Triple system

In algebra, a triple system (or ternar) is a vector space V over a field F together with a F-trilinear map

The most important examples are Lie triple systems and Jordan triple systems. They were introduced by Nathan Jacobson in 1949 to study subspaces of associative algebras closed under triple commutators [[u, v], w] and triple anticommutators {u, {v, w}}. In particular, any Lie algebra defines a Lie triple system and any Jordan algebra defines a Jordan triple system. They are important in the theories of symmetric spaces, particularly Hermitian symmetric spaces and their generalizations (symmetric R-spaces and their noncompact duals).

Lie triple systems

A triple system is said to be a Lie triple system if the trilinear map, denoted , satisfies the following identities:

The first two identities abstract the skew symmetry and Jacobi identity for the triple commutator, while the third identity means that the linear map Lu,v: V  V, defined by Lu,v(w) = [u, v, w], is a derivation of the triple product. The identity also shows that the space k = span {Lu,v : u, vV} is closed under commutator bracket, hence a Lie algebra.

Writing m in place of V, it follows that

can be made into a -graded Lie algebra, the standard embedding of m, with bracket

The decomposition of g is clearly a symmetric decomposition for this Lie bracket, and hence if G is a connected Lie group with Lie algebra g and K is a subgroup with Lie algebra k, then G/K is a symmetric space.

Conversely, given a Lie algebra g with such a symmetric decomposition (i.e., it is the Lie algebra of a symmetric space), the triple bracket [[u, v], w] makes m into a Lie triple system.

Jordan triple systems

A triple system is said to be a Jordan triple system if the trilinear map, denoted {.,.,.}, satisfies the following identities:

The first identity abstracts the symmetry of the triple anticommutator, while the second identity means that if Lu,v:VV is defined by Lu,v(y) = {u, v, y} then

so that the space of linear maps span {Lu,v:u,vV} is closed under commutator bracket, and hence is a Lie algebra g0.

Any Jordan triple system is a Lie triple system with respect to the product

A Jordan triple system is said to be positive definite (resp. nondegenerate) if the bilinear form on V defined by the trace of Lu,v is positive definite (resp. nondegenerate). In either case, there is an identification of V with its dual space, and a corresponding involution on g0. They induce an involution of

which in the positive definite case is a Cartan involution. The corresponding symmetric space is a symmetric R-space. It has a noncompact dual given by replacing the Cartan involution by its composite with the involution equal to +1 on g0 and 1 on V and V*. A special case of this construction arises when g0 preserves a complex structure on V. In this case we obtain dual Hermitian symmetric spaces of compact and noncompact type (the latter being bounded symmetric domains).

Jordan pair

A Jordan pair is a generalization of a Jordan triple system involving two vector spaces V+ and V. The trilinear map is then replaced by a pair of trilinear maps

which are often viewed as quadratic maps V+ → Hom(V, V+) and V → Hom(V+, V). The other Jordan axiom (apart from symmetry) is likewise replaced by two axioms, one being

and the other being the analogue with + and subscripts exchanged.

As in the case of Jordan triple systems, one can define, for u in V and v in V+, a linear map

and similarly L. The Jordan axioms (apart from symmetry) may then be written

which imply that the images of L+ and L are closed under commutator brackets in End(V+) and End(V). Together they determine a linear map

whose image is a Lie subalgebra , and the Jordan identities become Jacobi identities for a graded Lie bracket on

so that conversely, if

is a graded Lie algebra, then the pair is a Jordan pair, with brackets

Jordan triple systems are Jordan pairs with V+ = V and equal trilinear maps. Another important case occurs when V+ and V are dual to one another, with dual trilinear maps determined by an element of

These arise in particular when above is semisimple, when the Killing form provides a duality between and .

gollark: What do I have to do with this?
gollark: It probably wouldn't actually do much to terrorists/child predators/whatever unless they continued to use them despite this, which would be stupid, but would compromise everyone else's security and increase government power substantially.
gollark: What seems to actually be desired is to mandate backdoors in all the popular end to end encrypted chat things, which *is* probably possible, but which would be very bad.
gollark: I entirely disagree with this, not least because cryptography is basically everywhere now so they can't stop people end-to-end-encrypting things themselves.
gollark: Generally it goes something along the lines of "end-to-end encryption bad, because we can't spy on it, which we totally need to do because something something terrorism children".

See also

References

  • Bertram, Wolfgang (2000), The geometry of Jordan and Lie structures, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1754, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-41426-1
  • Helgason, Sigurdur (2001), Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, American Mathematical Society (1st edition: Academic Press, New York, 1978).
  • Jacobson, Nathan (1949), "Lie and Jordan triple systems", American Journal of Mathematics, 71 (1): 149–170, doi:10.2307/2372102, JSTOR 2372102
  • Kamiya, Noriaki (2001) [1994], "Lie triple system", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press.
  • Kamiya, Noriaki (2001) [1994], "Jordan triple system", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press.
  • Koecher, M. (1969), An elementary approach to bounded symmetric domains, Lecture Notes, Rice University
  • Loos, Ottmar (1969), Symmetric spaces. Volume 1: General Theory, W. A. Benjamin
  • Loos, Ottmar (1969), Symmetric spaces. Volume 2: Compact Spaces and Classification, W. A. Benjamin
  • Loos, Ottmar (1971), "Jordan triple systems, R-spaces, and bounded symmetric domains", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 77: 558–561, doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1971-12753-2
  • Loos, Ottmar (1975), Jordan pairs, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 460, Springer-Verlag
  • Loos, Ottmar (1977), Bounded symmetric domains and Jordan pairs (PDF), Mathematical lectures, University of California, Irvine, archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03
  • Meyberg, K. (1972), Lectures on algebras and triple systems (PDF), University of Virginia
  • Rosenfeld, Boris (1997), Geometry of Lie groups, Mathematics and its Applications, 393, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 92, ISBN 978-0792343905, Zbl 0867.53002
  • Tevelev, E. (2002), "Moore-Penrose inverse, parabolic subgroups, and Jordan pairs", Journal of Lie Theory, 12: 461–481, arXiv:math/0101107, Bibcode:2001math......1107T
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.