United States v. National Treasury Employees Union

United States v. National Treasury Employees Union, 513 U.S. 454 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Section 501(b) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
Argued November 8, 1994
Decided February 22, 1995
Full case nameUnited States, et al. v. National Treasury Employees Union, et al.
Citations513 U.S. 454 (more)
115 S. Ct. 1003; 130 L. Ed. 2d 964; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 1624
Holding
Section 501(b) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 violates the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityStevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concur/dissentO'Connor
DissentRehnquist, joined by Scalia, Thomas

Background

Congress amended the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 with the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (Pub.L. 101–194). In section 501(b), Congress prohibited its members, federal officers, and other government employees from "accepting an honorarium for making an appearance, speech, or writing an article."[1]

The National Treasury Employees Union challenged this section as an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment's freedom of speech protection.[1] The District Court held the honorarium ban unconstitutional and enjoined the government from enforcing it.[1] The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the District Court's holding.

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens authored the majority opinion. Citing the test put forward in Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, the Court found that the restriction put in place in Section 501(b) of the Act "constitutes a wholesale deterrent to a broad category of expression by a massive number of potential speakers" requiring an even greater burden than that put forward in Pickering.[2]

gollark: It's an example. There are other small-scale manufacturing things.
gollark: Apart from the minor cascading bee events, no.
gollark: > <meta charset="ISO-8859-1">This is wrong and will actually break with some of the round 3 entries.
gollark: Surprisingly, AGPLv3 doesn't contain any clauses about not hunting down families.
gollark: Broadly speaking, unless you somehow make consumption *negative* or never use nonrenewable things, you're still going to run through available stuff that way and have to do something.

References
  1. "United States v. National Treasury Employees Union". Retrieved 2016-05-21.
  2. "United States v. Treasury Employees". Retrieved 2016-05-21.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.