Unipotent

In mathematics, a unipotent element r of a ring R is one such that r  1 is a nilpotent element; in other words, (r  1)n is zero for some n.

In particular, a square matrix, M, is a unipotent matrix, if and only if its characteristic polynomial, P(t), is a power of t  1. Thus all the eigenvalues of a unipotent matrix are 1.

The term quasi-unipotent means that some power is unipotent, for example for a diagonalizable matrix with eigenvalues that are all roots of unity.

In a unipotent affine algebraic group, all elements are unipotent (see below for the definition of an element being unipotent in such a group).

Definition

Definition with matrices

Consider the group of upper-triangular matrices with on the diagonal, so they are the group of matrices[1]

then, a unipotent group can be defined as a subgroup of some . Using scheme theory the group can be defined as the group scheme

and an affine group scheme is unipotent if it is a closed group scheme of this scheme.

Definition with ring theory

An element, x, of an affine algebraic group is unipotent when its associated right translation operator, rx, on the affine coordinate ring A[G] of G is locally unipotent as an element of the ring of linear endomorphism of A[G]. (Locally unipotent means that its restriction to any finite-dimensional stable subspace of A[G] is unipotent in the usual ring sense.)

An affine algebraic group is called unipotent if all its elements are unipotent. Any unipotent algebraic group is isomorphic to a closed subgroup of the group of upper triangular matrices with diagonal entries 1, and conversely any such subgroup is unipotent. In particular any unipotent group is a nilpotent group, though the converse is not true (counterexample: the diagonal matrices of GLn(k)).

For example, the standard representation of on with standard basis has the fixed vector .

Definition with representation theory

If a unipotent group acts on an affine variety, all its orbits are closed, and if it acts linearly on a finite-dimensional vector space then it has a non-zero fixed vector. In fact, the latter property characterizes unipotent groups.[1] In particular, this implies there are no non-trivial semisimple representations.

Examples

Un

Of course, the group of matrices is unipotent. Using the Lower Central Series

where

and

there are associated unipotent groups. For example, on , the central series are the matrix groups

, , , and

given some induced examples of unipotent groups.

Gan

The additive group is a unipotent group group through the embedding

Notice the matrix multiplication gives

hence this is a group embedding. More generally, there is an embedding from the map

Using scheme theory, is given by the functor

where

Kernel of the Frobenius

Consider the functor on the subcategory , there is the subfunctor where

so it is given by the kernel of the Frobenius endomorphism.

Classification of unipotent groups over characteristic 0

Over characteristic there is a nice classification of unipotent algebraic groups with respect to nilpotent lie algebras. Recall that a nilpotent lie algebra is a subalgebra of some such that the iterated adjoint action eventually terminates to the zero-map. In terms of matrices, this means it is a subalgebra of , the matrices with for .

Then, there is an equivalence of categories of finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras and unipotent algebraic groups[1]page 261. This can be constructed using the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff series , where given a finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra, the map

gives a Unipotent algebraic group structure on .

In the other direction the exponential map takes any nilpotent square matrix to a unipotent matrix. Moreover, if U is a commutative unipotent group, the exponential map induces an isomorphism from the Lie algebra of U to U itself.

Remarks

Unipotent groups over an algebraically closed field of any given dimension can in principle be classified, but in practice the complexity of the classification increases very rapidly with the dimension, so people tend to give up somewhere around dimension 6.

Unipotent radical

The unipotent radical of an algebraic group G is the set of unipotent elements in the radical of G. It is a connected unipotent normal subgroup of G, and contains all other such subgroups. A group is called reductive if its unipotent radical is trivial. If G is reductive then its radical is a torus.

Decomposition of algebraic groups

Algebraic groups can be decomposed into unipotent groups, multiplicative groups, and abelian varieties, but the statement of how they decompose depends upon the characteristic of their base field.

Characteristic 0

Over characteristic there is a nice decomposition theorem of an algebraic group relating its structure to the structure of a linear algebraic group and an Abelian variety. There is a short exact sequence of groups[2]page 8

where is an abelian variety, is of multiplicative type, meaning, and is a unipotent group.

Characteristic p

When the characteristic of the base field is there is an analogous statement[2] for an algebraic group : there exists a smallest subgroup such that

  1. is a unipotent group
  2. is an extension of an abelian variety by a group of multiplicative type.
  3. is unique upto Commensurability in and is unique upto Isogeny.

Jordan decomposition

Any element g of a linear algebraic group over a perfect field can be written uniquely as the product g = gugs of commuting unipotent and semisimple elements gu and gs. In the case of the group GLn(C), this essentially says that any invertible complex matrix is conjugate to the product of a diagonal matrix and an upper triangular one, which is (more or less) the multiplicative version of the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition.

There is also a version of the Jordan decomposition for groups: any commutative linear algebraic group over a perfect field is the product of a unipotent group and a semisimple group.

gollark: You can't have an *omnipotent* god at least, because of the obvious paradox. A basically-omnipotent one is fine, though.
gollark: Not just "chemistry would be slightly different" or something.
gollark: To some extent, sure, but I think some of it is "if this physical constant was wrong stars wouldn't work" and such.
gollark: Complete omnipotence is logically incoherent anyway.
gollark: Ongoing memetics campaigns.

See also

References

  1. Milne. Linear Algebraic Groups (PDF). pp. 252–253, Unipotent algebraic groups.
  2. Brion, Michel (2016-09-27). "Commutative algebraic groups up to isogeny". arXiv:1602.00222 [math].
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.