White House visitor logs

White House visitor logs, also known as the White House Worker and Visitor Entry System (WAVE), are the guestbook records of individuals visiting the White House to meet with the President of the United States or other White House officials.

History

The release of some logs to the public have been a goal of, and can be credited to the pressure from, watchdog groups concerned with possible undue influence of lobbyists over the US government.[1] Groups such as Judicial Watch, CREW, and The National Security Archive have been suing the government to release such logs under the Freedom of Information Act since at least the early 2000s.[2][3] The Clinton and Bush administrations refused to release visitor records to the public, arguing they are part of presidential communications and not public records.[1] The Obama administration, however, after initially following the same policy,[4] eventually reversed it and by mid-2009 released the visitor logs as part of its stated commitment to government transparency, under the White House Voluntary Disclosure Policy.[5] It was the first US administration to release those logs to the public.[6][7] The logs were nonetheless redacted to remove sensitive meetings (such as visits by potential Supreme Court nominees) and purely personal guests.[5][8] Logs for the period between January 20 and September 15, 2009, are subject to different policy and require specific requests.[8]

The Trump administration withdrew its support for release of the logs, and is not making visitor logs available to the public, though some comments suggest the logs could be made available "five years after Trump leaves office".[9][10][10] This has led to several groups suing the government again, demanding the release of such logs, which should be seen as a matter of public record.[11][10][12]

Analysis
David M. Cote (Chairman and CEO of Honeywell International) was the most frequent business visitor to the White House during the Obama administration.

While Obama's release of the logs was generally praised by transparency activists,[1] the Sunlight Foundation noted, "The voluntary system can be too easily circumvented. Because it only captures visitors to the White House, if an administration official wishes to keep a meeting with a lobbyist secret, he or she merely has to schedule it at a nearby location" and "Phone calls are also used to avoid disclosure".[13] Omission of significant visits was criticised by other groups.[3] Time noted that "The Obama-era process allowed the White House Counsel’s office to unilaterally redact records of those visiting the complex for any reason. The Obama Administration, for instance, took a wide-ranging view of what were considered personal events hosted by the Obamas, leaving off celebrity sightings and meetings with top donors." The visitors could request to have their records shielded from public through a simple checkbox on the visitor form.[10]

A 2017 study showed that companies whose executives have met the president report a raise of their share values, by approximately 0.5% following a month or two after the disclosure of the meeting. The authors note that direct causation is difficult to prove, but it is likely that investors view such news as indication that companies will perform better, for example winning more government procurement contracts.[9][5] That study identified 2,286 meetings between corporate executives and federal government officials with the top three most frequent visitors for that period being David M. Cote (Chairman and CEO of Honeywell International, 30 visits), Jeffrey R. Immelt (Executive Chairman and CEO of General Electric, 22 visits) and Roger C. Altman (Executive Chairman of EverCore Partners, 21 visits).[5] The top three most frequent visitees by corporate executives in that period were Valerie Jarrett (Senior Advisor to the President, 107 visits), Jeff Zients (Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Director of the National Economic Council, 103 visits), and the President himself (100 visits).[5]

gollark: When was this?
gollark: Wait, you built a road?
gollark: Preapproval is required for new road construction.
gollark: No, the road came after my base did.
gollark: And I didn't build my base at the end of the road.

See also

References
  1. "White House Publishes 5.02 Million Visitor Access Records". www.govtech.com. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  2. "Secret Service Must Produce Some White House Records – Bloomberg". 2016-11-15. Archived from the original on 2016-11-15. Retrieved 2017-06-20.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  3. "White House visitor logs riddled with holes". Center for Public Integrity. 2011-04-13. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  4. "Obama blocks list of visitors to White House". msnbc.com. 2009-06-16. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  5. Brown, Jeffrey; Huang, Jiekun (April 2017). "All the President's Friends: Political Access and Firm Value". NBER Working Paper No. 23356. doi:10.3386/w23356.
  6. "More than 5.02 Million Records Released". whitehouse.gov. 2015-12-30. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  7. "Statement from the President on the First Time Disclosure Policy for White House Visitor Logs | whitehouse.gov". 2017-01-18. Archived from the original on 2017-01-18. Retrieved 2017-06-20.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  8. "White House Voluntary Disclosure Policy Visitor Access Records". whitehouse.gov. 2015-08-27. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  9. "When bosses visit the White House, their firms make more money". The Economist. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  10. Miller, Zeke J. "The White House Will Keep Its Visitor Logs Secret". Time. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  11. "As Trump Continues Mar-A-Lago Trips, Watchdogs Want To Know Who's Joining Him". NPR.org. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  12. Lauren Harper, ed. (July 27, 2018). "Breaking News: Judge Lets Secret Service Hide White House Visitor Logs". National Security Archive. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
  13. "Disclose All Lobbyist Meetings With White House Staff". Sunlight Foundation. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.