Sutter Creek
Sutter Creek is a city in Amador County, California.
Understand
- Sutter Creek Visitor Center, 11A Randolph St, ☎ +1 209-267-1344. weekends 10AM-3PM.
Get in
Get around
By bus
Amador Transit provides bus service. Their phone number is: +1 209 267-9395. The main transit center is at Sutter Hill.
See
- Black Chasm Cavern.
- Sutter Creek Visitor Center.
- Monteverde Store Museum.
- Chaw'se Indian Grinding Rock.
Do
Buy
- J. Monteverde General Store, 3 Randolph St. A 1900s-style general store with vintage goods displayed.
Eat
- Sutter Creek Palace, 76 Main St, ☎ +1 209-267-1300.
- Susan's Place Wine Bar & Eatery, 15 Eureka St, ☎ +1 209-267-0945.
Drink
Sleep
- 🌍 Days Inn Sutters Creek, 271 Hanford St, ☎ +1 209 267-9177.
- The Foxes Inn of Sutter Creek, 77 Main St, ☎ +1 209-267-5882. Victorian bed and breakfast.
Connect
Go next
Routes through Sutter Creek |
Auburn ← Amador City ← | N |
→ Jackson → Oakhurst |
gollark: The advantage of XTMF is that your tapes would be playable by any compliant program for playback, and your thing would be able to read tapes from another program.
gollark: Tape Shuffler would be okay with it, Tape Jockey doesn't have the same old-format parsing fallbacks and its JSON handling likely won't like trailing nuls, no idea what tako's program thinks.
gollark: Although I think some parsers might *technically* be okay with you reserving 8190 bytes for metadata but then ending it with a null byte early, and handle the offsets accordingly, I would not rely on it.
gollark: Probably. The main issue I can see is that you would have to rewrite the entire metadata block on changes, because start/end in XTMF are offsets from the metadata region's end.
gollark: I thought about that, but:- strings in a binary format will be about the same length- integers will have some space saving, but I don't think it's very significant- it would, in a custom one, be harder to represent complex objects and stuff, which some extensions may be use- you could get some savings by removing strings like "title" which XTMF repeats a lot, but at the cost of it no longer being self-describing, making extensions harder and making debugging more annoying- I am not convinced that metadata size is a significant issue
This article is issued from Wikivoyage. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.