Unfair prejudice in United States evidence law

Unfair prejudice in United States evidence law may be grounds for excluding relevant evidence.[1] "Unfair prejudice" as used in Rule 403 is not to be equated with testimony simply adverse to the opposing party. Virtually all evidence is prejudicial or it is not material. The prejudice must be "unfair".[2]

For the UK company law concept, see Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom company law.

Notes
  1. Federal Rules of Evidence 403
  2. Dollar v. Long Mfg., N.C. Inc., 561 F.2d 613, 618 (5th Cir. 1977)
gollark: Hmm. Apparently the UK just went into lockdown again despite Boris saying he really didn't want to, except they're still keeping schools because of course.
gollark: > <@!258639553357676545> How many egregious privacy violations does the app have?I haven't actually checked.
gollark: The UK rolled out a contact tracing app (very late) but I have no idea how much use it actually has.
gollark: The amazing power of exponential growth!
gollark: With basic clothy ones they apparently *mostly* just work to avoid infecting other people.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.