Ocular tonometry

Tonometry is the procedure eye care professionals perform to determine the intraocular pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye. It is an important test in the evaluation of patients at risk from glaucoma.[1] Most tonometers are calibrated to measure pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

"Tonometry" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Gastric tonometry.
Tonometry
A patient in front of a tonometer
Specialtyophthalmology
ICD-9-CM89.11
MeSHD014065
MedlinePlus003447

Methods
The slit lamp of a Goldmann tonometer
Semicircles seen during Goldmann tonometry through slit lamp

Applanation tonometry

In applanation tonometry the intraocular pressure (IOP) is inferred from the force required to flatten (applanate) a constant area of the cornea, for the Imbert-Fick law.[2] The Maklakoff tonometer was an early example of this method, while the Goldmann tonometer is the most widely used version in current practice.[3] Because the probe makes contact with the cornea, a topical anesthetic, such as proxymetacaine, is introduced on to the surface of the eye in the form of an eye drop.

Goldmann tonometry

Goldmann tonometry is considered to be the gold standard IOP test and is the most widely accepted method.[4][5] A special disinfected prism is mounted on the tonometer head and then placed against the cornea. The examiner then uses a cobalt blue filter to view two green semicircles. The force applied to the tonometer head is then adjusted using a dial connected to a variable tension spring until the inner edges of the green semicircles in the viewfinder meet. When an area of 3.06 mm (0.120 in) has been flattened, the opposing forces of corneal rigidity and the tear film are roughly approximate and cancel each other out allowing the pressure in the eye to be determined from the force applied. Like all non-invasive methods, it is inherently imprecise and may need to be adjusted.[6][7]

Perkins tonometer

The Perkins tonometer is a type of portable applanation tonometer, which may be useful in children, anesthetised patients who need to lie flat, or patients unable to co-operate with a sitting slit lamp examination, that yields clinical results comparable to the Goldmann.[8]

Dynamic contour tonometry
The PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer

Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) uses the principle of contour matching instead of applanation. The tip contains a hollow the same shape as the cornea with a miniature pressure sensor in its centre. In contrast to applanation tonometry it is designed to avoid deforming the cornea during measurement and is therefore thought to be less influenced by corneal thickness and other biomechanical properties of the cornea than other methods but because the tip shape is designed for the shape of a normal cornea, it is more influenced by corneal curvature.[9]

The probe is placed on the pre-corneal tear film on the central cornea (see gallery) and the integrated piezoresistive pressure sensor automatically begins to acquire data, measuring IOP 100 times per second. The tonometer tip rests on the cornea with a constant appositional force of one gram. When the sensor is subjected to a change in pressure, the electrical resistance is altered and the tonometer's computer calculates a change in pressure according to the change in resistance. A complete measurement cycle requires about eight seconds of contact time. The device also measures the variation in pressure that occurs with the cardiac cycle.[10][11][12]

Electronic indentation tonometry

Electronic indentation tonometers are modified Mackay-Marg tonometers that use a free floating transducer to detect the transmitted pressure. The transducer is surrounded by an outer ring that flattens the adjacent cornea reducing its influence on measurement. Because the device touches the cornea, topical anesthetic eye drops are used to numb the eye but as with non-contact tonometry, these devices are often used in children and non-cooperative patients because of their portability and ease of use. Portable electronic tonometers also play a major role in veterinary tonometry.

Rebound tonometry

Rebound tonometers determine intraocular pressure by bouncing a small plastic tipped metal probe against the cornea. The device uses an induction coil to magnetise the probe and fire it against the cornea. As the probe bounces against the cornea and back into the device, it creates an induction current from which the intraocular pressure is calculated. The device is simple and easy to use and self-use versions are available. It is portable, does not require the use of eye drops and is particularly suitable for children and non-cooperative patients.[13]

Pneumatonometry

A pneumatonometer utilizes a pneumatic sensor (consisting of a piston floating on an air bearing). Filtered air is pumped into the piston and travels through a small (5 mm (0.20 in) diameter) fenestrated membrane at one end. This membrane is placed against the cornea. The balance between the flow of air from the machine and the resistance to flow from the cornea affect the movement of the piston and this movement is used to calculate the intra-ocular pressure.

