Tactical communications

Tactical communications are military communications in which information of any kind, especially orders and military intelligence, are conveyed from one command, person, or place to another upon a battlefield, particularly during the conduct of combat. It includes any kind of delivery of information, whether verbal, written, visual or auditory, and can be sent in a variety of ways. In modern times, this is usually done by electronic means. Tactical communications do not include communications provided to tactical forces by the Defense Communications System to non-tactical military commands, to tactical forces by civil organizations, nor does it include strategic communication.

Early means

The earliest way of communicating with others in a battle was by the commander's voice or by human messenger. Someone would have to run from one commander to a subordinate to tell them what to do. Once the horse was domesticated messages could travel much faster.[1] A very fast way to send information was to use either drums, trumpets or flags. Each sound or banner would have a pre-determined significance for the soldier who would respond accordingly. Auditory signals were only as effective, though, as the receiver's ability to hear them. The din of battle or long distances could make using noise less effective. They were also limited in the amount of information they could convey; the information must be simple, such as attack or retreat.

Visual cues, such as flags or smoke signals required the receiver to have a clear line of sight to the signal, and know when and where to look for them. Intricate warning systems have though always been used such as scouting towers with fires to signal incoming threats - this could occur at the tactical as well as the strategic level. The armies of the 19th century used two flags in combinations that replicated the alphabet. This allowed commanders the ability to send any order they wanted as they needed to, but still relied on line-of-sight.[2] During the Siege of Paris (1870–71) the defending French effectively used carrier pigeons to relay information between tactical units.[3]

The wireless revolution

Although visual communication flew at the speed of light, it relied on a direct line of sight between the sender and the receiver. Telegraphs helped theater commanders to move large armies about, but one certainly could not count on using immobile telegraph lines on a changing battlefield. At the end of the 19th century the disparate units across any field were instantaneously joined to their commanders by the invention and mass production of the radio. At first the radio could only broadcast tones, so messages were sent via Morse code. The first field radios used by the United States Army saw action in the Spanish–American War (1898) and the Philippine Insurrection (1899–1902).[4] At the same time as radios were deployed the field telephone was developed and made commercially viable. This caused a new signal occupation specialty to be developed: lineman.[5]

The digital battlefield

Security was a problem. If you broadcast your plans over radio waves, anyone with a similar radio listening to the same frequency could hear your plans. Advances in electronics, particularly during World War II, allowed for electronic scrambling of radio broadcasts, which permitted messages to be encrypted with ciphers too complex for humans to crack without the assistance of a similar, high-tech machine, such as the German Enigma machine. Once computer science advanced, large amounts of data could be sent over the airwaves in quick bursts of signals and more complex encryption was allowed.

Communication between armies were of course much more difficult before the electronic age and could only be achieved with messengers on horseback or by foot and with time delays according to the distance the messenger needed to travel. Advances in long-range communications aided the commander on the battlefield, for then they could receive news of any outside force or factor that could impact the conduct of a battle.

gollark: Humans are VERY BAD at that. We can barely even acknowledge stuff like positive-sum "games".
gollark: ↑ someone who has never interacted with any humans
gollark: Plus extra voting-related issues - you have to integrate EVERYONE'S DIFFERENT VALUES into your central plan, and somehow have people vote on incredibly complex plans.
gollark: As I said, you're still stuck with every single other issue of it.
gollark: What, voting on central planning?

See also

References
  1. Raines, 3.
  2. Raines, 5.
  3. Raines, 68
  4. Raines, 136.
  5. Raines, 82–3.

Sources
  •  This article incorporates public domain material from the General Services Administration document: "Federal Standard 1037C". (in support of MIL-STD-188)

History of Communications. Bakersfield, CA: William Penn School, 2011. http://library.thinkquest.org/5729/ Raines, Rebecca Robbins. "Getting the Message Through: A Branch History of the U.S. Army Signal Corps" (Washington: Center of Military History, US Army, 1999). Rienzi, Thomas Matthew. "Vietnam Studies: Communications-Electronics 1962–1970. (Washington: Department of the Army, 1985. "Signal Corps History." Augusta, GA: United States Army Signal Center, 2012. https://web.archive.org/web/20130403050141/http://www.signal.army.mil/ocos/rdiv/histarch/schist.asp

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.