Zucht v. King

Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 (1922), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that the school district of San Antonio, Texas, could constitutionally exclude unvaccinated students from attending the schools in the district.[1]

Rosalyn Zucht, W. A. King, et al.
Argued October 20, 1922
Decided November 13, 1922
Full case nameZucht v. King
Citations260 U.S. 174 (more)
43 S. Ct. 24; 67 L. Ed. 194
Holding
School districts could constitutionally exclude unvaccinated students.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
Willis Van Devanter · Mahlon Pitney
James C. McReynolds · Louis Brandeis
George Sutherland
Case opinion
MajorityBrandeis, joined by unanimous

Opinion

The city of San Antonio, Texas, enacted an ordinance prohibiting any child from attending a public school or other places of education without having first presented a certificate of vaccination for smallpox. Consequently, Rosalyn Zucht was excluded from both public and private schools due to her refusal to receive a vaccination. Zucht sued, asserting that there was no emergency requiring vaccination and that she was deprived of liberty without due process of law by effectively making vaccination compulsory. The Texas state courts denied her claims, and she appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

In a brief opinion, the Court noted that in the previous case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the Court "had settled that it is within the police power of a state to provide for compulsory vaccination". The Court found no reason to question the fairness with which the city ordinance was applied in this case, and found that the ordinance reflected the broad discretion needed by authorities to protect the public health. The Court also noted that although the plaintiff asserted an equal protection violation, she had not articulated any impermissible discrimination that would invoke that doctrine, leaving nothing for the Court to examine with respect to such a claim.

gollark: Preparing apiaristic forms...
gollark: ++delete <@356107472269869058>
gollark: I """"know"""" German slightly, and also Latin and Ancient Greek but nobody speaks those unironically.
gollark: But I don't know any other languages well enough to use them.
gollark: I think I have better knowledge of the grammar rules and such than a lot of native speakers might.

See also

References
  1. Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 (1922).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.