Symplectic vector space

In mathematics, a symplectic vector space is a vector space V over a field F (for example the real numbers R) equipped with a symplectic bilinear form.

A symplectic bilinear form is a mapping ω : V × VF that is

  • bilinear: linear in each argument separately,
  • alternating: ω(v, v) = 0 holds for all vV, and
  • nondegenerate: ω(u, v) = 0 for all vV implies that u is zero.

If the underlying field has characteristic not 2, alternation is equivalent to skew-symmetry. If the characteristic is 2, the skew-symmetry is implied by, but does not imply alternation. In this case every symplectic form is a symmetric form, but not vice versa. Working in a fixed basis, ω can be represented by a matrix. The conditions above say that this matrix must be skew-symmetric, nonsingular, and hollow. This is not the same thing as a symplectic matrix, which represents a symplectic transformation of the space. If V is finite-dimensional, then its dimension must necessarily be even since every skew-symmetric, hollow matrix of odd size has determinant zero. Notice the condition that the matrix be hollow is not redundant if the characteristic of the field is 2. A symplectic form behaves quite differently from a symmetric form, for example, the scalar product on Euclidean vector spaces.

Standard symplectic space

The standard symplectic space is R2n with the symplectic form given by a nonsingular, skew-symmetric matrix. Typically ω is chosen to be the block matrix

where In is the n × n identity matrix. In terms of basis vectors (x1, ..., xn, y1, ..., yn):

A modified version of the Gram–Schmidt process shows that any finite-dimensional symplectic vector space has a basis such that ω takes this form, often called a Darboux basis, or symplectic basis.

There is another way to interpret this standard symplectic form. Since the model space R2n used above carries much canonical structure which might easily lead to misinterpretation, we will use "anonymous" vector spaces instead. Let V be a real vector space of dimension n and V its dual space. Now consider the direct sum W = VV of these spaces equipped with the following form:

Now choose any basis (v1, ..., vn) of V and consider its dual basis

We can interpret the basis vectors as lying in W if we write xi = (vi, 0) and yi = (0, vi). Taken together, these form a complete basis of W,

The form ω defined here can be shown to have the same properties as in the beginning of this section. On the other hand, every symplectic structure is isomorphic to one of the form VV. The subspace V is not unique, and a choice of subspace V is called a polarization. The subspaces that give such an isomorphism are called Lagrangian subspaces or simply Lagrangians.

Explicitly, given a Lagrangian subspace (as defined below), then a choice of basis (x1, ..., xn) defines a dual basis for a complement, by ω(xi, yj) = δij.

Analogy with complex structures

Just as every symplectic structure is isomorphic to one of the form VV, every complex structure on a vector space is isomorphic to one of the form VV. Using these structures, the tangent bundle of an n-manifold, considered as a 2n-manifold, has an almost complex structure, and the cotangent bundle of an n-manifold, considered as a 2n-manifold, has a symplectic structure: T(TM)p = Tp(M) ⊕ (Tp(M)).

The complex analog to a Lagrangian subspace is a real subspace, a subspace whose complexification is the whole space: W = VJ V. As can be seen from the standard symplectic form above, every symplectic form on is isomorphic to the imaginary part of the standard complex (Hermitian) inner product on (with the convention of the first argument being anti-linear).

Volume form

Let ω be an alternating bilinear form on an n-dimensional real vector space V, ω ∈ Λ2(V). Then ω is non-degenerate if and only if n is even and ωn/2 = ω ∧ ... ∧ ω is a volume form. A volume form on a n-dimensional vector space V is a non-zero multiple of the n-form e1 ∧ ... ∧ en where e1, e2, ..., en is a basis of V.

For the standard basis defined in the previous section, we have

By reordering, one can write

Authors variously define ωn or (−1)n/2ωn as the standard volume form. An occasional factor of n! may also appear, depending on whether the definition of the alternating product contains a factor of n! or not. The volume form defines an orientation on the symplectic vector space (V, ω).

