The Three University Missions Ranking

The Three University Missions Moscow International University Ranking (shortly known as the Moscow Ranking) is a global ranking of academic universities developed by the Russian Association of Rating Makers, with the participation of the international association IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence. The ranking evaluates the quality of education, scientific work, and also, for the first time in the compilation of global academic rankings, it consistently evaluates the universities' contribution to society. The ranking has been published annually since 2017.

The Three University Missions Ranking
EditorDmitry Grishankov
CategoriesHigher education
FrequencyAnnual
PublisherAssociation of Rating Makers
First issue2017
CountryRussia
LanguageEnglish, Russian
Websitewww.mosiur.org

History

Plans were first announced in 2016 for the development of a new international ranking that would evaluate not only the quality of education and research, but also the level of international cooperation, and the contribution to sustainable development and distance education.[1] The operator of the ranking, the non-profit Association of Rating Makers, was established by the International Group RAEX and leading Russian rating agencies and ranking compilers.[2]

The pilot version of the ranking was published in December 2017.[3] It included 200 universities from 39 countries.[4]

The second issue of the ranking, published in November 2018, included 333 universities from 53 countries. The short list of the third issue, which the compilers plan to complete in summer 2019, includes more than 1,500 universities.[5]

Methodology

Development of methodology

The methodology of the ranking system was developedin collaboration with more than 100 organizations – universities, councils of rectors, rating agencies, and expert associations, notably the IREG Observatory on Academic Rankings and Excellence and the Russian Union of Rectors.[6] The Expert Council of the ranking comprises experts in the field of higher education from the Belgium,Brazil, China, India, Iran, Italy, Poland, South Africa, Turkey, USA, UK, and Russia.[7]

Criteria

According to the current version of the methodology, the ranking uses 17 criteria divided into three groups: “Education,” “Research”, and “University and Society.” The total weight of criteria per group is: Education – 45%, Science – 25%, University and Society – 30%.

Education group criteria

Number of winners from the university in international student olympiads in individual and team competitions Percentage of international students Ratio of the university budget to the number of students Ratio of students to the number of researchers and teaching staff

Science group criteria

Number of awards on the IREG Observatory List won by researchers and teaching staff and by university graduates Field-Weighted Citation Impact (global level), according to Scopus Normalised Citation Impact (global level), according to Web of Science Field-Weighted Citation Impact (national level), according to Scopus Normalised Citation Impact (national level), according to Web of Science Ratio of income from research to the number of researchers and teaching staff Field-Weighted Views Impact of scientific publications (FWVI, according to Scopus)

University and Society group criteria

Number of courses offered by the universities on the largest global platforms of massive open online courses Share of the university's academic papers in the total publications of the country's universities Total number of university web pages indexed by leading search engines Number of views of the university's Wikipedia page Number of subscribers to the university's Twitter account Number of university graduates with an individual Wikipedia page

International audit

In May 2018, the ranking received a report on its audit by PwC.[8] The “Three University Missions” ranking thus became the second global academic ranking, after Times Higher Education, that passed this procedure.[9]

Rankings

The 2017 pilot ranking comprised 200 universities from 39 countries, including 13 Russian universities. The most widely represented nations in the ranking were universities in the United States, the UK, and China, with 41, 18, and 14 universities in the top 200, respectively.[10]

The 2018 ranking includes 333 universities from 53 countries, including 17 Russian universities. In the top 333 of the second issue of the ranking, 61 universities from the USA are represented, followed by the UK (29 universities) and Germany (25 universities).[11]

The compilers of the 2019 ranking extended the short list of universities under review to 1,640 and announced plans to finish work on the next issue of the ranking by summer 2019.[12]

Reaction

The ranking attracted the interest of a number of representatives of the rating community and researchers, who particularly noted the innovativeness of the ranking in terms of its assessment of the interaction between universities and society.

