VAGA

VAGA is an artists’ rights organization and copyright collective, representing over 6,000 visual artists worldwide.

VAGA
Founded1976 (1976)
Location
  • 111 Broadway, New York, NY 10006
ServicesLicensing, Artists' Advocacy
Members
Over 6,000
Key people
Robert Panzer, Executive Director
Websitearsny.com

Mission

Founded in 1976, it was the first fine art and photography royalty collecting society in the United States, and continues to be one of the largest.[1] Modeled after ASCAP (The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers), VAGA acts as a clearinghouse for licensing reproduction rights to publishers, museums, film production companies, auction houses, galleries, multinational corporations, and other users of art. In addition, VAGA protects its members from infringements, advises on all aspects of intellectual property law, and advocates for artists’ rights.[2][3] VAGA represents artists worldwide, both directly and through agreements with affiliated organizations in other countries. As a member of CISAC, the international confederation of societies that represent creators, VAGA takes part in establishing the international standards that govern the use of copyrighted works.[4]

Advocacy and Lobbying

VAGA works to improve artists’ rights through consultation with the U.S. Copyright Office and by lobbying Congress for improved rights legislation.[5]

VAGA, along with other rights organizations, in 2014 initiated the introduction of the American Royalties Too (ART) Act. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Jerrold Nadler and in the Senate by Senators Tammy Baldwin and Ed Markey.[6] If enacted, the bill will establish a resale royalty, whereby the creator of a work would receive a percentage of the sale of that work when it is resold at auction.[7]

In 2012, the U.S. Copyright Office reviewed the viability of a resale royalty law in the U.S. VAGA submitted public comments in support of such a law, and addressed the concerns of critics.[8] VAGA's Executive Director, Robert Panzer, also participated in roundtable discussions hosted by the U.S. Copyright Office in order to advocate for a resale royalty law.[9] The findings of the Office’s review were determinedly in favor of a resale royalty law in the US.[10]

gollark: That's an R720, fairly old by now.
gollark: I disagree entirely.
gollark: There is no namespacing, you have to do horrible hackery to make stuff only get included once, and it's less performant than an actual module system would be.
gollark: It does module-system-type things. It's just bad.
gollark: `#include`

References
  1. Daniel, Shawn (17 May 2012). "VAGA: Protecting the rights of artists since 1976". AEQAI. AEQAI.
  2. O'Donnell, Nicholas (18 October 2013). "Lauren Clay, the David Smith Estate, David Dodde, and Fair Use: Are We Learning Anything?". Art Law Report. Art Law Report.
  3. "Lehman Submits Statement for the Record for House Judiciary Hearing on Moral Rights, Termination Rights, Resale Royalty and Copyright Term". IIPI. International Intellectual Property Institute. 15 July 2014.
  4. "International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers". CISAC. Archived from the original on 2014-07-13. Retrieved 2014-10-03.
  5. Russeth, Andrew (2 November 2011). "VAGA Will Lobby for Federal Resale Royalties Bill". Observer. Observer.
  6. O'Donnell, Nicholas (24 March 2014). "Resale Royalties Redux: the "American Royalties Too Act"". Art Law Report. Art Law Report.
  7. "S.2045 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): American Royalties Too Act of 2014". congress.gov. Library of Congress. 26 February 2014.
  8. Panzer, Robert (19 September 2012). "Notice of Inquiry Concerning the Resale Royalty Right: Written Comments of VAGA" (PDF). copyright.gov. United States Copyright Office.
  9. "Resale Royalties: An Updated Analysis" (PDF). copyright.gov. United States Copyright Office. December 2013.
  10. Heddaya, Mostafa (13 December 2013). "Copyright Laws Are a-Changin' (Maybe) in the US and EU". Hyperallergic. Hyperallergic.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.