Takeo Yamaguchi

Takeo Yamaguchi (山口長男, Yamaguchi Takeo, born November 23, 1902 in Seoul, Korea, died April 23, 1983 in Tokyo, Japan) was an avant-garde Japanese painter of monochrome Art Informel works.

Takeo Yamaguchi in 1964

About

Yamaguchi studied Western painting at the Tokyo Art School. Upon graduation in 1927, he moved to Paris to study European painting. He developed his mature style during the mid-1950s, with a focus on flatness.[1]

Yamaguchi's Yellow Eyes, painted in 1959, sold for US$948,500 at Sotheby's Contemporary Art Evening Sale in New York on May 18, 2017,[2] which set a record for the highest price paid for the artist's work.

Exhibitions

Group exhibitions

  • 1955 - São Paulo Biennial[1]
  • 1956 - Venice Biennale: Japan Pavilion
  • 1958 - Guggenheim Museum: Guggenheim International Award exhibition,
  • 1963 - São Paulo Biennial
  • 1964 - Museum of Modern Art, New York: The New Japanese Painting and Sculpture

Solo exhibitions

  • 1961 - Minami Gallery, Tokyo[1]
  • 1963 - Nihonbashi Gallery, New York
  • 1965 - Minami Gallery, Tokyo
  • 1968 - Minami Gallery, Tokyo
  • 1972 - Minami Gallery, Tokyo
  • 1975 - Minami Gallery, Tokyo

Permanent collections

  • Guggenheim Museum, New York[3]
  • Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art, New York
  • Brooklyn Museum, New York
  • Menard Art Museum, Nagoya
  • Shizuoka Prefectural Museum of Art
  • Shimane Art Museum
  • Museu de Arte Moderna, São Paulo
  • National Museum of Modern Art, Tokyo
  • Municipal Museum, Kagoshima
  • Museum of Modern Art, Kamakura
gollark: But that is... absolutely not the case.
gollark: I mean, yes, if you already trust everyone to act sensibly and without doing bad stuff, then privacy doesn't matter for those reasons.
gollark: Oh, and as an extension to the third thing, if you already have some sort of vast surveillance apparatus, even if you trust the government of *now*, a worse government could come along and use it later for... totalitarian things.
gollark: For example:- the average person probably does *some* sort of illegal/shameful/bad/whatever stuff, and if some organization has information on that it can use it against people it wants to discredit (basically, information leads to power, so information asymmetry leads to power asymmetry). This can happen if you decide to be an activist or something much later, even- having lots of data on you means you can be manipulated more easily (see, partly, targeted advertising, except that actually seems to mostly be poorly targeted)- having a government be more effective at detecting minor crimes (which reduced privacy could allow for) might *not* actually be a good thing, as some crimes (drug use, I guess?) are kind of stupid and at least somewhat tolerable because they *can't* be entirely enforced practically
gollark: No, it probably isn't your fault, it must have been dropped from my brain stack while I was writing the rest.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.