According to the president of the Perspektywy education foundation, Waldemar Siwinski, the ranking "goes beyond traditional ranking criteria, adding some new, more socially oriented elements".[13]

In an interview with the Brazilian publication Folha de S. Paulo, the president of the international association IREG Observatory on Academic Rankings and Excellence, Luiz Claudio Costa, noted that “the new Moscow International University Ranking represents the second generation of academic rankings and <...> poses correct and important questions by its search for indicators to evaluate the quality of teaching and the interaction of the university with society”.[14]

The president of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA, USA), Judith Eaton, called the release of the ranking timely, in view of the growing recognition that the social role of a university is one of its key functions. She views the ranking as an attempt to move away from the elitist approach of evaluating universities, instead paying special attention to the social responsibility of higher education.[15]

An expert on academic rankings from the University of Groningen (The Netherlands), Jules van Rooij, criticized the ranking, noting that, despite a number of "good ideas," "[the compilers] of the ranking measure only what they want to measure" and "quality can't be assessed with simple linear lists".[16]

Jack Grove, columnist for World University Rankings, was also skeptical about the ranking, noting that the exceptional achievements of Russian universities in the ranking had Russian roots.[17]

The ranking was discussed in a number of academic studies[18][19][20][21] along with the leading global university rankings – Times Higher Education, QS, ARWU, etc. An article by Ivančević & Luković (2018) points out that the Moscow International University Ranking is the only global academic ranking considered in their study that covers all “performance dimensions.” Zadorozhnyuk et al. (2018) noted the innovative use of the “University and Society” group criteria in the ranking. In addition to “The Three University Missions” ranking, the assessment of the university's contribution to society is also used by the Washington Monthly College Rankings and THE Impact Rankings.[22]

gollark: I cannot.
gollark: ++tel status
gollark: Hmm.
gollark: ++tel hangup
gollark: They are VERY ubiqutious.

References
  1. "New Ranking from Russia - IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence". ireg-observatory.org. November 6, 2016.
  2. "Ассоциация составителей рейтингов :: Проекты ассоциации".
  3. "Moscow International Ranking "The Three University Missions" released - IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence". www.ireg-observatory.org. December 11, 2017.
  4. "First Moscow International University Ranking The Three University Missions Released – Moscow International University Ranking News". December 11, 2017.
  5. "Russian Three Missions Ranking Published - IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence". ireg-observatory.org. December 2, 2018.
  6. "Moscow International University Ranking Methodology".
  7. "Seminar on Moscow international "Three University Missions" ranking - IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence". ireg-observatory.org. June 9, 2017.
  8. "The Three University Missions Ranking passes independent audit – Moscow International University Ranking News". June 5, 2018.
  9. "THE World University Rankings 2016-2017 passes independent audit". Times Higher Education (THE). May 9, 2016.
  10. "Ranking 2017 – Moscow International University Ranking".
  11. "Ranking 2018 – Moscow International University Ranking".
  12. "MosIUR 2019: New Shortlist Features over 1500 Universities – Moscow International University Ranking News". February 7, 2019.
  13. "What direction next for university rankings?". University World News. November 18, 2016.
  14. "Brasileiro assume grupo ligado à Unesco que trata de rankings universitários". June 28, 2018.
  15. "Moscow Third University Mission Conference - IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence". ireg-observatory.org. December 1, 2018.
  16. "RUG drops in THE ranking". September 6, 2017.
  17. "Russian universities excel in Kremlin-backed rankings". Times Higher Education (THE). December 23, 2017.
  18. Ivančević, V., &Luković, I. (2018). National university rankings based on open data: A case study from Serbia. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1516-1525.
  19. Гайсёнак, В. А., Наумовіч, В. А., Самахвал, В. В., & Галынскі, У. М. (2018). Установы вышэйшай адукацыі Беларусі ў сусветных навукова-адукацыйных рэйтынгах: вынікі 2018 года.
  20. Гайсенок, В. А., Наумович, О. А., & Самохвал, В. В. (2018). Корреляционные связи позиций вузов в международных рейтингах. Высшее образование в России, (12).
  21. Задорожнюк Иван Евдокимович, Калашник Вячеслав Михайлович, Киреев Сергей Васильевич (2018). Московский международный рейтинг вузов в глобальном образовательном пространстве. Высшее образование в России, (6), 31-40.
  22. Usher, Alex (April 2, 2019). A New Set of International Rankings.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.