Theorem on formal functions

In algebraic geometry, the theorem on formal functions states the following:[1]

Let be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf on X. Let be a closed subscheme of S defined by and formal completions with respect to and . Then for each the canonical (continuous) map:
is an isomorphism of (topological) -modules, where
  • The left term is .
  • The canonical map is one obtained by passage to limit.

The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: Stein factorization and a version of Zariski's main theorem that says that a proper birational morphism into a normal variety is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are:

Corollary:[2] For any , topologically,

where the completion on the left is with respect to .

Corollary:[3] Let r be such that for all . Then

Corollay:[4] For each , there exists an open neighborhood U of s such that

Corollary:[5] If , then is connected for all .

The theorem also leads to the Grothendieck existence theorem, which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.)

Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf. Illusie. According to Illusie (pg. 204), the proof given in EGA III is due to Serre. The original proof (due to Grothendieck) was never published.

The construction of the canonical map

Let the setting be as in the lede. In the proof one uses the following alternative definition of the canonical map.

Let be the canonical maps. Then we have the base change map of -modules

.

where is induced by . Since is coherent, we can identify with . Since is also coherent (as f is proper), doing the same identification, the above reads:

.

Using where and , one also obtains (after passing to limit):

where are as before. One can verify that the composition of the two maps is the same map in the lede. (cf. EGA III-1, section 4)

Notes

  1. EGA III-1, 4.1.5
  2. EGA III-1, 4.2.1
  3. Hartshorne, Ch. III. Corollary 11.2
  4. The same argument as in the preceding corollary
  5. Hartshorne, Ch. III. Corollary 11.3
gollark: In this GPU market?
gollark: ... and forgot to copypaste it somehow. https://nitter.net/PatrickMcGee_/status/1451619916994396164
gollark: I managed to dredge up relevant information from my browser history.
gollark: No, I mean they run the biggest ad exchange thing, and do some tricks to make competitors to them in any of the area unviable.
gollark: It could probably be one of those prisoner's dilemma situations. More so than regular advertising.

References

  • Luc Illusie, Topics in Algebraic Geometry
  • Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1961). "Eléments de géométrie algébrique: III. Étude cohomologique des faisceaux cohérents, Première partie". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. 11. doi:10.1007/bf02684274. MR 0217085.
  • Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.