Actually, it's probably more accurate to say that men could only fly if they developed 'breasts'.
Not in the female sense of course, but the fact is that female breasts sit more or less neatly over the pectoral muscles of the chest. Assuming that your flight mechanism is similar to birds and that wings are formed from arms and hands like in birds, it's the pectoral muscles that are going to do all the real work.
Modern day birds are not evolved from pterasaurs; they're evolved from therapods, like velociraptor. This is because they used their front arms to grab, and developed very strong muscles in their chests to drive their claws at their prey. Eventually, those muscles were used not only to repeatedly strike at other creatures but to flap the arms, which become wings, and the therapods take flight.
This is also why breast meat on chickens and turkeys is the lowest fat but largest single body of muscle on the bird - it's the part of the bird that really powers flight.
It is further important to note that all other things being equal, women are in no way restricted from developing their pectoral muscles to the same extent as men just because of their breasts. Men or women capable of flight in the same manner as birds are would have greatly developed pectoral muscles, which (according to most commentators on the subject) would make both genders more attractive without reducing breast size in women at all.
7Do breasts make bat powered flight harder? – A. I. Breveleri – 2018-12-25T04:10:46.940
This is a bit of a mess! You're asking too many questions per query. Please edit and focus on one singe issue or problem within one focused query. Take a look at the [help] and [tour] so you can get an idea how SE works. Also: breasts do not weigh anything like what you seem to think they weigh. A whopper might be a couple kilos. All things being equal, you could whack em right off and the poor girl won't be able to get her totally unsuited for flight human body in the air! – elemtilas – 2018-12-25T05:56:00.830
6
To illuminate one of life's great mysteries for you: a human female breast usually weighs between 500 grams and 1 kilogram. Smaller and larger weights are no uncommon. And there is no indication whatsoever that human females have lower mobility in their arms than human males.
– AlexP – 2018-12-25T12:31:33.7071Welcome to WB.SE. Please note that SE's basic model is one-specific-question/one-best answer. We're lenient with newcomers, but bear that in mind for the future. Please note that this question is silly because it could as easily be asked, "would the weight of the human make human flight more difficult?" The answer is, of course, "of course." Small breasts won't matter. Large breasts might. So would eating a lot of donuts. – JBH – 2018-12-25T17:41:06.740
1@299 Neandertal Variants You do too have breasts, they're just underdeveloped. – TheLeopard – 2018-12-26T00:05:48.723
1A good point to think about is that most females, even the ones with ample bosoms, usually weight less than average males. A proper suit to hold "stuff in place" would be far more useful than cutting the breasts off. – T. Sar – 2018-12-26T09:52:34.173
They are not breasts they are flight muscles. – John – 2018-12-26T15:09:07.057
They are not breasts they are in-flight refuelling systems for infant flyers. – TheLeopard – 2018-12-27T01:23:02.277