The Archko Volume

The Archko Volume or Archko Library [1] is a 19th-century volume containing what purports to be a series of reports from Jewish and pagan sources contemporary with Jesus that relate to the biblical texts describing his life. The work went through a number of versions and has remained in print ever since. The texts are otherwise unknown, and the author was convicted by an ecclesiastical court of falsehood and plagiarism.[2]

The Archko Volume is regarded as fraudulent by all religious scholars. The medievalist scholar M.R. James described the work as a "ridiculous and disgusting American book."[3]

History of publication

In 1879, the Rev. William Dennes Mahan, a Cumberland Presbyterian minister of Boonville, Missouri, published a pamphlet of thirty-two pages entitled A Correct Transcript of Pilate's Court. It purported to be an official report of the trial and death of Jesus made directly to the Roman Emperor Tiberius by Pilate as governor of Judaea. Mahan claimed the text was supplied to him in 1856 by a German scholar, Henry C. Whydaman, from Father Peter Freelinhusen, "the chief guardian of the Vatican," who sent the Latin text to Whydaman’s brother-in-law, C.C. Vantberger of New York, for English translation.[4] Whydaman, Freelinhusen, and Vantberger are otherwise unknown, and the documentation of the exchange contains inconsistencies and errors, including Freelinhusen’s request for a fee payable in "darics" (ancient Persian coins).[5]

This work was subsequently shown to have been copied almost verbatim from "Ponce Pilate à Vienne," a short story by Joseph Méry published in Revue de Paris in 1837. Méry said he had been inspired by an old Latin manuscript, and an 1842 English translation of the story made the claim that it was in fact taken from an old Latin manuscript. Mahan’s contribution was evidently to create correspondence showing him to be the discoverer of the manuscript.[6]

Contents

In 1884 Mahan published the first version of the Archko Volume, entitled The Archaeological Writings of the Sanhedrin and Talmuds of the Jews, Taken from the Ancient Parchments and Scrolls at Constantinople and the Vatican at Rome, Being the Record Made by the Enemies of Jesus of Nazareth in His Day: The Most Interesting History Ever Read by Man. This included an expanded version of "Pilate's Court" plus a series of other texts that he claimed to have obtained himself in a visit to Rome and Constantinople and translated with the aid of Dr. M. McIntosh of Scotland and Dr. Twyman of England, also otherwise unheard of.[7] These texts include interviews with the shepherds, Gamaliel's interview with Joseph and Mary, Caiaphas's reports to the Sanhedrin, "Eli's story of the Magi", Herod Antipater's defense before the Roman Senate for the Massacre of the Innocents, and Herod Antipas's defense before the Senate—all with the claim that they were copied from ancient manuscripts and translated into English.[8]

The texts are otherwise unknown to scholarship, and the volume contains various inconsistencies. It quotes an unknown Greek philosopher, "Meeleesen," and includes references to Josephus that do not exist. It mistakenly asserts that Philo spoke often of Jesus and that "the scribes of those days were most all Rabbis." There are inaccurate descriptions of the library of the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, the making of papyrus, and an inaccurate chronology for both Philo and Tacitus. Contemporaries raised the question of whether Mahan could have possibly made the trip to Rome and Constantinople in less than two months. Most tellingly, large portions of "Eli's Story of the Magi" were copied verbatim from the 1880 novel Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ. At one point, a strange word reveals that a single line of the printed text of Ben-Hur has accidentally been omitted during copying.[9]

Legacy

Mahan was summoned before church authorities in September 1885 on charges of falsehood and plagiarism. Lew Wallace, American minister to Turkey (and, incidentally, the author of Ben Hur) testified that there was no record of Mahan’s visit to Turkey or to the library of the Hagia Sophia, and that the primary sources he cited were unknown.[10] Mahan was convicted and suspended from the ministry for one year. He promised to withdraw the book from publication.[11] But the book was reprinted many times from 1887 onward by various publishers, since U.S. copyright laws were lax during this period. The title Archko Volume appeared during this period, as did the note "Second edition". This second edition omits "Eli and the Story of the Magi" and also creates a preface using material from the introductions to the texts. No new original material is included, which suggests that this version was produced by a publisher's clerk. The omission of the Eli text suggests that the court verdict was known to the reviser.[12] As of 2016, modern reprints of the book were still being offered for sale on Amazon.com and other sites.

The circumstances of composition, the letters to the Boonville Advertiser, and the proceedings of the church court were all investigated by Edgar J. Goodspeed and published in his books Strange New Gospels (1931) and Modern Apocrypha (1956); more recently Per Beskow (1983) has identified Mahan's original sources and reported on subsequent editions of the Archko Volume.

gollark: Well, the problem is that ABR is involved in the future prediction. So changes to it make the future prediction code do more work.
gollark: What PR?
gollark: Is that even Macron?
gollark: Fail.
gollark: Macron should have a compiler option to enable commutativity.

References
  1. E.J. Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931), 58
  2. E.J. Goodspeed, Modern Apocrypha (Boston: Beacon Press, 1956), 40.
  3. Anderson, Richard (1974). "The Fraudulent Archko Volume". Brigham Young University Studies. 15 (1): 43–64. JSTOR 43040538.
  4. Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels, 42; Modern Apocrypha, 1956, 29–31.
  5. Goodspeed, Modern Apocrypha, 31–32.
  6. Per Beskow, Strange Tales about Jesus (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983) 53–54: "As Goodspeed has shown, Mahan unabashedly plagiarized an existing story, and I am happy to have identified the original author: it was the French dramatician Joseph Mery (1798–1867), who wrote a number of short stories in his youth. The original story, Ponce Pilate à Vienne, was published in the Revue de Paris in 1837; a comparison with Mahan's "manuscript" reveals a literal agreement in every detail, except where the text has been distorted by mistranslations or misreadings."
  7. Goodspeed, Modern Apocrypha, 33.
  8. Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels, 1931, 49–50; Archko Volume, 13.
  9. Goodspeed, Modern Apocrypha, 35–37.
  10. Goodspeed, Modern Apocrypha, 39.
  11. Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels, 54–56
  12. Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels, 1931, 57–58.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.