Susan Speer

Susan "Sue" Speer C.Psychol, FHEA is a senior lecturer at the School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester.[1]

Susan Speer
Other namesSue Speer
Academic background
Alma materLoughborough University
Academic work
InstitutionsUniversity of Manchester
Main interestsPsychology
WebsiteUniversity of Manchester

From 2005 to 2006 Speer was an ESRC-SSRC collaborative visiting fellow in the department of sociology at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).[2]

Selected bibliography

Forthcoming
  • Speer, Susan A.; Stokoe, Elizabeth. Flirting: Designedly ambiguous actions in interpersonal attraction.

Books
  • Speer, Susan (2005). Gender talk: feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. London New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415246446.
  • Speer, Susan A.; Stokoe, Elizabeth (2011). Conversation and gender. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521696036.

Chapters in books
  • Speer, Susan A.; Potter, Jonathan (2002), "From performatives to practices: Judith Butler, discursive psychology, and the management of heterosexist talk", in McIlvenny, Paul (ed.), Talking gender and sexuality, Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 151–180, ISBN 9789027251145.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Potter, Jonathan (2007), "The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims", in Potter, Jonathan (ed.), Discourse and psychology: Volume II, SAGE Benchmarks in Psychology, Los Angeles: Sage, ISBN 9781412934039.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Green, Richard (2010), "On passing: The interactional organization of appearance attributions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients", in Clarke, Victoria; Peel, Elizabeth (eds.), Out in psychology: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer psychology: an introduction, Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–368, ISBN 9780521700184.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Parsons, Ceri (2007), ""Suppose it wasn't possible for you to go any further with treatment, what would you do?" Hypothetical questions in interactions between psychiatrists and transsexual patients", in Hepburn, Alexa; Wiggins, Sally (eds.), Discursive research in practice: new approaches to psychology and interaction, Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–199, ISBN 9780521614092.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (2008), "Natural and contrived data", in Brannen, Julia; Alasuutari, Pertti; Bickman, Leonard (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods, Los Angeles, California London: SAGE, pp. 290–312, ISBN 9781848607309.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Hutchby, Ian (2008), "From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices", in Hutchby, Ian (ed.), Methods in language and social interaction (Volume IV: Embodiment, modality and mediation), SAGE Benchmarks in Social Research Methods, Los Angeles London: Sage, ISBN 9781412935555.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (2009), "Passing as a transsexual woman in the gender identity clinic", in Wetherell, Margaret (ed.), Theorizing identities and social action, Identity Studies in the Social Sciences, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire England New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 116–138, ISBN 9780230580886.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Hutchby, Ian (2009), "From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices", in Fielding, Nigel G. (ed.), Interviewing II (Volume I–IV), SAGE Benchmarks in Social Research Methods, London Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, ISBN 9781412928670.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
With a response by Hammersley, Martyn: 'Analytics' are no substitute for methodology: A response to Speer and Hutchby
  • Speer, Susan A. (2010), "Section II Understanding social marginalisation in LGBTQ lives: Trans and queer (Box 4.1, Key researcher: Susan Speer on why I study trans)", in Clarke, Victoria; Ellis, Sonja J.; Peel, Elizabeth; et al. (eds.), Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer psychology: an introduction, Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–90, ISBN 9780521700184.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (2010), "Pursuing views and testing commitments: Hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients", in Freed, Alice; Ehrlich, Susan (eds.), Why do you ask? the function of questions in institutional discourse, Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–158, ISBN 9780195306903.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Stokoe, Elizabeth (2011), "An introduction to conversation and gender", in Speer, Susan A.; Stokoe, Elizabeth (eds.), Conversation and gender, Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–27, ISBN 9780521696036.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (2011), "On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a 'real' woman", in Speer, Susan A.; Stokoe, Elizabeth (eds.), Conversation and gender, Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–182, ISBN 9780521696036.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Goodman, Simon (2015), "Part 1: Epistemology and method interpretative repertoires: Natural and contrived data", in Tileagă, Cristian; Stokoe, Elizabeth (eds.), Discursive psychology: classic and contemporary issues, Oxford New York: Routledge, ISBN 9780415721608.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (2015), "Sexist discourse", in Tracy, Karen; Ilie, Cornelia; Sandel, Todd (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of language and social interaction, Malden, Massachusetts: International Communication Association and Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 9781118611104.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