Symplectic map

Suppose that (V, ω) and (W, ρ) are symplectic vector spaces. Then a linear map f : VW is called a symplectic map if the pullback preserves the symplectic form, i.e. fρ = ω, where the pullback form is defined by (fρ)(u, v) = ρ(f(u), f(v)). Symplectic maps are volume- and orientation-preserving.

Symplectic group

If V = W, then a symplectic map is called a linear symplectic transformation of V. In particular, in this case one has that ω(f(u), f(v)) = ω(u, v), and so the linear transformation f preserves the symplectic form. The set of all symplectic transformations forms a group and in particular a Lie group, called the symplectic group and denoted by Sp(V) or sometimes Sp(V, ω). In matrix form symplectic transformations are given by symplectic matrices.

Subspaces

Let W be a linear subspace of V. Define the symplectic complement of W to be the subspace

The symplectic complement satisfies:

However, unlike orthogonal complements, WW need not be 0. We distinguish four cases:

  • W is symplectic if WW = {0}. This is true if and only if ω restricts to a nondegenerate form on W. A symplectic subspace with the restricted form is a symplectic vector space in its own right.
  • W is isotropic if WW. This is true if and only if ω restricts to 0 on W. Any one-dimensional subspace is isotropic.
  • W is coisotropic if WW. W is coisotropic if and only if ω descends to a nondegenerate form on the quotient space W/W. Equivalently W is coisotropic if and only if W is isotropic. Any codimension-one subspace is coisotropic.
  • W is Lagrangian if W = W. A subspace is Lagrangian if and only if it is both isotropic and coisotropic. In a finite-dimensional vector space, a Lagrangian subspace is an isotropic one whose dimension is half that of V. Every isotropic subspace can be extended to a Lagrangian one.

Referring to the canonical vector space R2n above,

  • the subspace spanned by {x1, y1} is symplectic
  • the subspace spanned by {x1, x2} is isotropic
  • the subspace spanned by {x1, x2, ..., xn, y1} is coisotropic
  • the subspace spanned by {x1, x2, ..., xn} is Lagrangian.

Heisenberg group

A Heisenberg group can be defined for any symplectic vector space, and this is the typical way that Heisenberg groups arise.

A vector space can be thought of as a commutative Lie group (under addition), or equivalently as a commutative Lie algebra, meaning with trivial Lie bracket. The Heisenberg group is a central extension of such a commutative Lie group/algebra: the symplectic form defines the commutation, analogously to the canonical commutation relations (CCR), and a Darboux basis corresponds to canonical coordinates – in physics terms, to momentum operators and position operators.

Indeed, by the Stone–von Neumann theorem, every representation satisfying the CCR (every representation of the Heisenberg group) is of this form, or more properly unitarily conjugate to the standard one.

Further, the group algebra of (the dual to) a vector space is the symmetric algebra, and the group algebra of the Heisenberg group (of the dual) is the Weyl algebra: one can think of the central extension as corresponding to quantization or deformation.

Formally, the symmetric algebra of V is the group algebra of the dual, Sym(V) := K[V], and the Weyl algebra is the group algebra of the (dual) Heisenberg group W(V) = K[H(V)]. Since passing to group algebras is a contravariant functor, the central extension map H(V) → V becomes an inclusion Sym(V) → W(V).

gollark: I was mostly complaining about their specific reasoning there (it is not very sensible, inasmuch as basically no possible bad event is *guaranteed* but ignoring the possibility of them is quite bad for you), but I don't agree with the rest of what they said either, so thing.
gollark: Bold of you to assume I know things.
gollark: > it's okay to not be scared of what MIGHT happenThis is such a moronically stupid attitude toward risk. Among other things.
gollark: ("you" in general)
gollark: I think that you generally have basically no chance of actually convincing anyone wrt. politics, and will probably just alienate them.

See also

References

  • Abraham, Ralph; Marsden, Jerrold E. (1978). "Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Systems". Foundations of Mechanics. London: Benjamin-Cummings. pp. 161–252. ISBN 0-8053-0102-X.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.