Impression tonometry
Schiøtz tonometer
Diaton transpalpebral tonometer

Impression tonometry (also known as indentation tonometry) measures the depth of corneal indentation made by a small plunger carrying a known weight. The higher the intraocular pressure, the harder it is to push against and indent the cornea. For very high levels of IOP, extra weights can be added to make the plunger push harder.[14] The movement of the plunger is measured using a calibrated scale.[14] The Schiøtz tonometer is the most common device to use this principle.

Non-corneal and transpalpebral tonometry

Transpalpebral tonometry refers to methods of measuring intraocular pressure through the eyelid. The Diaton non-corneal tonometer calculates pressure by measuring the response of a free-falling rod, as it rebounds against the tarsal plate of the eyelid through the sclera. The patient is positioned so that the tip of the device and lid are overlying sclera.[15] Non-corneal and transpalpebral tonometry does not involve contact with the cornea and does not require topical anesthetic during routine use. Transpalpebral tonometry may be useful for measuring postsurgery IOP after myopic LASIK ablation because this technique is not influenced by the treatment.[16] The Diaton tonometer still requires further evaluation and is not a substitute or alternative for more established methods.[17] The Diaton tonometer has a large margin of error compared with commonly used tonometers (e.g., GAT) in most patients (including those with ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and glaucoma tube shunts).[18]

Non-contact tonometry
Non-Contact-Tonometer Picker in 1974

Non-contact tonometry (or air-puff tonometry) is different from pneumatonometry and was invented by Bernard Grolman of Reichert, Inc (formerly American Optical). It uses a rapid air pulse to applanate (flatten) the cornea. Corneal applanation is detected via an electro-optical system. Intraocular pressure is estimated by detecting the force of the air jet at the instance of applanation.[19] Historically, non-contact tonometers were not considered to be an accurate way to measure IOP but instead a fast and simple way to screen for high IOP. However, modern non-contact tonometers have been shown to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry measurements and are particularly useful for measuring IOP in children and other non-compliant patient groups.

Ocular response analyzer

The ocular response analyser (ORA) is a non-contact (air puff) tonometer that does not require topical anaesthesia and provides additional information on the biomechanical properties of the cornea. It uses an air pulse to deform the cornea into a slight concavity. The difference between the pressures at which the cornea flattens inward and outward is measured by the machine and termed corneal hysteresis (CH). The machine uses this value to correct for the effects of the cornea on measurement.[20]

Palpation

Palpation (also known as digital tonometry) is the method of estimating intraocular pressure by gently pressing the index finger against the cornea of a closed eye. This method is notoriously unreliable.[21]

Influencing factors

Central corneal thickness (CCT)

The thickness of the cornea affects most non-invasive methods by varying resistance to the tonometer probe. A thick cornea gives rise to a greater probability of an IOP being overestimated (and a thin cornea of an IOP being underestimated), but the extent of measurement error in individual patients cannot be ascertained from the CCT alone.[22] The Ocular Response Analyzer and Pascal DCT Tonometers are less affected by CCT than the Goldmann tonometer. Conversely, non-contact and rebound tonometers are more affected.[22][23][24] Corneal thickness varies among individuals as well as with age and race. It is reduced in certain disease and following LASIK surgery.

  • A Goldmann tonometer
  • PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer
  • SensorTip of a PASCAL tonometer in contact with patient's cornea
gollark: Hey, actually, I could use a random cheap cloud server.
gollark: I also assumed Intel didn't sell stuff THAT low-clocked and with 4 cores at the time, but who knows.
gollark: Theirs is on a different distro and kernel? Also, the CPUs/boards/whatever are different.
gollark: Not particularly.
gollark: Well, 3.7GHz is the *max* clock of mine, I assume 2.1GHz is the minimum of theirs or it's actually really awful.

