Zariski tangent space

In algebraic geometry, the Zariski tangent space is a construction that defines a tangent space at a point P on an algebraic variety V (and more generally). It does not use differential calculus, being based directly on abstract algebra, and in the most concrete cases just the theory of a system of linear equations.

Motivation

For example, suppose given a plane curve C defined by a polynomial equation

F(X,Y) = 0

and take P to be the origin (0,0). Erasing terms of higher order than 1 would produce a 'linearised' equation reading

L(X,Y) = 0

in which all terms XaYb have been discarded if a + b > 1.

We have two cases: L may be 0, or it may be the equation of a line. In the first case the (Zariski) tangent space to C at (0,0) is the whole plane, considered as a two-dimensional affine space. In the second case, the tangent space is that line, considered as affine space. (The question of the origin comes up, when we take P as a general point on C; it is better to say 'affine space' and then note that P is a natural origin, rather than insist directly that it is a vector space.)

It is easy to see that over the real field we can obtain L in terms of the first partial derivatives of F. When those both are 0 at P, we have a singular point (double point, cusp or something more complicated). The general definition is that singular points of C are the cases when the tangent space has dimension 2.

Definition

The cotangent space of a local ring R, with maximal ideal is defined to be

where 2 is given by the product of ideals. It is a vector space over the residue field k := R/. Its dual (as a k-vector space) is called tangent space of R.[1]

This definition is a generalization of the above example to higher dimensions: suppose given an affine algebraic variety V and a point v of V. Morally, modding out 2 corresponds to dropping the non-linear terms from the equations defining V inside some affine space, therefore giving a system of linear equations that define the tangent space.

The tangent space and cotangent space to a scheme X at a point P is the (co)tangent space of . Due to the functoriality of Spec, the natural quotient map induces a homomorphism for X=Spec(R), P a point in Y=Spec(R/I). This is used to embed in .[2] Since morphisms of fields are injective, the surjection of the residue fields induced by g is an isomorphism. Then a morphism k of the cotangent spaces is induced by g, given by

Since this is a surjection, the transpose is an injection.

(One often defines the tangent and cotangent spaces for a manifold in the analogous manner.)

Analytic functions

If V is a subvariety of an n-dimensional vector space, defined by an ideal I, then R = Fn/I, where Fn is the ring of smooth/analytic/holomorphic functions on this vector space. The Zariski tangent space at x is

mn / ( I+mn2 ),

where mn is the maximal ideal consisting of those functions in Fn vanishing at x.

In the planar example above, I = F, and I+m2 = <L>+m2.

Properties

If R is a Noetherian local ring, the dimension of the tangent space is at least the dimension of R:

dim m/m2 ≧ dim R

R is called regular if equality holds. In a more geometric parlance, when R is the local ring of a variety V in v, one also says that v is a regular point. Otherwise it is called a singular point.

The tangent space has an interpretation in terms of homomorphisms to the dual numbers for K,

K[t]/t2:

in the parlance of schemes, morphisms Spec K[t]/t2 to a scheme X over K correspond to a choice of a rational point x ∈ X(k) and an element of the tangent space at x.[3] Therefore, one also talks about tangent vectors. See also: tangent space to a functor.

gollark: It's described in terms of maths. I can't randomly conjure physical laws into existence by mathematically describing them.
gollark: > I think I will use politicians -- oh, wait, that's already happening.Politicians are NOT destroying the Earth. That would require directed and focused effort.
gollark: That seems like one of those not-actually-meaningful fake profound things.
gollark: https://qntm.org/destroy
gollark: This is apparently limited to some lowish % of light speed due to energy lost decelerating the hydrogen.

See also

References

  1. Eisenbud 1998, I.2.2, pg. 26
  2. Smoothness and the Zariski Tangent Space, James McKernan, 18.726 Spring 2011 Lecture 5
  3. Hartshorne 1977, Exercise II 2.8

Books

  • Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157
  • David Eisenbud; Joe Harris (1998). The Geometry of Schemes. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98637-5.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.