Symmetric decreasing rearrangement

In mathematics, the symmetric decreasing rearrangement of a function is a function which is symmetric and decreasing, and whose level sets are of the same size as those of the original function.[1]

Definition for sets

Given a measurable set, , in Rn , one defines the symmetric rearrangement of , called , as the ball centered at the origin, whose volume (Lebesgue measure) is the same as that of the set .

An equivalent definition is

where is the volume of the unit ball and where is the volume of .

Definition for functions

The rearrangement of a non-negative, measurable real-valued function whose level sets () have finite measure is

where denotes the indicator function of the set A. In words, the value of gives the height for which the radius of the symmetric rearrangement of is equal to . We have the following motivation for this definition. Because the identity

holds for any non-negative function , the above definition is the unique definition that forces the identity to hold.

Properties

Function and its symmetric decreasing rearrangement preserve the measure of level sets.

The function is a symmetric and decreasing function whose level sets have the same measure as the level sets of , i.e.

If is a function in , then

The Hardy–Littlewood inequality holds, i.e.

Further, the Pólya–Szegő inequality holds. This says that if and if then

The symmetric decreasing rearrangement is order preserving and decreases distance, i.e.

and

Applications

The PólyaSzegő inequality yields, in the limit case, with , the isoperimetric inequality. Also, one can use some relations with harmonic functions to prove the Rayleigh–Faber–Krahn inequality.

Nonsymmetric decreasing rearrangement

We can also define f* as a function on the nonnegative real numbers rather than on all of Rn.[2] Let (E,μ) be any σ-finite measure space, and let be a measurable function that takes only finite (i.e., real) values μ-a.e. (where "μ-a.e." means except possibly on a set of μ-measure zero). We define the distribution function by the rule

We can now define the decreasing rearrangment (or, sometimes, nonincreasing rearrangement of f as the function and the rule

Note that this version of the decreasing rearrangement is not symmetric, as it is only defined on the nonnegative real numbers. However, it inherits many of the same properties listed above as the symmetric version. Namely:

f and f* are equimeasurable, i.e. they have the same distribution function.
The Hardy-Littlewood inequality holds, i.e.
μ-a.e. implies .
for all real numbers a.
for all .
μ-a.e. implies .
for all positive real numbers p.
for all positive real numbers p.

The (nonsymmetric) decreasing rearrangement function arises often in the theory of rearrangement-invariant Banach function spaces. Especially important is the following:

Luxemburg Representation Theorem. Let be a rearrangement-invariant Banach function norm over a resonant measure space . Then there exists a (possibly not unique) rearrangement-invariant function norm on such that for all nonnegative measurable functions which are finite-valued μ-a.e.

Note that the definitions of all the terminology in the above theorem (i.e., Banach function norms, rearrangement-invariant Banach function spaces, and resonant measure spaces) can be found in sections 1 and 2 of Bennett and Sharpley's book (cf. the references below).

gollark: > Pi’s Attention Marketplace - Bartering Unutilized Attention And TimeAAAAAAAÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆAAAAAAAAAAAAÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆAAÆÆÆAAÆÆÆAAAÆÆAAAÆÆAAAÆÆAAAÆÆAAAÆÆAAÆÆÆAAÆÆAAAÆÆAAAÆAAAÆÆÆAÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆAAAa
gollark: > First of all, we need to emphasize that the Pi Node software has not been released yet. So this section is offered more as an architectural design and as a request to solicit comments from the technical community. This software will be fully open source and it will also heavily depend on stellar-core which is also open source software, available here. This means that anyone in the community will be able to read, comment and propose improvements on it. Below are the Pi proposed changes to SCP to enable mining by individual devices. !!!
gollark: > Pioneer. A user of the Pi mobile app who is simply confirming that they are not a “robot” on a daily basis. This user validates their presence every time they sign in to the app. They can also open the app to request transactions (e.g. make a payment in Pi to another Pioneer)Hmm.
gollark: Presumably, if you run 1000000 emulators, they'll just exile you.
gollark: Ah, that makes sense then.

See also

References

  1. Lieb, Elliott; Loss, Michael (2001). Analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. 14 (2nd ed.). American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0821827833.
  2. Bennett, Colin; Sharpley, Robert (1988). Interpolation of Operators. ISBN 978-0-120-88730-9.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.