Towarzysz pancerny

A Towarzysz pancerny (Polish: [tɔˈvaʐɨʂ panˈtsɛrnɨ], "armoured companion"; plural: towarzysze pancerni, or pancerni) was a medium-cavalryman in 16th to 18th century Poland, named after their chainmail armor ("pancerz"). These units were the second-most-important (and successful) cavalry in the Polish-Lithuanian army, after the hussars.

Towarzysz pancerny
Allegiance Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Typecavalry
RoleStanding professional military
Equipmentwar hammer, Mace (bludgeon), hatchet, sabre spear Lance

Most pancerni were recruited from the middle or lower classes of the Polish (or Lithuanian) nobility. They were organized into companies, with each company (Polish: chorągiew or rota) consisting of 60 to 200 horsemen.

Arms

They used chainmail or bechter armour to protect the upper body, karwasze sometimes with gauntlets, secretes (rarely Szyszak helmet), buckler shields, Polish sabre, reflex bow, gunpowder weapons, (such as flintlock pistols, arquebus or muskets, and early carabines). Earlier companies would sometimes be equipped with a horseman's pick, a short spear, or a lance. During the rule of king John III Sobieski, polearms became compulsory.

During the Middle Ages, under the rule of Mieszko I and Bolesław I the Brave, the name pancerni applied to the members of the duke's retinue. They were the wealthiest warriors in the Polish army, and as such they could afford to wear sophisticated armour, most commonly chainmail. Their weapons included arming swords, axes, spears, shields, strait bows, and nasal helmets.

Culture

In modern Polish, "pancerni" also means "tank men", as in the title of the book and TV series, Czterej pancerni i pies (Four Tank Men and a Dog). The word "pancerny" is seldom used in that context, however, with the common word being "czołgista" (from "czołg", "tank").

gollark: 510 new messages? Wow. What *happened*?
gollark: What are you referring to there? People knew the Earth was round for more than two millenia. Some Greek person even worked out its circumference with surprising accuracy in something like 200 BC.
gollark: <@669495592400977920> That really just sounds like pushing your particular weird religious-ish views, which I cannot agree with.
gollark: Er, what?
gollark: You probably can copyright DNA sequences, although probably not ones which come from some existing natural thing.

See also


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.