World Archaeology
World Archaeology is a peer-reviewed academic journal covering all aspects of archaeology. It was established in 1969 and originally published triannually by Routledge & Kegan Paul. In 2004 it changed to a quarterly publication schedule while remaining under the Routledge imprint.
 | |
| Discipline | Archaeology |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | Alan K. Outram |
| Publication details | |
| History | 1969–present |
| Publisher | |
| Frequency | Quarterly |
| Standard abbreviations | |
| ISO 4 | World Archaeol. |
| Indexing | |
| CODEN | WOAREN |
| ISSN | 0043-8243 (print) 1470-1375 (web) |
| LCCN | 75646489 |
| JSTOR | 00438243 |
| OCLC no. | 48535549 |
| Links | |
Each of the year's first three issues within a volume are dedicated to specific individual themes and topics within archaeology, and contributions address the topic from a variety of perspectives. The fourth and last issue of the year has been given over to coverage of current debates within archaeology, in which papers discuss significant issues and global concerns in the field.
Abstracting and indexing
The journal is abstracted and indexed in:
- Abstracts in Anthropology
- America: History and Life
- Anthropological Index Online
- Anthropological Literature
- Art Index
- Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals
- Bibliography of the History of Art
- Bibliography of Native North Americans
- British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography
- British Humanities Index
- Scopus
- GEOBASE
- Historical Abstracts
- Humanities Index
- Humanities International Index
- Index Islamicus
- International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
- Linguistic Bibliography
- New Testament Abstracts
- ProQuest Central
- Religion Index One
- Arts and Humanities Citation Index
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
gollark: What's the alternative? Science is at least *slightly* empirical and right. Also, the video is wrong.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.