Weapons of Math Destruction

Weapons of Math Destruction is a 2016 American book about the societal impact of algorithms, written by Cathy O'Neil. It explores how some big data algorithms are increasingly used in ways that reinforce preexisting inequality. It was longlisted for the 2016 National Book Award for Nonfiction,[1][2][3] and won the Euler Book Prize.

Weapons of Math Destruction
AuthorCathy O'Neil
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectMathematics, race, ethnicity
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherCrown Books
Publication date
2016
AwardsEuler Book Prize
ISBN0553418815

Overview

O'Neil, a mathematician, analyses how the use of big data and algorithms in a variety of fields, including insurance, advertising, education, and policing, can lead to decisions that harm the poor, reinforce racism, and amplify inequality. According to National Book Foundation:[1]

Most troubling, they reinforce discrimination: If a poor student can’t get a loan because a lending model deems him too risky (by virtue of his zip code), he’s then cut off from the kind of education that could pull him out of poverty, and a vicious spiral ensues. Models are propping up the lucky and punishing the downtrodden, creating a “toxic cocktail for democracy.”

She posits that these problematic mathematical tools share three key features: they are opaque, unregulated and difficult to contest, and at the same time scalable, thereby amplifying any inherent biases to affect increasingly larger populations.

Reception

The book received widespread praise for elucidating the consequences of reliance on big data models for structuring socioeconomic resources. Clay Shirky from The New York Times Book Review said "O’Neil does a masterly job explaining the pervasiveness and risks of the algorithms that regulate our lives," while pointing out that "the section on solutions is weaker than the illustration of the problem."[4]. Kirkus Reviews praised the book for being "an unusually lucid and readable" discussion of a technical subject.[5]

In 2019, the book won the Euler Book Prize of the Mathematical Association of America.[6]

gollark: Google open-source *some* random stuff, but the majority of their moneymaking stuff? NOPE.
gollark: They really have not.
gollark: They have not.
gollark: I doubt it.
gollark: Define "better" and "tech situation".

References

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.