The Regulatory Review

The Regulatory Review is an online, daily publication devoted to coverage of regulatory news, analysis, and commentary. It is produced under the auspices of the Penn Program on Regulation and operated by students at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. The Regulatory Review's content includes essays produced by the publication's staff members as well as regular contributions from scholars, public officials, attorneys, and others interested in regulatory developments.[1]

The Regulatory Review
Available inEnglish
OwnerPenn Program on Regulation, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Created byCary Coglianese
EditorSimone Hussussian
URLwww.theregreview.org
CommercialNo
LaunchedDecember 24, 2009 (2009-12-24)

History

The Regulatory Review dates to 2009, when it was originally known as RegBlog. At that time, University of Pennsylvania Law School Professor Cary Coglianese placed a blogging component on the website of the Penn Program on Regulation (PPR).[2] Coglianese named the blog "RegBlog"—a name intended to convey the blog's purpose as a platform devoted to coverage of regulation. The blog's content initially comprised occasional short posts about regulatory news items and other related developments.

Content was added to the site on an intermittent basis, until then-Penn Law student Jonathan Mincer presented a plan to create a student-run infrastructure based around the regular production of content. After that student-run organization became active, a new website was constructed for RegBlog that no longer relied on the stock blog functionality that had been built into the initial PPR website. RegBlog's new site was launched in April 2011, which marked the beginning of RegBlog as a publication in a form similar to what The Regulatory Review is today, featuring new content every weekday of the year.[3]

A subsequent redesign of the RegBlog website was carried out in November 2013, an undertaking that involved placing RegBlog onto a new platform and giving it the graphical look that it retained until another redesign in March 2017.[4]

This most recent redesign was part of a larger initiative by the members of RegBlog's 2016–2017 Editorial Board under the leadership of former editor-in-chief Kim Kirschenbaum. This initiative also included changing the publication's name in March 2017 from RegBlog to The Regulatory Review.[5]

Content

The Regulatory Review features coverage on regulatory topics, including administrative law, environmental regulation, financial regulation, health care, network neutrality, occupational safety and health, regulatory politics, telecommunications, and transportation, among other issues.[6][7] It also features long-form essays written by contributors who occupy positions in government, academia, the nonprofit sector, and the private sector. In addition to publishing essays contributed by regulatory experts, The Regulatory Review features content authored by student staff members.[8]

The Regulatory Review also periodically publishes "series," collections of essays organized around common themes or topics.[9] Examples of such recent series include "Regulating Police Use of Force,"[10] "Artificial Intelligence and the Administrative State,"[11] "A Debate over the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis,"[12] "U.S. Election 2016,"[13] and "Rooting Out Regulatory Capture." [14]

Recent leadership
Year Board Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor
2019 9th Simone Hussussian Marissa Fritz
2018 8th Sarah Madigan Nicholas Bellos
2017 7th Charlie Rosenthal Bryan C. Williamson
2016 6th Kim Kirschenbaum Eric Schlabs
2015 5th Alexandra Hamilton Kate Sell
2014 4th Jessica Bassett Brandon Kenney

Natalie Punchak

2013 3rd James Hobbs Lauren-Kelly Devine
2012 2nd Sean Moloney Brian Ryoo
2011 1st Jonathan Mincer Sean Moloney

Professor Coglianese is the publication's faculty advisor.[4]

Notable contributors
gollark: What if we try generating random programs in *your* language?
gollark: I wonder how to do this *efficiently*...
gollark: Ah...
gollark: It should be okay with regexes or something non-turing-complete.
gollark: Hold on, I can probably make a much nicer one.

References
  1. "About Us". The Regulatory Review.
  2. "Penn Program on Regulation". Penn Program on Regulation. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  3. Mincer, Jonathan (2016-5-5). "The Student Side of RegBlog". The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  4. Coglianese, Cary and Hobbs, James (2013-11-11). "RegBlog’s Next Chapter". The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  5. Kirschenbaum, Kim (2017-3-3). "From RegBlog to The Regulatory Review". The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  6. "Topics Archived 2017-02-07 at the Wayback Machine". The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  7. "Submissions". The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  8. "The Regulatory Review on Masur and Posner's " Should Regulation Be Countercyclical?" | University of Chicago Law School". www.law.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2017-07-24.
  9. "Series". The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  10. "Regulating Police Use of Force" (2017-2-12). The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  11. "Artificial Intelligence and the Administrative State" (2016-12-19). The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  12. "A Debate over the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis" (2016-9-26). The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  13. "U.S. Election 2016" (2016-7-25). The Regulatory Review. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  14. Bull, Reeves. "Repost from RegBlog. Combatting External and Internal Regulatory Capture". Osservatorio AIR.
  15. Hamberger, Edward (July 10, 2017). "Constructively Improving Railroad Regulations". The Regulatory Review.
  16. Hatch, Orrin. "The Role of Federal Judges in the Modern Administrative State". Orrin Hatch United States Senator for Utah.
  17. Rakoff, Jed. "Prosecuting Corporate Criminals". ProMarket.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.