Vitarka-vicāra

In Buddhism, vitarka (Sanskrit वितर्क; Pali: vitakka; Tibetan phonetic: tokpa), "applied thought," "attention," and vicāra, (Sanskrit (विचार) and Pali; Tibetan phonetic: chöpa) "discernment," "sustained thinking," are qualities or elements of the first dhyāna.

For the hindu-term of vichara, see, see Vichara.
Vitarka mudrā, Tarim Basin, 9th century
Translations of
Vitarka
Englishconception
selectiveness
gross detection
examination
application of thought
applied thinking
initial application
Sanskritvitarka, वितर्क
Palivitakka
Chinese尋 (T) / 寻 (S)
Japanese尋
(rōmaji: jin)
Korean심
(RR: sim)
Tibetanརྟོག་པ།
(Wylie: rtog pa;
THL: tokpa)
Glossary of Buddhism
Translations of
Vicāra
Englishsustained application
sustained thinking
selectiveness
subtle discernment
discernment
Sanskritvicāra, विचार
Palivicāra
Chinese伺 (T) / 伺 (S)
Japanese伺
(rōmaji: shi)
Korean사
(RR: sa)
Tibetanདཔྱོད་པ།
(Wylie: dpyod pa;
THL: chöpa)
Glossary of Buddhism

In the Pali canon, Vitakka-vicāra form one expression, referring to "the normal process of discursive thought," which is suppressed by concentration in the second jhāna.[1][2] The Buddhist commentarial tradition, as represented by the contemporary Theravāda, interprets vitarka and vicāra as the initial and sustainted application of attention to a meditational object, which culminates in the stilling of the mind.

Etymology

Vitarka (Sanskrit: वितर्क ), "thoughts,"[3][4] "applied thought,"[5][4] "applied attention."[4] its roots are:

  • वि vi, a prefix to verbs and nouns it expresses;
  • तर्क tarka, "reasoning, inquiry."[6]

Vitarka may refer to mental activities that are manifest both in normal consciousness and in the first stage of dhyana.[4] In general, it means "thought," "applied thought," or "distracted thoughts."[4] According to Bhikkhu Bodhi, "In the Suttas, the word Vittaka is often used in the loose sense of thought, but in the Abhidhamma it is used in a precise technical sense to mean the mental factor that mounts or directs the mind towards an object."[3]

Vicāra (Sanskrit: विचार) means "thought" or "idea." Its roots are:

  • वि vi, a prefix to verbs and nouns it expresses;
  • चार् cār, to move, roam, obtain knowledge of.[7]

Vitarka investigates things roughly, while vicāra investigates things exactly.[8][9][10][11]

First dhyāna

Vitarka and vicāra are two of the qualities or elements of the first dhyāna (Pali: jhāna), which are absent in the higher jhanas.[12][13]

According to Roderick S. Bucknell, "vitakka-vicāra, the factor that particularly characterizes the first jhāna, is probably nothing other than the normal process of discursive thought, the familiar but usually unnoticed stream of mental imagery and verbalization."[12][note 1]

Martin Stuart-Fox explains, referring to Rhys Davids and Stede, when vitarka-vicāra are mentioned in tandem, they are one expression, "to cover all varieties of thinking, including sustained and focused thought. It is thinking in this inclusive sense that the meditator suppresses through concentration when he attains one-ness of mind and thus moves from first to second jhāna."[1]

Ulrich Timme Kragh explains vitarka (discernment) and vicāra (discursiveness), as understood by the Yogācārabhūmi-Śāstra, thus: Discernment is "the cognitive operation that is responsible for ascertaining what is perceived by the senses by initially labeling it with a name", while Discursiveness is "the subsequent conceptual operation of deciding whether the perceived sense-object is desirable and what course of action one might want to take in relation to it."[14]

According to Polak, in the Pali Canon vitarka and vicāra are mostly related to thinking about the sense-impressions, which give rise to further egoistical thought and action.[15] The stilling of this thinking fits into the Buddhist training of sense-withdrawal and right effort, culminating in the equanimity and mindfulness of dhyana-practice.[15][16]

According to Stuart-Fox, the Abhidhamma separated vitarka from vicāra, and ekaggatā (onepointedness) was added to the description first jhāna to give an equal number of five hindrances and five antidotes.[17] The commentarial tradition regards the qualities of the first jhāna to be antidotes to the five hindrances, and ekaggatā may have been added to the first jhāna to give exactly five anti-dotes for the five hindrances.[18][note 2]

