Viscount Langford

Viscount Langford, of Longford Lodge, was a title in the Peerage of Ireland. It was created on 19 February 1766 for Elizabeth Rowley. She was made Baroness of Summerhill at the same time, also in the Peerage of Ireland. She was the wife of Hercules Langford Rowley, a member of the Irish Privy Council, grandson of Sir John Rowley and Mary, daughter of Sir Hercules Langford, 1st Baronet (see Langford baronets). She was succeeded by her son, the second Viscount. He represented County Antrim and Downpatrick in the Irish Parliament. The title became extinct in 1796 on the death of the second Viscount. The Rowley estates were inherited by Clotworthy Taylor, fourth son of Thomas Taylor, 1st Earl of Bective (whose eldest son was created Marquess of Headfort in 1800) by his wife Jane, daughter of Hercules Langford Rowley and the Viscountess Langford. He assumed by Royal licence the surname of Rowley in 1796 and in 1800 the Langford title was revived when he was raised to the Peerage of Ireland as Baron Langford. This title is still extant.

Viscounts Langford (1766)
Hercules Rowley, 2nd Viscount Langford (Robert Hunter)
  • Elizabeth Rowley, 1st Viscountess Langford (1713–1791). She was the daughter of Clotworthy Upton (MP in 1695 for the borough of Newton and in 1703 to his death; in June 1725 for the county of Antrim) and Jane Ormsby (daughter of John Ormsby MP of Limerick, born 1632 at Ballyvenogue, Limerick).
  • Hercules Rowley, 2nd Viscount Langford (1737–1796)
gollark: Maybe I should *also* be stripping Discorduous links also.
gollark: > /containment-SCP-125-7200-73950392338353323383533890635431966.png?width=362&height=362&height=421<|endoftext|>The SCP-3125 class is the place which is nowhere. I'm not sure how much is beyond its capacity.<|endoftext|>I guess that does not match the case.<|endoftext|>Yes, exactly.<|endoftext|>I mean, it's not anomalous.<|endoftext|>I can't say no.<|endoftext|>I wonder if there's any sort of sort of way to handle functions nicely, but I really don't have a nice library.<|endoftext|>Yes, like I said, I don't agree with the problem.<|endoftext|>I know of it, but I don't like it.<|endoftext|>And I don't know what you mean.<|endoftext|>Just don't use the advanced "journal" technology.<|endoftext|>I think that's just a word fragment.<|endoftext|>I think it's a general
gollark: The asterisk is in the wrong place.
gollark: I think the `<|endoftext|>` bit just a delimiter you can ignore.
gollark: > .<|endoftext|>I can't find the code.<|endoftext|>Yes, I'm working on a project, and I'll find it by my way.<|endoftext|>Hmm, that seems plausible.<|endoftext|>I just got a really good idea.<|endoftext|>Oh, I'll add that.<|endoftext|>And I have a bunch of ideas for *the* good reason, and I have some vague idea how to do some of this.<|endoftext|>I have a *unique* idea from the future, I think.<|endoftext|>I have *no idea what you mean.<|endoftext|>It can also be done with an extension to the ability.<|endoftext|>If they had a selfbots, you could just be able to pick and pick them, but it would be difficult to find that.<|endoftext|>That would be bad.<|endoftext|>I've managed to find some other way to find some sort of way to do programming languages. This is very boring.<|endoftext|>They're not a really complex language with some extra steps.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.