References
  1. Farandos, NM; Yetisen, AK; Monteiro, MJ; Lowe, CR; Yun, SH (2014). "Contact Lens Sensors in Ocular Diagnostics". Advanced Healthcare Materials. 4 (6): 792–810. doi:10.1002/adhm.201400504. PMID 25400274.
  2. Goldman, H; Schmidt, TH (1957). "Uber Applanations-tonometrie". Ophthalmologica. 134 (4): 221–242. doi:10.1159/000303213. PMID 13484216.
  3. Okafor KC, Brandt JD (Mar 2015). "Measuring intraocular pressure". Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 26 (2): 103–9. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000129. PMID 25594767.
  4. Amm M, Hedderich J (Jan 2005). "[Transpalpebral tonometry with a digital tonometer in healthy eyes and after penetrating keratoplasty.]". Ophthalmologe. 102 (1): 70–6. doi:10.1007/s00347-004-1082-5. PMID 15322801.
  5. Schlote, T; Landenberger, H (Feb 2005). "[Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01'PRA' in glaucoma patients]". Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 222 (2): 123–31. doi:10.1055/s-2005-857881. PMID 15719316.
  6. Groves, N (15 September 2006). "Should IOP be adjusted for corneal thickness alone?". Ophthalmology Times. Archived from the original on 30 October 2006. Retrieved 29 December 2006.
  7. Chihara, E. (May–Jun 2008). "Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data". Surv Ophthalmol. 53 (3): 203–18. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.02.005. PMID 18501267.
  8. Arora, R; Bellamy, H; Austin, M. (March 2014). "Applanation tonometry: a comparison of the Perkins handheld and Goldmann slit lamp-mounted methods". Clin. Ophthalmol. 26 (8): 605–610. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S53544. PMC 3971938. PMID 24707165.
  9. Francis, BA; Hsieh, A; Lai, MY; Chopra, V; Pena, F; Azen, S; Varma; R (Jan 2007). "Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry". Ophthalmology. 114 (1): 20–6. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.047. PMID 17070592.
  10. Kaufmann, C; Bachmann, LM; Thiel, M (2004). "Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45 (9): 3118–3121. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0018. PMID 15326129.
  11. Kaufmann, C; Bachmann, LM; Thiel, MA (2003). "Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44 (9): 3790–3794. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0946. PMID 12939293.
  12. Kniestedt, C; Nee, M; Stamper, RL (2004). "Dynamic Contour Tonometry. A Comparative Study on Human Cadaver Eyes". Arch Ophthalmol. 122 (9): 1287–1293. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.9.1287. PMID 15364707.
  13. Schreiber, W; Vorwerk, CK; Langenbucher, A; Behrens-Baumann, W; Viestenz, A. (April 2007). "A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry". Ophthalmologe. 104 (4): 299–304. doi:10.1007/s00347-007-1487-z. PMID 17333073.
  14. Hofstetter, Cline D; Griffin Jr., HW (1997). Dictionary of Visual Science (4th ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-7506-9895-5.
  15. Dr. Shaun Maria Dacosta, Dr. Babu Rajendran, Dr. Janakiraman P. "Comparison of Diaton Tonometry and Non Contact Tonometry in Indian Subjects" AIOC PROCEEDINGS 2008 Dec; 260
  16. Cacho, I; Sanchez-Naves, J; Batres, L; Pintor, J; Carracedo, G (2015). "Comparison of Intraocular Pressure before and after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Refractive Surgery Measured with Perkins Tonometry, Noncontact Tonometry, and Transpalpebral Tonometry". J Ophthalmol. 2015: 683895. doi:10.1155/2015/683895. PMC 4475733. PMID 26167293.
  17. Li, Y; Shi, J; Duan, X; Fan, F (December 2010). "Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry". Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 248 (12): 1765–70. doi:10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y. PMID 20495818.
  18. Kwon, YH (4 March 2016). "The Utility of Diaton Tonometer Measurements in Patients With Ocular Hypertension, Glaucoma, and Glaucoma Tube Shunts: A Preliminary Study for its Potential Use in Keratoprosthesis Patients". J Glaucoma. 25 (8): 643–7. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000394. PMID 26950582.
  19. http://www.mercksource.com Archived May 9, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  20. Medeiros, Felipe A.; Weinreb, Robert N. (October 2006). "Evaluation of the Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using the Ocular Response Analyzer". J Glaucoma. 15 (5).
  21. Troost, A; Yun, SH; Specht, K; Krummenauer, F; Schwenn, O (Mar 2005). "Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers". Br J Ophthalmol. 89 (3): 280–3. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.050211. PMC 1772547. PMID 15722303.
  22. Robert N. Weinreb, James D. Brandt, David Garway-Heath and Felipe A. Medeiros 2007 "4th Consensus Meeting:Intra-Ocular Pressure" Archived 2011-06-10 at the Wayback Machine
  23. Boehm, AG; Weber, A; Pillunat, LE; Koch, R (June 2008). "Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Comparison to Intracameral IOP Measurements". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49 (6): 2472–7. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1366. PMID 18316699.
  24. Kirstein E, An Update on Methods for Assessing Intraocular Pressure. online CE, 2006
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.