While initially simply referring to thought, which in present at the onset of dhyāna, the terms vitarka and vicāra were re-interpreted by the developing Abhidharma and commentarial tradition. In Theravāda, vitarka is one of the mental factors (cetasika) that apprehend the quality of an object. It is the "initial application of attention"[4] or the mind to its object,[13] while vicāra is the sustained application of the mind on an object.[19] Vitarka is regarded in the Theravāda tradition as an antidote for thina-middha (sloth and torpor), one of the five hindrances.[3]

The Yogacara term manas means both "intentionality"[20] or 'self-centered thinking',[21] and "discriminative thinking" (vikalpa). The process of meditation aims at "non-thinking," stopping both these cognitive processes.[20]

Vitarka Mudrā

The Vitarka mudrā, "mudra of discussion," expresses vitarka, joining the tips of the thumb and the index together, and keeping the other fingers straight. This mudra has a great number of variants in Mahāyāna Buddhism, and is also known as Prajñāliṅganabhinaya and Vyākhyāna mudrā ("mudra of explanation").

gollark: And I could procedurally generate a moral system in a bunch of different ways.
gollark: Ignoring the whole fundamental values differences issue, saying something is objective(ly) right because it's generated by evolutionary processes and not humans is… odd. I mean, the bible has tons of contradictory competitors.
gollark: And I don't think you can have objective morality at all, is-ought problem and such.
gollark: No, negative utilitarianism bad.
gollark: ℚ you, utterly.

See also

Notes
  1. Bucknell refers to:
    * Martin Stuart-Fox, "Jhana and Buddhist Scholasticism," Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 12.2 (1989): 79-110
    * Paul Griffiths, "Buddhist Jhana: A form-critical study," Religion 13 (1983): 55-68.

    See also Bhante Sujato, Why vitakka doesn’t mean ‘thinking’ in jhana
  2. Stuart-Fox further notes that vitarka, being discursive thought, will do very little as an anti-dote for sloth and torpor, reflecting the inconsistencies which were introduced by the scholastics.[18]

References
  1. Fox 1989, p. 82.
  2. Bucknell 1993, p. 375-376.
  3. Bhikkhu Bodhi 2003, p. 56-57.
  4. Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 983.
  5. Visuddhimagga ( IV, 88)
  6. Sanskrit Dictionary for Spoken Sanskrit, tarka
  7. V.S.Apte. the Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Digital Dictionaries Of South Asia. p. 1422.
  8. Rhys-Davids & Stede 1921–25.
  9. Guenther & Kawamura 1975, p. Kindle Locations 1030-1033.
  10. Kunsang 2004, p. 30.
  11. Berzin 2006.
  12. Bucknell 1993.
  13. Keown 2004, p. 333.
  14. Ulrich Timme Kragh (editor), The Foundation for Yoga Practitioners: The Buddhist Yogācārabhūmi Treatise and Its Adaptation in India, East Asia, and Tibet, Volume 1 Harvard University, Department of South Asian studies, 2013, p. 72.
  15. Polak 2011.
  16. Arbel 2017.
  17. Fox 1989, p. 85-87.
  18. Fox 1989.
  19. Bodhi 2003, p. 56-57.
  20. Zhu 2005.
  21. Kalupahana 1992, p. 138-140.

Sources
  • Arbel, Keren (2017), Early Buddhist Meditation: The Four Jhanas as the Actualization of Insight, Routledge
  • Berzin, Alexander (2006), Primary Minds and the 51 Mental Factors
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (2003), A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma, Pariyatti Publishing
  • Bucknell, Roderick S. (1993), "Reinterpreting the Jhanas", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies: Volume 16, Number 2, Winter 1993
  • Buswell; Lopez (2013), The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, Princeton University Press
  • Guenther, Herbert V.; Kawamura, Leslie S. (1975), Mind in Buddhist Psychology: A Translation of Ye-shes rgyal-mtshan's "The Necklace of Clear Understanding" (Kindle ed.), Dharma Publishing
  • Kalupahana, David J. (1992), The Principles of Buddhist Psychology, Delhi: ri Satguru Publications
  • Kewon, Damien (2004), A Dictionary of Buddhism, Oxford University Press
  • Kunsang, Erik Pema (2004), Gateway to Knowledge, Vol. 1, North Atlantic Books
  • Polak, Grzegorz (2011), Reexamining Jhana: Towards a Critical Reconstruction of Early Buddhist Soteriology, UMCS
  • Rhys-Davids, T.W.; Stede, William, eds. (1921–25), The Pali Text Society’s Pali–English dictionary, Pali Text Society)

Mahāyāna tradition:

Theravāda tradition:

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.