CVn – 2015-04-16T11:52:22.063In terms of genetics and biology, there would be no issue with such a population recreating human society, but I assume that isn't the main issue here. – Orfby – 2015-04-16T12:23:37.563
Thank you, @MichaelKjörling; I tried to find such a question, but my keywords weren't good! I will read the thread. :) – Docteur – 2015-04-16T13:21:22.470
A LOT of.......'recreational' activity ;-) – JDSweetBeat – 2015-04-16T14:00:15.097
Would you mind elaborating on the "prolific flora"? – SF. – 2015-04-16T15:55:47.260
It is a typical west european flora (temperate climate), but they grow in increased number at increased speed. – Docteur – 2015-04-16T23:01:37.640