Superradiance

In physics, superradiance is the radiation enhancement effects in several contexts including quantum mechanics, astrophysics and relativity.

Quantum optics

For want of a better term, a gas which is radiating strongly because of coherence will be called 'superradiant'.

— Robert H. Dicke, 1954, [1]

In quantum optics, superradiance is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of N emitters, such as excited atoms, interact with a common light field. If the wavelength of the light is much greater than the separation of the emitters, then the emitters interact with the light in a collective and coherent fashion.[2] This causes the group to emit light as a high intensity pulse (with rate ∝ N2). This is a surprising result, drastically different from the expected exponential decay (with rate ∝ N) of a group of independent atoms (see spontaneous emission). Superradiance has since been demonstrated in a wide variety of physical and chemical systems, such as quantum dot arrays [3] and J-aggregates.[4] The effect has recently been used to produce a superradiant laser.

Rotational superradiance

Rotational superradiance[5] is associated with the acceleration or motion of a nearby body (which supplies the energy and momentum for the effect). It is also sometimes described as the consequence of an "effective" field differential around the body (e.g. the effect of tidal forces). This allows a body with a concentration of angular or linear momentum to move towards a lower energy state, even when there is no obvious classical mechanism for this to happen. In this sense, the effect has some similarities with quantum tunnelling (e.g. the tendency of waves and particles to "find a way" to exploit the existence of an energy potential, despite the absence of an obvious classical mechanism for this to happen).

  • In classical physics, the motion or rotation of a body in a particulate medium will normally be expected to result in momentum and energy being transferred to the surrounding particles, and there is then an increased statistical likelihood of particles being discovered following trajectories that imply removal of momentum from the body.
  • In quantum mechanics, this principle is extended to the case of bodies moving, accelerating or rotating in a vacuum – in the quantum case, quantum fluctuations with appropriate vectors are said to be stretched and distorted and provided with energy and momentum by the nearby body's motion, with this selective amplification generating real physical radiation around the body.

Where a classical description of a rotating isolated weightless sphere in a vacuum will tend to say that the sphere will continue to rotate indefinitely, due the lack of frictional effects or any other form of obvious coupling with its smooth empty environment, under quantum mechanics the surrounding region of vacuum is not entirely smooth, and the sphere's field can couple with quantum fluctuations and accelerate them to produce real radiation. Hypothetical virtual wavefronts with appropriate paths around the body are stimulated and amplified into real physical wavefronts by the coupling process. Descriptions sometimes refer to these fluctuations "tickling" the field to produce the effect.

In theoretical studies of black holes, the effect is also sometimes described as the consequence of the gravitational tidal forces around a strongly gravitating body pulling apart virtual particle pairs that would otherwise quickly mutually annihilate, to produce a population of real particles in the region outside the horizon.

The black hole bomb is an exponentially growing instability in the interaction between a massive bosonic field and a rotating black hole.

Astrophysics and relativity

In astrophysics, the most popularly known example of superradiance is probably Zel'dovich radiation.[6] It was Yakov Zel'dovich who first described this effect in 1971[7], Igor Novikov at the University of Moscow further developed the theory.

Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich picked the case under quantum electrodynamics ("QED") where the region around the equator of a spinning metal sphere is expected to throw off electromagnetic radiation tangentially, and suggested that the case of a spinning gravitational mass, such as a Kerr black hole ought to produce similar coupling effects, and ought to radiate in an analogous way.

This was followed by arguments from Stephen Hawking and others that an accelerated observer near a black hole (e.g. an observer carefully lowered towards the horizon at the end of a rope) ought to see the region inhabited by "real" radiation, whereas for a distant observer this radiation would be said to be "virtual". If the accelerated observer near the event horizon traps a nearby particle and throws it out to the distant observer for capture and study, then for the distant observer, the appearance of the particle can be explained by saying that the physical acceleration of the particle has turned it from a virtual particle into a "real" particle [8] (see Hawking radiation).

Similar arguments apply for the cases of observers in accelerated frames (Unruh radiation). Cherenkov radiation, electromagnetic radiation emitted by charged particles travelling through a particulate medium at more than the nominal speed of light in that medium, has also been described as "inertial motion superradiance".[5]

gollark: Unrelatedly, this lockpicking set is somewhat hard to use.
gollark: LyricLy has diabetes? Added to his health profile.
gollark: bad incentives moment.
gollark: Or at least every day I accidentally get some amount of toothpaste on my pajamas.
gollark: I ask myself that same question every day.

See also

References
  1. Dicke, Robert H. (1954). "Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes". Physical Review. 93 (1): 99–110. Bibcode:1954PhRv...93...99D. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.93.99.
  2. Gross, M.; Haroche, S. (1 December 1982). "Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission". Physics Reports. 93 (5): 301–396. Bibcode:1982PhR....93..301G. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(82)90102-8.
  3. Scheibner, Michael; Schmidt, T.; Worschech, L.; Forchel, A.; Bacher, G.; Passow, T.; Hommel, D. (2007). "Superradiance of quantum dots". Nature Physics. 3 (2): 106–110. Bibcode:2007NatPh...3..106S. doi:10.1038/nphys494.
  4. Benedict, M.G. (1996). Super-radiance : multiatomic coherent emission. Bristol [u.a.]: Inst. of Physics Publ. ISBN 0750302836.
  5. Bekenstein, Jacob; Schiffer, Marcelo (1998). "The many faces of superradiance". Physical Review D. 58 (6). arXiv:gr-qc/9803033. Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58f4014B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.064014.
  6. Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black holes and timewarps: Einstein's outrageous legacy. p. 432.
  7. Zel'Dovich, Yakov Borisovich (1971). "Generation of waves by a rotating body" (PDF). ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu. 14: 270 – via http://adsabs.harvard.edu/.
  8. Thorne, Price and Macdonald (eds) (1986). Black holes: the membrane paradigm.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.