Wag the Dog (novel)

American Hero is a 1993 satirical conspiracy novel, reissued as Wag the Dog: A Novel in 2004, written by Larry Beinhart. It speculates that Operation Desert Storm had been scripted and choreographed as a ploy to get George H.W. Bush reelected to a second term (taking cues from Margaret Thatcher's similar war in the Falkland Islands), while at the same time analyzing exactly why that conflict had been so popular. The book formed the inspiration and basis for the 1997 film, Wag the Dog.

Wag the Dog: A Novel
First edition
AuthorLarry Beinhart
Original titleAmerican Hero
Cover artistMaria Elias
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
GenreSatire, Conspiracy fiction
PublisherNation Books
Publication date
1993, 2004
Media typePrint (paperback)
Pages392
ISBN1-56025-663-X

Plot

On his death bed, Lee Atwater devises a plan to secure president George H. W. Bush's reelection by having a war professionally produced by Hollywood agent David Hartman. The plan is set in motion after Atwater's death, and Hartman hires movie director John Lincoln Beagle to produce the fake war. Beagle cancels other film projects to be able to prioritize the production of the war, among them one with movie star Magdalena Lazlo who hires private investigator Joe Broz to find out why her film was discontinued. Broz, who works for the Los Angeles branch of the large private security company Universal Security (U.Sec.), first moves in with Lazlo as her chauffeur/bodyguard to perform background investigation. When he discovers that Lazlo's house has been bugged by his employer U.Sec., the two stage a simulated love affair to confuse their observers. As part of this cover story, Broz pretends to have taken over as Lazlo's agent, a social ascent that gives him better access to the people that might be behind what the two assume to be a conspiracy against Lazlo. Meanwhile, Beagle has brainstormed for possible war scenarios and has decided to produce a remake of World War II dubbed "WWII--the video." The situation escalates when an aide to Beagle, an aspiring script writer, contacts Broz with a script for Lazlo and when U.Sec., assuming that the aide wants to leak details about Beagle's secret project, steps in and kills the writer. Lazlo and Broz, together with the latter's ex-Marine friends finally begin to understand the background situation better and manage to steal a memo from Beagle outlining the project. In return, U.Sec. kidnaps Lazlo and trades her for the memo. After a martial arts showdown, all parties agree to a truce, but at a film gig in Mexico, U.Sec. decides to act unilaterally, killing Lazlo and a stranger they mistake for Broz. The detective, heartbroken, then turns to drinking and eventually knocks at a fictional author's door to tell his story.

Notably, the final plot element is present only in some editions of the novel and is omitted from individual translations.

Reception

The novel has received only limited critical attention. It is featured in depth in a chapter in Stacy Olster's The Trash Phenomenon and in several academic publications by Sebastian M. Herrmann. Olster reads the novel in the context of postmodern cultural recycling and as commentary on a cultural shift away from text: For Beinhart, "images have now replaced words as repositories of history" (65) leading to a situation in which "changes of history can be achieved by changes in imagery" (66).[1] Herrmann lauds the novel's postmodern quality and its "diegetic and narrative games" and reads its central concern with the manipulation of political reality as indicative of an "epistemic panic" and, in consequence, as indicative of early forms of post-truth politics.[2] Reviews focused mostly on the plot and were mixed. In The New York Times, Caryn James called the book "surprisingly flat",[3] whereas Richard Eder in the Los Angeles Times praised it as a "funny, ingenious and outrageous political thriller".[4]

gollark: actually, it does.
gollark: You can just do *some* privacy-benefiting stuff but not go full something or other.
gollark: You could say it about lots of things. Dealing with dangerous dangers is sensible as long as the cost isn't more than, er, chance of bad thing times badness of bad thing.
gollark: Probably.
gollark: Oh, and, additionally (I thought of and/or remembered this now), knowing your actions are monitored is likely to change your behavior too, and make you less likely to do controversial things, which is not very good.

See also

References
  1. Olster, Stacey M. (2003). The Trash Phenomenon : contemporary literature, popular culture, and the making of the American century. Athens: University of Georgia Press. ISBN 082032521X. OCLC 50447968.
  2. Herrmann, Sebastian M. (2014). Presidential Unrealities: Epistemic Panic, Cultural Work, and the US Presidency. Heidelberg. ISBN 9783825363338. OCLC 882075518.
  3. James, Caryn (1998-02-06). "CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK; When the Headlines Follow the Script". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-12-27.
  4. Eder, Richard (1993-10-14). "BOOK REVIEW : A War Only Hollywood Could Produce? : AMERICAN HERO by Larry Beinhart , Pantheon, $23, 429 pages". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 2017-12-27.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.