Journal articles
With a response: Edley, Nigel (February 2001). "Conversation analysis, discursive psychology and the study of ideology: A response to Susan Speer" (PDF). Feminism & Psychology. 11 (1): 136–140. doi:10.1177/0959353501011001007.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Rejoinder: Speer, Susan A. (February 2001). "Participants' orientations, ideology and the ontological status of hegemonic masculinity: A rejoinder to Nigel Edley". Feminism & Psychology. 11 (1): 141–144. doi:10.1177/0959353501011001008.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
With a response: Tenhave, Paul (August 2002). "Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's 'natural' and 'contrived' data: a sustainable distinction?". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 527–530. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040701.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
With a response: Lynch, Michael (August 2002). "From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: comment on Speer". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 531–537. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040801.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
With a response: Potter, Jonathan (August 2002). "Two kinds of natural". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 539–542. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040901.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Rejoinder: Speer, Susan A. (August 2002). "Transcending the 'natural'/'contrived' distinction: a rejoinder to ten Have, Lynch and Potter". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 543–548. doi:10.1177/14614456020040041001.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (August 2002). "Sexist talk: gender categories, participants' orientations and irony". Journal of Sociolinguistics. 6 (3): 347–377. doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00192.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (November 2002). "What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice". Discourse & Society. 13 (6): 783–803. doi:10.1177/0957926502013006757.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Hutchby, Ian (May 2003). "From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices". Sociology. 37 (2): 315–337. doi:10.1177/0038038503037002006.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
With a response: Hammersley, Martyn (May 2003). "'Analytics' are no substitute for methodology: A response to Speer and Hutchby". Sociology. 37 (2): 339–351. doi:10.1177/0038038503037002007.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Rejoinder: Speer, Susan A.; Hutchby, Ian (May 2003). "Methodology needs analytics: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley". Sociology. 37 (2): 353–359. doi:10.1177/0038038503037002008.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (February 2005). "The interactional organization of the gender attribution process". Sociology. 39 (1): 67–87. doi:10.1177/0038038505049002.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Parsons, Ceri (November 2006). "Gatekeeping gender: some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients". Discourse & Society. 17 (6): 785–812. doi:10.1177/0957926506068433.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (February 2007). "On recruiting conversation analysis for critical realist purposes". Theory & Psychology. 17 (1): 125–135. doi:10.1177/0959354307073155.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
A response to: Sims-Schouten, Wendy; Riley, Sarah C.E.; Willig, Carla (February 2007). "Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women's talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example". Theory & Psychology. 17 (1): 101–124. doi:10.1177/0959354307073153.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A.; Goodman, Simon (August 2007). "Category use in the construction of asylum seekers". Critical Discourse Studies. 4 (2): 165–185. doi:10.1080/17405900701464832.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (March 2012). "The interactional organization of self-praise: Epistemics, preference organization, and implications for identity tesearch". Social Psychology Quarterly. 75 (1): 52–79. doi:10.1177/0190272511432939.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (October 2012). "Hypothetical questions: A comparative analysis and implications for "applied" versus "basic" conversation analysis". Research on Language & Social Interaction. 45 (4): 352–374. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.724987.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Speer, Susan A. (October 2012). "'Feminist' conversation analysis: Who needs it?". Qualitative Research in Psychology. 9 (4): 292–297. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.635132.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
A response to: Whelan, Pauline (October 2012). "Oxymoronic and sociologically monstrous? Feminist conversation analysis". Qualitative Research in Psychology. 9 (4): 279–291. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.634360.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Rejoinder: Whelan, Pauline (October 2012). "Glossing conversation analysis with feminism?". Qualitative Research in Psychology. 9 (4): 303–313. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.634362.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
A response to: Miller, Paul K. (December 2012). "Arsène didn't see it: Coaching, research and the promise of a discursive psychology" (PDF). International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching. 7 (4): 615–635. doi:10.1260/1747-9541.7.4.615.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf of pp. 615–646.

References
  1. Wetherell, Margaret (2009), "List of contributors xiii", in Wetherell, Margaret (ed.), Theorizing identities and social action, Identity Studies in the Social Sciences, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire England New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. xiii, ISBN 9780230580886.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  2. Freed, Alice; Ehrlich, Susan (2010), "Contributors", in Freed, Alice; Ehrlich, Susan (eds.), Why do you ask? the function of questions in institutional discourse, Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, p. xiv, ISBN 9780195306903.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.