Whately Chair of Political Economy
The Whately Chair of Political Economy was established at Trinity College, Dublin by Richard Whately, in 1832. It was initially tenable for five years.[1]
Holders
- 1832 Mountifort Longfield
- 1836 Isaac Butt
- 1840 James Anthony Lawson
- 1846 William Neilson Hancock
- 1851 Richard Hussey Walsh
- 1856 John Elliot Cairnes
- 1861 Arthur Houston[2]
- 1866 J. Slattery[3]
- 1871 Robert Cather Donnell[4]
- 1876 James Johnston Shaw
- 1882–1932 Charles Francis Bastable, whose tenure saw a change of system.[1]
- 1934–1967 George Duncan[5]
- 1967–1979 Louden Ryan
- 1979–2004 Dermot McAleese[6][7]
- Philip Richard Lane, current holder[8]
Notes
- Thomas Boylan; Tadhg Foley (8 August 2005). Political Economy and Colonial Ireland: The Propagation and Ideological Functions of Economic Discourse in the Nineteenth Century. Routledge. p. 165. ISBN 978-1-134-92040-2.
- Thomas Boylan; Tadhg Foley (8 August 2005). Political Economy and Colonial Ireland: The Propagation and Ideological Functions of Economic Discourse in the Nineteenth Century. Routledge. p. 194. ISBN 978-1-134-92039-6.
- Herbert Fry (1867). Our Schools and Colleges. Containing the principal particulars respecting endowed Grammar Schools, ... as also information respecting Colleges and Universities. First annual edition. R. Hardwicke. p. 29.
- Thomas Boylan; Tadhg Foley (8 August 2005). Political Economy and Colonial Ireland: The Propagation and Ideological Functions of Economic Discourse in the Nineteenth Century. Routledge. p. 215. ISBN 978-1-134-92039-6.
- Keith Tribe; Visiting Fellow Department of History University of Bristol Keith Tribe (11 September 2002). Economic Careers: Economics and Economists in Britain 1930-1970. Routledge. p. 87 note 2. ISBN 978-1-134-75590-5.
- Finola Kennedy (7 January 2011). Frank Duff: A Life Story. A&C Black. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-4411-0422-9.
- "Dermot McAleese's home page". Retrieved 30 March 2016.
- "philiplane.org". Retrieved 30 March 2016.
gollark: Yes, since if you try and talk about nuance or tradeoffs that's interpreted as "you do not agree and therefore must be part of the outgroup". Sometimes.
gollark: There are arguments both ways. On the one hand you're trying to make sure that the people you have match the population, but on the other you're going about hiring people based on factors other than how well they can do the job (though that was... probably going to happen anyway, considering), and people may worry that they got in only because of being some race/gender.
gollark: Also, more than that, political polarization generally.
gollark: Sadly, yes, first-past-the-post is awful that way.
gollark: Yes, I agree (except possibly not with the "you need to choose a side" bit); my point is that people often *do act as if* the other side is always wrong, regardless of whether they actually *are*.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.