Vertical exaggeration

Vertical exaggeration (VE) is a scale that is used in raised-relief maps, plans and technical drawings (cross section perspectives), in order to emphasize vertical features, which might be too small to identify relative to the horizontal scale.[1]

A vertically exaggerated mountain. In reality, the terrain would appear much flatter.

Scaling Factor

The vertical exaggeration is given by:

where VS is the vertical scale and HS is the horizontal scale, both given as representative fractions.

For example, if 1 centimetre (0.39 in) vertically represents 200 metres (660 ft) and 1 centimetre (0.39 in) horizontally represents 4,000 metres (13,000 ft), the vertical exaggeration, 20×, is given by:

.

Vertical exaggeration is given as a number; for example 5× means that vertical measurements are 5 times greater than horizontal measurements. The above example would be given as 20x. A value of 1× indicates that horizontal and vertical scales are identical, and is regarded as having "no vertical exaggeration." Vertical exaggerations less than 1 are not common, but would indicate a reduction in vertical scale (or, equivalently, a horizontal exaggeration).

In some cases, if the vertical exaggeration is too high, the map reader may get confused.

Criticism
A NASA projection of Maat Mons on Venus, with vertical exaggeration used to emphasize the mountain's height.

Some scientists[2] [3] object to vertical exaggeration as a tool that makes an oblique visualization dramatic at the cost of misleading the viewer about the true appearance of the landscape.

gollark: The most feasible way would probably be to deorbit the earth with MANY mass drivers.
gollark: https://qntm.org/destroy
gollark: Destroying the earth is quite hard.
gollark: Technically heavier stuff can fuse but it's energy negative.
gollark: Unless somewhere down the line someone else came up with some clever zero knowledge scheme so that you can obliterate all human rights knowers without actually being one yourself.

References
  1. Introduction to Topographic Maps – Vertical Exaggeration
  2. David Morrison, "“Flat‐Venus Society” organizes", EOS, Volume 73, Issue 9, American Geophysical Union, 3 March 1992, p. 99. https://doi.org/10.1029/91EO00076. Retrieved 11 March 2019.
  3. Robert Simmon, "Elegant Figures What Not To Do: Vertical Exaggeration," NASA Earth Observatory, November 5, 2010. Retrieved 11 March 2019.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.